Oh man, get out the tinfoil. Here we go again...
If your an ER Doc I wouldn't want you diagnosing the war just on how you feel rather than what you should actually have knowledge of metaphorically speaking.
Treat this war like establishing your clients history and physicals. Gather all your facts before creating a treatment plan. Or if you want you can just treat liberals like all the addicts that come into ER’s Doctor shopping medication. Enabling is something liberals do well including being useful idiots for our enemy.
Keep the tinfoil. You might need it for the Cindy Sheehan crowd.
Really, now?
Suddenly the NYTs runs a article worrying about Saddams nuclear information being on the internet, Gee the NYTs tells people everyday that Saddam didn't have WMDs and was pretty much just a benevolent dictator. The next morning in Congress the dims were foaming at the mouth that this information needed to be hidden, Something they can't manage to do when it comes to actual rouge countries such as N Korea or Iran. Perhaps you have a better explaination for why a newspaper which has and will publish classified information which would harm the USAs interests suddenly finds some information which it thinks shouldn't be available. My experience tells me it was the other documents which were exposing the truth about Saddam, WMDs and terror organizations that the NYTs and the Dims wanted silenced. So what is it do you have some insight which shows why the NYTs suddenly admitted that Saddam had a nuclear program and that it was so dangerous it should never see the light of day? But bring very good information because as I said I followed the document release closely and I know many documents were not supporting the liberal mantra about Saddam. After all everyone knows the NYTs wouldn't run interference in promotion of the progressive agenda, like leaking very real programs which imperil not only the USAs security but agents in the field as well.