Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Bush And Bernanke Do Enough?
IBD ^ | August 31, 2007

Posted on 08/31/2007 5:15:44 PM PDT by Kaslin

The Economy: We're pleased to see that both the White House and Fed are willing to take action to make sure the subprime lending crisis doesn't get worse. But we're also glad they understand they can't do everything.


On Friday, with markets looking desperately for direction, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke told a group of bankers, economists and other wonky types that the central bank "will act as needed to limit the adverse effects on the broader economy that may arise from the disruptions in financial markets."

It was Bernanke's first public comment on the subprime crisis since the Fed's Aug. 17 move to cut the discount rate — but not the much-broader fed funds rate — by a half-point to 5.75%.

President Bush then followed up by announcing a series of moves intended to help those who borrowed under subprime lending programs and are now struggling to make their mortgage payments.

(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: bernanke; bush; fed; mortgag

1 posted on 08/31/2007 5:15:46 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
yes. Bernanke showed tough love, without which he will never have credibility or respect (he being synonymous with the Fed as its Chairman).

Pres Bush proposed the softer side, which as a lame duck was the perfect stroke.

Like it or not, piss and moan as would-be experts always do, this was a brilliant strategy. The best.

2 posted on 08/31/2007 5:23:08 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (I'm an endangered species. And I don't want your protection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

It’s compassionate conservatism at its best.


3 posted on 08/31/2007 5:28:12 PM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
And this, from Bernanke: "It is not the responsibility of the Federal Reserve — nor would it be appropriate — to protect lenders and investors from the consequences of their financial decisions."

Who suffers the consequences when the Federal Reserve makes bad financial decisions, such as inverting the yield curve, or incorrectly blaming the economy for inflation?

4 posted on 08/31/2007 5:34:29 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old 300
It’s compassionate conservatism at its best.

I think it's way more than that. I tell you, there have been numerous times during the Bush administration that I have been awed by its subtle, strategic brilliance. This is shaping up to be another. Even if the market unravels as it could for a great variety of reasons, this was politically, economically and psychologically beautiful.

5 posted on 08/31/2007 5:46:23 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (I'm an endangered species. And I don't want your protection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Especially in this second term! We’re definitely seeing a strong, vigorous presidency. No lame duck in recent memory has done this much for the country in the last two years of his last term. It’s simply outstanding.


6 posted on 08/31/2007 5:52:52 PM PDT by Old 300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

I have been awed by its subtle, strategic brilliance.
*****************************************
Could you compare and contrast this move to his MexAmeriCanada policy for me please?


7 posted on 08/31/2007 6:17:09 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Federal Reserve makes bad financial decisions, such as inverting the yield curve,

Wow! I had no idea that the Def had so much power!

It must be some mysterious instrument they now have: curve inflections.

8 posted on 08/31/2007 6:20:57 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer
Could you compare and contrast this move to his MexAmeriCanada policy for me please?

I'm sure we'd disagree, so why bother.

9 posted on 08/31/2007 6:31:58 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (I'm an endangered species. And I don't want your protection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
 
Are these actions going to correct the inflated home prices caused by sub-prime lending?  NO.
 
Are these actions going to create a pool of buyers who are able to qualify for financing on the purchase of homes at these inflated prices?  NO.
 
Are these actions going to reverse the decline in both new and existing home sales? NO.
 
What a crock.  The damage has been done.

10 posted on 08/31/2007 7:03:11 PM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
So not only is the American government going to provide health care and living expenses for every current American and every wannabe benefit-scrounger who manages to weasel his way into the country, now it's going to put a floor under world equity markets so that people who make highly leveraged bets on risky investments needn't worry about precipitous market declines wiping them out.

Isn't that special?

11 posted on 08/31/2007 7:07:15 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Wait until my Kids get the bill for the Genius of GWB!


12 posted on 08/31/2007 7:19:37 PM PDT by Afronaut (Press 2 for English - Thanks Mr. President !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I dunno, I'm thinkin' ya might need a few more fingers to fix this problem, GW.
 

13 posted on 08/31/2007 7:41:53 PM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
That's why we were heartened to hear Bush add the following: "The government's got a role to play. But it is limited. A federal bailout of lenders would only encourage a recurrence of the problem."

Good for the President!

14 posted on 08/31/2007 8:34:34 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VxH

“The damage has been done.”

What damage, and who caused it? What do you propose should have been done and when?


15 posted on 08/31/2007 10:12:08 PM PDT by JSteff (Reality= understanding you are not nearly important enough for the government to tap your phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut

“Wait until my Kids get the bill for the Genius of GWB!”

Yeah and the genius of that last 40 years of a spend crazy generation of politicians and citizens who voted then into office year after year.


16 posted on 08/31/2007 10:15:25 PM PDT by JSteff (Reality= understanding you are not nearly important enough for the government to tap your phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JSteff; Kaslin; TigerLikesRooster; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Hydroshock
[What damage, and who caused it?]

Demand for homes was increased by flooding the market with sub-prime capital.

The increase in demand inflated prices.   No surprises there, Supply and Demand - Economics 101.

Sup-prime capital has now been vaporized.  No one on Wall Street will touch new sub-prime securities.

Prices remain at or near their inflated highs but, without sub-prime financing, there are relatively few buyers who can qualify to buy at these high prices.

Many existing homeowners/mortgagees (especially those who bought using sub-prime financing) are now unable to refi because:
A: Their homes are no longer appreciating and creating sufficient equity to meet tightened  lender guidelines.
B: Sub-prime financing is gone.

Not being able to refi means they’ll no longer be able to rollover their credit card debt via home-equity.

The consumer spending that has been generated by home-equity will decrease.

Who caused it? Greedy people like Ambassador to the Netherlands Roland Arnall who is the owner of Ameriquest and who should be held criminally responsible.  

The internet is full of allegations made by former Ameriquest employees, including former Ameriquest CEO Wayne Lee, who allege systematic criminal conduct was going on at Ameriquest - going all the way to the top, with Arnall allegedly blocking Lee's attempts to implement reforms.

At the very least, President Bush should ask Roland Arnall  to resign his ambassadorship.

Why don't we see any arrests being reported?  Well, for one thing, probably because Ameriquest loves to settle these little problems out of court.

But more importantly, maybe it's because Federal investigative resources have been committed to preventing terrorism since 9/11 and, if the predators in the sub-prime market didn't deliberately take advantage of the situation, the focus on preventing terrorism certainly created an environment in which they were able to operate pretty much without interference.

How do you prevent this in the future?

Well, for one thing, checks should be put in place by the SEC to ensure that, when these loans are securitized, the FICO score on the loan docs for each loan sold to Wall Street is the same as the FICO score returned for that loan by the FICO reporting agencies.

See, if the FICO scores reported to Wall Street investors are BS, then the values of the resulting mortgage backed securities, valued using those FICO scores, are BS too.   That's probably not a good thing - Unless you happen be lucky enough to own derivatives that are betting on those securities going south.

Fun game these revolutionary geniuses cooked up, isn't it?

 

 


17 posted on 09/01/2007 2:50:56 AM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JSteff
Let the market do what it is best at. Working itself out. Most of these people would lose their homes anyway, people who make bad financial decisions keep making them usually.
18 posted on 09/01/2007 2:55:47 AM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VxH
You are right. Damages are done. People are just trying to figure out a way of postponing the inevitable disaster. That includes Bernanke and Bush.

The spins offered by PR team in this thread are really hilarious.

19 posted on 09/01/2007 3:07:12 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
[People are just trying to figure out a way of postponing the inevitable disaster.]

Well, covering up for the perpetrators isn’t an acceptable answer.

Arnall should be tossed overboard ASAP. He’s a political timebomb and he’s nothing but a liability for the president.

Besides, he’s not even really a Republican. Google him.

20 posted on 09/01/2007 3:25:14 AM PDT by VxH (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, and Three if by Wire Transfer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson