Illegal Immigrants in Country
OTM Illegals In Country
Money Wired to Mexico Since Jan 2006
Money Wired to Latin America Since ‘01
Cost of Social Services for Illegal Immigrants Since 1996
Children of Illegals in Public Schools
Cost of Illegals in K-12 Since 1996
Illegal Immigrants Incarcerated
Cost of Incarcerations Since 2001
Illegal Immigrant Fugitives
Anchor Babies Since 2002
Skilled Jobs Taken by Illegal Immigrants
Excellent Website. They need to sell T Shirts. One with report illegals.com and one with immigrationcounters.com. I just forwarded links to a couple of dozen friends and contacts.
This is a ping list promoting Immigration Enforcement and Congressional Reform.
If you wish to be added or removed from this ping list, please contact me.
Just an early alert: The wife and I will be on the road the 15th through the 23rd visiting our new granddaughter. No ping list during that time...
Are Happy Days Here Again for GOP?
Thompson soft on illegals in Senate votes
(Illegal Alien) Pair Face Federal Drug Charges After I-75 Stop
Illegal Invasion: The Battle At The Border
Mexico Trying To Help Arellano Return To U.S.
Check Out A New LOGO of the "Government of The United States"
Unaccompanied immigrant minors face major consequences
The Unpleasant FACTS ARE
>>Both studies found that immigrants used government services at a greater rate than native-born residents did. The New Jersey study found, for instance, that the typical immigrant family received about $4,044 annually in government services, about 11 percent higher than the average native-born family. At the same time, immigrant households paid about 8 percent less in taxes. The net result was that the average native household generated an annual fiscal surplus of $232 to government, while the typical foreign household was a net burden of $1,484. The gap was even wider in California, where immigrant households produced a net deficit of $3,463 each, because so much of that states recent immigration had been in the form of low-wage, low-skill workers.
Though the study did not distinguish between legal and illegal immigrants, it did break down foreign-born households by the regions of the world from which they had come. In both states, the study found the steepest deficit in Latin American households, which in New Jersey consumed 26 percent more in government expenditures than the average native-born family, but paid 38 percent less in taxes. By contrast, immigrant households in New Jersey that hailed from Europe or Canada actually consumed, on average, less in government services than the typical native-born family, and paid nearly as much in taxes.<<
Source: http://www.city-journal.org/html/eon2007-08-29sm.html
ping