Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AN UNWANTED CAMPAIGN STOP FOR HILLARY IN 2008 - Los Angeles Superior Court
hillcap ^ | Sept. 2, 2007 | dfu

Posted on 09/02/2007 11:30:37 AM PDT by doug from upland

AN UNWANTED CAMPAIGN STOP FOR HILLARY IN 2008 - Los Angeles Superior Court

DATELINE Los Angeles
FreeRepublic.com
Doug from Upland

It is called the “Stanley Mosk Courthouse” after the man who was the longest serving justice on the California Supreme court, 37 years, from 1964-2001. The address is 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, California 90012.

During the campaign of 2008, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton will be paying a visit, but it won’t be by choice. She won’t be sitting in the lawyer chair. She will be sitting in the witness/defendant chair.

The case is Paul v Clinton, an historic civil case involving an impeached former president and sitting senator accused of a committing business fraud and collapsing a public company, Stan Lee Media. Yes, “Spiderman” Stan Lee. The case is expected to highlight information over which the mainstream media has maintained a cone of silence. That information is the greatest campaign finance fraud in history and the compromising of all three branches of government by a senator whose power is second only to that of the President of the United States. Many journalists, newspaper editors, and TV and radio news shows are in possession of a wealth of information about the case that has been discussed on the phone with them and sent to them. It includes compelling documents, photos, and video of Hillary Clinton.

On September 7, 2007, a 3-judge panel of the California Appellate Court will hear oral arguments in the case. Despite having been alerted, the mainstream media has not seen fit to report that news. Apparently it did not meet the criteria pursuant to the masthead logo of the NY TIMES - “All the news that’s fit to print.” Some news is more fit than others.

Clinton counsel David Kendall of the powerful Washington DC law firm, Williams and Connolly, will endeavor to convince the three justices that his client is not a felon, should remain protected by California’s anti-SLAPP law, and should not join her husband and others as defendants. The court should quickly make its decision, and discovery can then proceed. If Kendall loses, he may appeal to the California Supreme Court. That procedure is not expected to be a lengthy one, and the court ruled previously that it would not throw out the case regarding the former impeached president.

*** For full disclosure and in fairness to Mr. Kendall, I can say unequivocally that I have not seen him sit on his briefcase during any of the hearings I've attended.

Even if she is not brought back into the case as a defendant, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is going to be under oath. At a hearing in 2006, the Superior Court trial judge, Aurelio Munoz told Kendall, “I will entertain no motion that prevents Mrs. Clinton from testifying……did you hear that, Mr. Kendall?”

The court case of a former impeached president and a sitting senator might normally be a headline generator. Unfortunately, the shameless partisanship of the mainstream media is on display as never before. It is there for everyone to see.

As background for those who may not be familiar with the issues in the case, that would be viewers of CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC and readers of the NY Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, Chicago Sun Times, Boston Globe, Denver Post, Dallas Morning News, Seattle Post Intelligencer, Detroit Free Press, Philadelphia Inquirer, Minneapolis (Red)Star Tribune, The Plain Dealer, the Arizona Republic, Houston Chronicle, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Miami Herald, DesMoines Register, Arkansas Democrat Gazette, TIME Magazine, Newsweek, US News & World Report…….…well, you get the idea --- we are glad to be of service and welcome aboard. Here are some links that you might find helpful.

To anyone from the mainstream media who is just starting the learn about the greatest campaign finance fraud in history, I welcome you. We have regular and Decaf, and I’ll even supply some donuts. Get busy reading. Don’t you think it is about time to do your job? Does the word “journalist” mean something to you?

ALL OF THE DOCUMENTS: HILLCAP DOT ORG

EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION SITE with latest documentary trailer: EJFA DOT ORG

THE TIMELINE: This tells the story with links

THIS ILLEGAL DONATION (with photos) FROM A JAPANESE NATIONAL HAS NEVER BEEN RETURNED OR REPORTED

THE LARGEST DONOR IN HISTORY HAS THREE TIMES DEMANDED THAT HILLARY RETURN HIS ILLEGAL DONATION

OH MY, "SPIDERMAN" STAN LEE ADMITTING TO "EXCHANGING CHECKS" IN HIS VIDEO DEPOSITION....WHOOPS!

THE SMOKING GUN VIDEO. An agent of Hillary, a White House employee, helped solicit a 1.6 mil in-kind contribution. This video is evidence of Hillary's knowledge, involvement, approval, and participation.

HILLARY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE "IRREGULARITIES" REPORTED TO THE FBI FIELD OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES

HILLARY SPOKESMAN HOWARD WOLFSON HAS MAINTAINED THE LIE FOR SEVEN YEARS

TRUTH BOATING HILLARY CAMPAIGN - we need your help to break the news blockade of the mainstream media

PETER PAUL PASSES POLYGRAPH

ART MOORE'S WND STORY ABOUT THE TRUTH BOATING HILLARY CAMPAIGN

MOMMY DEAREST SETS UP CHELSEA FOR PERJURY

DO NOT MISS THE 7-PART "FRAUDULENT SENATOR" SERIES

AND FINALLY, JOIN ME IN A FUN SING-ALONG


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: cfr; crimeandpunishment; hillary; hillaryenabledrape; hillaryscandals; mccainfeingold; peterpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last
To: stm

I suspect Hillary will use her old stand-by “I can’t recall” “I don’t remember” blah, blah,blah. BTW who will be representing our side against David Kendall?


21 posted on 09/02/2007 11:47:03 AM PDT by Newfy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Psst, ask DFU about the plane that buzzed him ;)


22 posted on 09/02/2007 11:47:52 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO

Thanks for coming to visit, Sid. Now, go report to Hillary that the case goes forward and she indeed is going to be under oath.


23 posted on 09/02/2007 11:48:14 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Any laws or rules that will keep her from pursuing a Presidential bid?


24 posted on 09/02/2007 11:48:54 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: stm

Lots of zero’s. Ouch! That would really pierce Hillary’s heart. You know what a tightwad she is when it comes to their money.


25 posted on 09/02/2007 11:48:57 AM PDT by Newfy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All
Hillary committed perjury in her sworn declaration to the court. This time is different. Peter has several hours of her on home video. No one has ever had this kind of evidence before.
26 posted on 09/02/2007 11:49:34 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO

If you truly believe that; then we might as well stop the Election 2008 process and bow down to her holiness now.

The only way nothing will change is if we all stop trying.


27 posted on 09/02/2007 11:52:10 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

The beauty of this is that evidence is going to be presented in open court during the campaign. She has not made full disclosure to all of those donating money. They need to demand a refund.

We all know that she will never wear an orange jumpsuit, but what is going to happen to her natives when all of America finally sees the truth. When people like Streisand and Travolta and Cher are called to testify, this is going to get airplay.


28 posted on 09/02/2007 11:52:14 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Thank you, Doug, for all your tireless efforts. I pray to God that justice will be served and that the liberal baby-boomers’ dream candidate will be forever shut out of the Oval Office. Another Clinton presidency would destroy this nation. May the truth be revealed.


29 posted on 09/02/2007 11:53:18 AM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

it’s just about time for Hillary to have another bad case of temporary amnesia


30 posted on 09/02/2007 11:53:48 AM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2 (Thompson/ 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

You’re a great American, Doug.
Did any of the Sunday talk shows pick up it today? Silly question, I know, but it doesn’t hurt to ask.


31 posted on 09/02/2007 11:53:50 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Will this be televised? It should be since the people are going to be, possibly, voting for her. The people have the right to know everything that goes on in that trial. They have the right to know everything about a Presidential candidate.


32 posted on 09/02/2007 11:55:35 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

“I am speaking with three journalists who at least seem to be interested.”

Only 3?


33 posted on 09/02/2007 11:56:45 AM PDT by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Hey Doug, can you give me a link about how the Clintons destroyed Peter’s company? Thanks.


34 posted on 09/02/2007 11:58:03 AM PDT by John123 ("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Newfy

“I can’t recall”???? Isn’t that how they got Libby?


35 posted on 09/02/2007 11:58:06 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Depends on whether or not the DA wants to press them. A conviction in civil court is certainly a big help in a criminal court though.


36 posted on 09/02/2007 11:58:52 AM PDT by stm (Fred Thompson in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

>>>We all know that she will never wear an orange jumpsuit...

I think she will one day. The Hsu investigation is going to have ammo from this.


37 posted on 09/02/2007 12:00:28 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Streisand and Travolta and Cher

These folks were subpoenaed?

38 posted on 09/02/2007 12:00:55 PM PDT by John123 ("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: All
HILLARY'S LYING DECLARATION, PART 1

You might enjoy this. After claiming in her declaration that should could and would testify competently in the case, the next sentence was an absolute provable lie. She claimed that she met Peter Paul early in 2000.

In her deposition she will be confronted with home video footage of a fundraiser in early 2000 at the home of Zev Braun in Beverly Hills. On tape, she and Peter are recalling how they met in 1993 when he represented Fabio. He had Fabio chase her around the room and pick her up in a romance pose for photos. Bill even acknowledge the event in a speech the next year at the Italian American Foundation Dinner. Witnesses included Danny Devito and Dom DeLuise.

Would any of you fail to remember that for your sworn declaration. You don't make errors like that in a declaration. That is called lying.

39 posted on 09/02/2007 12:01:45 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

As they said, if they loose this case, Hillary that is, they will take it to the California Supreme Court. If they loose there, does it not go to the 9th Circuit Court and from their to the United States Supreme Court? If so, I hope it ends up the the US Supreme Court. Keep this in front of the American people and bring out everything on the Clinton’s. Maybe this is the culmination of everything they have done to this country.


40 posted on 09/02/2007 12:03:38 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson