Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spetznaz

Well the parameters of this competition changed considerably since this deal was first brought about in 1999 to buy 126 Mirages.So the talk of a junior pal for the SU-30 is just that-talk!!!


31 posted on 08/30/2007 7:19:00 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki
I hadn't heard about that. I always operated under the assumption that this was akin to a 'F-15/F-16'-esque hi-lo mix, not a 'F-15/F-14'-esque type of situation. In that case then the Typhoon et al might have a fighting chance, and as you said the longer the selection takes the better for Rafale/Typhoon (greater maturity of systems/tranches, plus a hgiher likelihood that the respective French/EU govs, respectively, may get more flexible on price). In which case the InAF would be getting truly superior airframes.

What do you think are the chances for the Rafale and the Typhoon, and more importantly how would they fit into InAF doctrine?

37 posted on 08/30/2007 8:15:11 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson