Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'POVERTY' IN AMERICA
New York Post ^ | August 30, 2007 | ROBERT RECTOR

Posted on 08/30/2007 5:52:20 AM PDT by OESY

The Census Bureau announced Tuesday that 36.5 million Americans are "poor." Presidential candidate John Edwards claims these 36.5 million Americans "do not have enough money for the food, shelter and clothing they need." According to Edwards, poverty is an appalling national "plague" forcing "one in eight of us" to live in "terrible" circumstances.

But, if poverty means (as Edwards claims) a lack of nutritious food, adequate warm housing and clothing, then very few of the 36.5 million people identified as "poor" by Census are, in fact, poor....

According to the government's own data, the typical person defined as "poor" by the Census has cable or satellite TV, air conditioning, a microwave, a DVD player or VCR, and two color TVs. Three quarters of these "poor" own a car and nearly a third have two or more cars.

By his own testimony, the typical "poor" person consistently has enough food to feed his family and enough money to meet all essential expenses such as mortgage, rent, utilities and important medical care. When asked, he reports that his family was able to obtain medical care whenever needed during the past year....

Father absence is another major cause of child poverty. Nearly two-thirds of poor children reside in single-parent homes. Another 1.5 million children are born out of wedlock each year. If poor single mothers married the fathers of their children, almost three-quarters would immediately be lifted out of poverty.

While work and marriage are reliable ladders out of poverty, the welfare system remains perversely hostile to both. Despite welfare reform, major programs such as food stamps, public housing and Medicaid continue to reward idleness and penalize marriage....

Immigration also plays a major role in U.S. poverty. Each year, our nation imports hundreds of thousands of new poor persons....

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: census; edwards; poor; poverty

1 posted on 08/30/2007 5:52:21 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OESY


One of his Two Americas is Fantasyland.

To win elections, Democrats have to invent poverty.

That's why they make no serious proposals to solve the problem.

.

2 posted on 08/30/2007 5:52:45 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Very nice piece.

Work and marriage do the most to eliminate poverty.
Government programs and illegal immigration increase poverty.

The GOP needs to shout it from the rooftop.

3 posted on 08/30/2007 5:57:05 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agammemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

As someone who grew up in rural South Carolina in the 60’s, all I can say is “What poverty?”.


4 posted on 08/30/2007 5:58:51 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Demagogues like Edwards that play on the poverty theme probably believe in what they advocate, which is bigger government, higher taxes and more income redistribution. An objective analysis of social programs from FDR, LBJ up to today, demonstrate that government assistance is best administered sparingly. The plethora of programs that or Federal Government uses to throw money at the “poverty” problem fail to focus on the real problem. Many people in poverty are there because of poor choices like having fatherless babies as teenagers, dropping out of school, substance abuse, and lack of initiative. A thoughtful government should assist the truly needy, such as the blind an disabled, and give aid on a temporary basis for those that just have bad luck.
Also, the poverty statistics don’t account for much, like my Mom qualifies due to her meager Social Security check, yet she had substantial assets that support her quality of life.
5 posted on 08/30/2007 6:14:26 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OESY
The sustainability of support from the democratic voting basis is wholly dependent on a perceived misery of its constituency.

Therefore, it is incumbent upon every democratic politician to exaggerate or even invent issues and propagandize the tragedy of this American condition of misery, so as to feed a media bent on liberal ideology and leadership for socio-political agendas.

6 posted on 08/30/2007 6:15:08 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (No to nitwit jesters with a predisposition of self importance and unqualified political opinions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Mr. Edwards would like all of us to be poor. That way, the poor disappear.

Great idea, huh?

Perhaps he intends to weld thousands of SUVs together to provide low income housing for “the poor”?


7 posted on 08/30/2007 6:19:08 AM PDT by RexBeach ("Americans never quit." Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

I have been driving by a large low income housing project in Boston for years. Just last week for some reason I started to notice the types of vehicles parked on the street next to the project. About 75% of the vehicles were newer than the 2000 F150 I drive and will have to drive for a few more years.


8 posted on 08/30/2007 6:44:04 AM PDT by lonerepubinma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

“Terrible conditions” defined as what? Mud huts? No clean water? Get real.


9 posted on 08/30/2007 6:47:56 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1
Therefore, it is incumbent upon every democratic politician to exaggerate or even invent issues and propagandize the tragedy of this American condition of misery, so as to feed a media bent on liberal ideology and leadership for socio-political agendas.

Whenever I see something like this I am reminded of this line from A Patriot's History of the United States by Larry Schweikart and Michael Allen.

"Advances were so rapid that after a visit to the South in 1958, North Vietnamese commisar Le Doan returned with alarming news that conditions in the South were improving at such a pace that in the near future insufficient sentiment for a communist revolution would exist.

Here was the communist bottom line: their cause was only advanced out of misery, and when average people improved their lot, communism came out a loser."

10 posted on 08/30/2007 6:52:43 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat; but they know what's best for us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

Well here we are back to that old tired democrat theme of poverty.Last election it was no stem cell research by the mean Republicans and before that it was ‘three out of four people were homeless’, then everyhing was for the ‘children’ and old people were eating dog food, round and round, democrats are like a dog foolishly chasing its tail.


11 posted on 08/30/2007 7:08:48 AM PDT by Maumee (wt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Work and marriage do the most to eliminate poverty. Government programs and illegal immigration increase poverty.

One thing Democrats never promote is marriage. The base of Feminists and gay-lesbians won't let them--not to mention the rest of the party faithful, gullible, pathetic and apathetic. Paraphrasing Ann Coulter, keeping your legs together before marriage might the single most important thing to do to avoid poverty. It's easy to see the conflict with the liberal message. Beyond that, in a sense, marriage acts like economic household insurance so that if one is laid off, the couple does not lose their entire source of income.

.

12 posted on 08/30/2007 10:40:24 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy


Here's my support: The Kneepad Girl



"I'd be happy to give him [oral sex] just to thank him for keeping abortion legal."

Those were the enlightening words uttered by former Time contributor and White House correspondent Nina Burleigh in an interview in Mirabella magazine, as reported by Howard Kurtz in a Washington Post Article. However, it was learned on 07/16/98 that her comment was a little different from that. Nina Burleigh has now filled in what word she really used in the spot the Post bracketed and revealed her next sentence to Kurtz, that he did not share with readers.

Her full quote: “I would be happy to give him a blowjob just to thank him for keeping abortion legal. I think American women should be lining up with their presidential kneepads on to show their gratitude for keeping the theocracy off our backs.”

So women should all break out their kneepads. Sorry Nina, I think we’ll pass on your “blow the President” suggestion. Not all American women live by your standards - or lack thereof....”

— Carolyn Gargaro & Stephanie Herman - Rightgrrl Founders, July 10, 1998, http://www.rightgrrl.com/sexforacause.html
.

13 posted on 08/30/2007 10:50:07 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Dear Mr. Edwards - take a flight with my son Ace, an airline captain in Africa. With a life expectancy of 36 for males; that’s poverty. And it’s a shame. Angola is an oil-rich, beautiful place. The communist government takes all the profits and squirrels them away in foreign bank accounts. Hunger and squalor abound. I know I’m preachin’ to the choir here, but use it as ammunition. Yesterday it was: Avery = 0 Dragon = 1
14 posted on 08/30/2007 11:18:23 AM PDT by Ace's Dad ("but every now and then, the Dragon comes to call")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

bfl


15 posted on 08/30/2007 11:45:29 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

I once lived in one of the poorest neighborhoods in the state of Oregon, at the base of the 12th Street hill in southeast Salem. My apartment complex on Peace Street (*irony alert*) was filled with actual gang members, Section 8 moms, and alcholics. They were fat and had enough money for really good dope, and, yes, they had cars, TVs. VCRs, stereos, good furniture, nice clothes, etc., etc. They also bitched and complained about the rich.


16 posted on 08/30/2007 4:43:02 PM PDT by redpoll (redpoll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson