Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thompson announcement date likely to come today
The Politico ^ | 8/30/2007 | Jonathan Martin

Posted on 08/30/2007 8:54:56 AM PDT by Greystoke

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-207 next last
To: Astronaut
Yawn. Wasn’t it supposed to be July 4? Then sometime in August?

The campaign never said that. Those where just internet rumors. So you hold Fred responsible for internet rumors?

141 posted on 08/30/2007 11:21:25 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

“It certainly feels like he is announcing something... “

Maybe if I saw the actual email and saw that the little disclaimer on the bottom saying that this email is “for those addresses listed only” had been deleted, I could “feel that this was an announcement”.


142 posted on 08/30/2007 11:24:26 AM PDT by crazyshrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot

“From the FEC Rules and Regulations. Now, the contention will be that Fred and his appearances on L&O give him an unfair advantage of having his face in the public domain, even though it’s not political in nature.”

My question was, why aren’t we hearing this ‘explanation’ from Fred’s campaign rather than supporters on talk boards?

Perhaps it’s not the explanation, especially since we first expected an announcement back around the 4th of July, and that rumour floated for at least a couple of weeks with no clarification from Fred.

Also, not very convincing since there was a FR thread this week about how the MSM TV morning shows had provided twice the time to Dem presidential candidates than Republican, and no sign of complaints to the FEC. A far more clear-cut case of equal time considerations than Fred’s appearing in a TV drama.

The dilly dallying is, if there are explanations for all the rumours that don’t come about, then Fred’s organization should be clarifying immediately, but they only seem to add to the confusion.


143 posted on 08/30/2007 11:24:47 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: hoosierpearl

“There are good explanations for reasonable people. Those reasons have been put out in interviews over and over again. It gets tiresome having to answer the same questions repeatedly as Fred has. Perhaps you were on vacation. Perhaps you support another candidate and you’re mad at Fred and Fred’s supporters.”

Perhaps you will provide links to all these good explanations that have been put out over and over again? And I mean explanations from Fred or his campaign, not speculation from supporters as to what the explanations are.

I’d love to see them because I had great hopes for Fred as a candidate, but he’s hurt himself and all the spin in the world wont’s change that. Just look and listen to what’s in the media this week, all media including the internet.


144 posted on 08/30/2007 11:29:56 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink
He's certainly announcing it to someone.
Isn't it all about getting a definitive answer on whether or not he's running?
This seems like an answer to me, regardless of to whom it was addressed.

 
145 posted on 08/30/2007 11:32:47 AM PDT by counterpunch ("The Democrats are the party of slavery." - Cindy Sheehan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
You put the period is in the wrong place. ; )
146 posted on 08/30/2007 11:36:11 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Why don’t you provide us some links?


147 posted on 08/30/2007 11:37:19 AM PDT by Greystoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Greystoke

Thank you.


148 posted on 08/30/2007 11:37:43 AM PDT by Grunthor (When life gives you lemons, you throw them at the mean people and hope it gets them in the eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Will88
More signs of poor organization and execution.

No... Signs one of his supporters who received the email leaked it, not his campaign.

I'm sure someone here can draw a picture so the anti-Fred contingent can understand.

149 posted on 08/30/2007 11:38:10 AM PDT by jellybean (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=dailyfread Proud Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Greystoke

I think Thompson has milked this whole ‘will he-won’t he’ thing a little too long. I think it may backfire on him.


150 posted on 08/30/2007 11:41:37 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

“He’s certainly announcing it to someone.
Isn’t it all about getting a definitive answer on whether or not he’s running?
This seems like an answer to me, regardless of to whom it was addressed.”

IMO, He is “announcing” to the listed people that he is holding a conference call about an “announcement”. The announcement may be (but highly unlikely) that he is not running. Seems like he is “coordinating and managing” his campaign.

And in the end, this email won’t make a “flea’s saliva’s on an elephant’s back” worth of difference anyways.


151 posted on 08/30/2007 11:45:02 AM PDT by crazyshrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
Why? Do you like a 2 years campaign season?

No I dont but the MSM and Dems seem to be afraid of him so I really want to see them crap in their hats.

152 posted on 08/30/2007 11:46:23 AM PDT by Long Island Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Greystoke

“Why don’t you provide us some links?”

Links concerning what?

A pretty weak reply to my request for links that show that Fred or his organization has actually provided the explanations for all the delays, that actuallyseem to only have come from commenters on talk boards.


153 posted on 08/30/2007 11:48:21 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Will88
Just look and listen to what’s in the media this week, all media including the internet
154 posted on 08/30/2007 11:51:41 AM PDT by Greystoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: crazyshrink

Not a chance.
He wouldn’t set an announcement date unless he has something definitive to announce. That means as of right now he’s already made a decision, and frankly, he made it long ago.

If the decision was not to run, then he would have announced that as soon as he came to it, and with very little fanfare, rather than continue collecting money and building an organization, as he continues to do to this day.


155 posted on 08/30/2007 11:51:45 AM PDT by counterpunch ("The Democrats are the party of slavery." - Cindy Sheehan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: jellybean

“I’m sure someone here can draw a picture so the anti-Fred contingent can understand.”

Not anti-Fred, actually a supporter who’s just weary of all the nonsense.

For example, Red State says flatly that Fred will announce his candidacy TODAY. Here we have a different interpretation and Fred’s organization is doing nothing to clarify. Same old, same old, and all the spin from die hards won’t change the negative impact this has had, is having.

Tammy Bruce is thoroughly disgusted with it, and is making it her main topic of conversation on her show today. There will be more.


156 posted on 08/30/2007 11:53:57 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Let's Roll

Thanks for the ping. This is going to be fun!


157 posted on 08/30/2007 11:54:10 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Romney Rocks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Greystoke
ABC radio news reported at 3pm some sort of announcement will come next hour, with Thompson making it public next week.
158 posted on 08/30/2007 12:03:07 PM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88
To be honest with you I don't think anything posted will convince you of Freds intentions and reasons.

In which case, you should do a little research. The information is out there.

159 posted on 08/30/2007 12:03:12 PM PDT by Pistolshot (Every woman, who can, should learn to shoot, and carry a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Greystoke

“Just look and listen to what’s in the media this week, all media including the internet.”

Still waiting for all those links showing where Fred actually provided explanations for all the delays, rather than speculation from his supporters.

http://www.redstate.com/stories/elections/2008/breaking_fred_thompson_will_announce_his_candidacy_today_at_4_30pm_edt_0#comment

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1888912/posts?q=1&;page=151

Which is correct? THE announcement, or just an announcement about the announcement date?? Definitely the sort of thing a campaign should clear up immediately.


160 posted on 08/30/2007 12:03:20 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson