Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cash Crisis Looms For N.M. Roads (Due to Richardson's Railroad!)
The Albuquerque Journal ^ | September 2, 2007 | Trip Jennings

Posted on 9/3/2007, 2:00:48 AM by CedarDave

SANTA FE— Will New Mexico jack up its gasoline taxes? How about some toll roads?

Those are some of the ideas under consideration by a task force as rising costs, dwindling federal funds and an increasingly expensive Rail Runner threaten New Mexico's road and highway projects with a financial train wreck.

~~ snip ~~

Some state lawmakers estimate New Mexico is already half a billion dollars short of money for dozens of highway construction projects around the state.

Some lawmakers are pointing to the money poured into the Rail Runner as evidence of previously misplaced priorities.

The commuter train is projected to cost $400 million— all of it coming from the state— by the time its leg between Bernalillo and Santa Fe is completed in December 2008, Faught said.

"There's a huge bunch of money that's going out of the highway department to pay for mass transit," said Jennings, the state senator who is co-chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, referring to the Rail Runner.

Critics of the Rail Runner have warned repeatedly that the Rail Runner will never pay for itself, meaning the state will have to subsidize operations.

Currently, only $1.4 million of the $9.5 million in annual operating costs comes from a combination of proceeds from riders' fares and fees the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. pays the state ...

A little over $8 million annually in federal air congestion management funding covers most of the costs, but that disappears in 2009.

The end of that funding means the state will have to assume all operating costs unless another revenue source is found ...

Making the situation worse, the state has given up on getting anytime soon the $75 million it had counted on in federal funding for the Rail Runner.

(Excerpt) Read more at abqjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: billrichardson; railrunner; richardson; richardsonsrailroad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
A number of us predicted this as far back as December 2005 (click on keyword Richardson's Railroad for details). Building a new commuter service that serves from several hundred to less than 2,500 passengers per day at a cost of almost half a billion dollars of state money diverted from necessary roads is insanity. NM is a very rural state with long distances between major communities. The RR was built to make Richardson look good as he runs for president. We will be paying through the nose for this boondoggle for many, many years to come.
1 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:00:52 AM by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

PING!


2 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:02:38 AM by CedarDave (Vietnam vet supporting today's freedom fighting men and women and their families.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Who passed it? It me guess - the Democrat Legislature.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

3 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:03:45 AM by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

4 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:06:49 AM by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
A Santa Fe to Albuquerque line might have made sense, but why was this route chosen?
5 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:08:47 AM by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Hey, Mythbusters got some use out of it.


6 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:10:01 AM by razorback-bert (Posted by Time's Man of the Year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

That’s ok, just have your guv call our guv(Perry), he has an all fired sure thing for paying for your roads.


7 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:11:25 AM by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
"There's a huge bunch of money that's going out of the highway department to pay for mass transit,"

That this statement should even be made by a New Mexico state official is ludricrous.

"Mass transit" and "New Mexico" are mutually exclusive.

8 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:11:43 AM by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
"There's a huge bunch of money that's going out of the highway department to pay for mass transit," said Jennings, the state senator who is co-chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, referring to the Rail Runner.

And I thought the "rail idiots" resided in Minnesota alone.

Silly me.

9 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:11:44 AM by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Socialists just love mass transit.


10 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:15:21 AM by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Critics of the Rail Runner have warned repeatedly that the Rail Runner will never pay for itself, meaning the state will have to subsidize operations.

A most perfect conveyance of a liberal boondoggle that is way to prominent in political focus these day's.

11 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:17:22 AM by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
One project has already been delayed: an I-25 widening project from Bernalillo to Albuquerque, which had been scheduled to begin next year.

This is the project that would have largely alleviated the need for the Rail Runner. This section of I-25 is still two-lane and has been little improved since construction in the 1960's or 70's. Improvement to three or four lanes ten years ago would have increased capacity so that the RR would be unlikely to even have been considered except for Richardson's presidential bid.

A [NM]DOT spokesman defended the commuter rail project as an important mass transit project for the future. "These individuals are out of touch with reality," said spokesman S.U. Mahesh. "It's time for these legislators to move away from the horse-and-buggy mentality and embrace the ideals of moving New Mexico forward."

I can't believe that this person said this! Passenger railroads were replaced by roads and cars because they were so inefficient. They make sense in dense urban corridors or between cities too close for efficient air service or with clogged highways (as admitted by the NMDOT itself, the stretch of 75 mph I-25 north of Bernalillo to Santa Fe is at 2/3 capacity and will be so for many years as the presence of numerous Indian pueblos will severely limit corridor growth). That is not the case in New Mexico. Of course, Richardson and Hillary and the other Democrats believe in the state restricting choices and dictating alternatives though they may be more costly and used by a very few.

12 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:21:21 AM by CedarDave (Vietnam vet supporting today's freedom fighting men and women and their families.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
This is a recurring pattern all over the United States. The socialists in control of "transportation" money routinely steal enormous amounts of money to fund rail programs. The streets and highways are left to crumble. The rail projects are universally under utilized and continue to drain road maintenance funds to keep the socialist paradise financed. Socialism fails every time it is attempted. The roads vs rail is a common example.
13 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:28:43 AM by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
Bernalillo is about 1/3 of the distance between ABQ and SF and the Rail Runner uses existing former BNSF trackage. The really high costs come with the construction of 15+ miles of new rail tracks from the area just north of Santo Domingo Pueblo up La Bajada hill and into the southern suburbs of Santa Fe along the median of I-25. Construction has not been started yet but Richardson's DOT says it will be completed by the end of next year.

In the meantime, charges of corruption have surfaced in that the company that just won the construction contract has contributed money and plane rides to Richardson's presidential campaign and a second FOB won the bid for development of the old Santa Fe rail yards [Richardson contributors have rail project interests ( Culture of Corruption?)]. At the end of last week, after this was revealed by the press, King Bill canceled award of the contract and will have it rebid.

14 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:40:16 AM by CedarDave (Vietnam vet supporting today's freedom fighting men and women and their families.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Who passed it? It me guess - the Democrat Legislature.

You are very perceptive! ;>))

15 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:41:11 AM by CedarDave (Vietnam vet supporting today's freedom fighting men and women and their families.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"Mass transit" and "New Mexico" are mutually exclusive.

So very true!

16 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:41:55 AM by CedarDave (Vietnam vet supporting today's freedom fighting men and women and their families.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Critics of the Rail Runner have warned repeatedly that the Rail Runner will never pay for itself, meaning the state will have to subsidize operations.
"A most perfect conveyance of a liberal boondoggle that is way to prominent in political focus these day's."

Fare recovery is less than 15%. Any Democrat-controlled big city that proposed such a minuscule recovery for "mass" transit would be skewered in the liberal press. Not a peep out of the press in ABQ, though the Journal has belatedly recognized that the RR is taking from needed road projects in the ABQ area.

BTW, a good article in the National Review from last December: Richardson Railroads Taxpayers (New Mexico)

17 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:51:01 AM by CedarDave (Vietnam vet supporting today's freedom fighting men and women and their families.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Fare recovery is less than 15%. Any Democrat-controlled big city that proposed such a minuscule recovery for "mass" transit would be skewered in the liberal press.

Outside the northeast corridor, the normal fare recovery rate for most big city "mass transit" systems is around 33%.

Bad enough. But the Rail Runner is less than half that.

18 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:55:06 AM by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Not to worry. It will be made up in property tax increases. I recently received a notice of a 1,000% increase in the assessment for a parcel of land I own there.


19 posted on 9/3/2007, 2:56:22 AM by shove_it (nonilligitimus carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
What kind of airport facilities does Santa Fe have? If I recall from a long time ago, it doesn't have an international airport, making Albuquerque the nearest. Is it planned to target travelers from the airport goint to Santa Fe?
20 posted on 9/3/2007, 3:17:30 AM by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson