[Drango]

Yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

[jdm]

At 46, Kevin Leslie has never bothered with politics. After watching an interview with Paul during his 1988 campaign as candidate for the Libertarian Party, Leslie told himself, "If this guy ever runs for president again, I'll back him."

LOL. He has "never bothered with politics" but he was following Ron Paul and the Libertarian Party WAY BACK in 1988? That's classic, AP!

[CJ Wolf]

I think this has been posted before. Likely under a different title.

[elizabetty]

And a great deal of nausea.

[jonrick46]

Ron Paul Pot?

[P-Marlowe]

Separated at Birth.

Separated at Birth.

[MNJohnnie]

Avery Knapp is typical of the Paul Web supporter. A 28-year-old radiology resident, Knapp describes himself as a lifelong conservative who voted for President Bush in 2000 before growing disillusioned with the Iraq war and federal spending.

Funny, "a Lifelong Conservative" who happens to repeat verbatim the script Moveon.org teaches it Seminar Talk Radio callers to say.

So did the "Journalist" here bother to ask how this "limited Government Life long Conservative" felt about Paul's utter hypocrisy on earmarks? His defense of earmarks as "a necessary tool of Congress"? His $400 million in earmarks including Federal Money to shrimp farms? Paul is a demagogic fraud whose rabid ignorance on Foreign Policy is ONLY exceed by his hypocrisy on spending.

Ron Paul cannot get any more then 3% of the vote in any serious poll. He not only fails to connect with Freepers, he cannot connect in any serious way with average Americans. The Paulbots simply keep screaming their dogma to drown out the fact Paul is the candidate to no where.

The Paulbots are either old Dinocons Buchannites too arrogantly certain of their own intellectual infallibility to realize the stupidity of their Neo Isolationists dogmas in a post 09-11 world or Leftist Moveon.org Anti American types who think Paul will be a Trojan Horse they can use to factionalize the Conservative movement.

These people have never been, and never will be, Republican voters. You can see this in the fact that the bulk of his support on any poll here comes from NON members. People who are not Conservatives but merely troll this site at the encouragement of the Anti American Leftist fringe groups.

[tflabo]

Watching Ron Paul perform at the debates is not very inspiring...can’t envision him with that snively voice and sour looking mug as POTUS. He lacks WAR GUTS too.

[West Coast Conservative]

Ron Paul is a RINO. Him whining about the “neocons” last night made him sound like a typical DUmmie.

[HuntsvilleTxVeteran]

Where are the LIBELterians and Paulbearers?

[ejonesie22]

Passion, psychosis, it seems to be a very fine line at times...

[George W. Bush]

	Ron's weekly message [5 minutes audio, every Monday] • Podcast • Weekly archive • Toll-free 888-322-1414 •
	Free Republic Ron Paul Ping List: Join/Leave

Pingeroo, welcoming a few new members to our growing list...

[So Circumstanced]

Without leaders like Paul and Tancredo, the political landscape would be an insufferably blander wishy-washy fraudulent slurry of “Rudy -Mc- Romney”.
...And who needs more of that?

[cowtowney]

I wonder if any of the anti-Paul big government Republicans have ever even read the Constitution. How about starting with the 10th Amendment.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.overview.html

I know it’s an inconvenient document these days, but it bears a review every once in a while to see how far we have steered off course.

[Stallone]

Ross Perot 1992, who’s candidacy was a fabrication by the Liberal Media in support of Clinton.

MEET

Ron Paul 2008, who’s candidacy is a fabrication by the Liberal Media in support of Clinton.

[Leisler]

I don’t believe, and I’d be happy to be proved wrong, that the Republican Party ever had any core principals. Nothing in writing, a la the constitution. So, remembering the history of the party, and factually observing the Republican party like some animal in the jungle, I think I can say that the party is what it does, raise taxes, fairly patriotic, support big business and financial interest and avoid any notion of ideas or principals.

Don't ask me about the Democrats. I once took an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies.

As for Ron Paul, good that he is making the party hacks irritated. 2cents.

Mitt. Great guy, smart. Could be a good post ideological chair warmer until events or ideas capture the American imagination. He certainly doesn't have any. And, it could be, a la Senator Craig, that Mormons lose their sheen and come down with all us corrupt sinners.

Rudy. He's smart and would be entertaining if nothing else. Executive wise the most experienced by far. Mitt did noting with Democrat Massachusetts. Rudy, and others, turned Baghdad on the Hudson around.

McCain. Too Nixionian. Liked by the media, there, that did him in for me, the kiss of death from the press.

Ron Paul. A.K.A, he's right about a lot, but in the same way that shopping cart people are often right. And anyways, your average American don't like them thar ideas and wot not like that. It be mak'n my head hert!

I'd vote for anybody but the Beast From The East, Hitlery.

[Vanbasten]

He’s inspired passion in me. A passion to see him defeated. He is a disgrace to the republican party.

[Pistolshot]

After the ‘debate’ on Tuesday, Ron Paul ought to look to saving his seat in the House. He is done as a candidate for president.