Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYC: Channel 7 to cut 9/11 memorial coverage (to air "Regis" instead of reading victims' names)
The New York Daily News ^ | September 6, 2007 | RICHARD HUFF and CORKY SIEMASZKO

Posted on 09/07/2007 1:17:25 AM PDT by Stoat

Exclusive

Channel 7 to cut 9/11 memorial coverage


By RICHARD HUFF and CORKY SIEMASZKO
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITERS

Thursday, September 6th 2007, 6:46 PM


 
The city's top-rated TV station will slash its coverage of the Sept. 11 memorial ceremonies by dropping the most emotional part - the reading of the names of the victims.
WABC-TV says it's running "Live with Regis & Kelly" instead, and will follow it up with "Rachael Ray" and "The View," while every other broadcast station in town will cover the ceremony start to finish.

It marks the first time one of New York's local broadcast stations has opted not to broadcast the full reading of the 2,749 names.

"We decided to provide continuous coverage on our Digital Channel and Web site so our audience could have a choice between their regular programming and the Sept. 11 ceremony," Ch. 7 news director Kenny Plotnik told The Daily News.

"We hope to be respectful to the families and serve our audience," Plotnik said. "This is not about ratings, it's about what's right."

Bill Doyle, who heads the Coalition of 9/11 Families, said he was "very disappointed" by WABC's decision.

"The highlight of the ceremony is listening to your loved one's name being announced," said Doyle, whose son Joey was killed in the attacks. "Why would they even think of not broadcasting the entire event? I'm going to E-mail ABC and tell them this is not right."

"I can't believe ABC would not air the tribute," said Linda Selnow, whose sister, Nancy Farley, was killed. "We should turn ABC off the air!"

"I hope they'll reconsider," added Sally Regenhard, whose firefighter son Christian was killed. "Those names are a reminder of what we lost."

The station began preparing viewers about the change in coverage on Wednesday night - in carefully word updates delivered by anchor Bill Ritter.

"We are in fact providing live coverage of the initial ceremony beginning at 8:25 a.m." and through ‘Good Morning America' on Channel 7, Plotnik said.

That means Ritter will be at Ground Zero starting at 5 a.m. He'll remain there throughout the ceremony for the digital and web site coverage.

Viewers tuning in to Channel 7 for the ceremony will see Ritter until 7 a.m., when GMA starts. He'll return at 8:25 a.m. for the ceremony. Once the second moment of silence ends - shortly after 9 a.m. - the station will switch to regular programming.

It's a bold move in a city where many are still in mourning six years after the attacks. News directors have discussed scaling back the coverage, but only WABC-TV has taken that step.

"The fact of the matter is, there's still a hole in the ground," said Dan Forman, senior vice president of news at Channel 4, which is carrying the entire ceremony. "The healing is not complete. It strikes a chord in the community."

WCBS/Ch. 2, WNYW/Ch. 5, WWOR/Ch. 9 and WPIX/Ch. 11 have all confirmed they will broadcast the entire ceremony.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; 911ceremony; 911memorial; ceremony; memorial; newyork; nyc; sixthanniversary; television; tv
"The fact of the matter is, there's still a hole in the ground," said Dan Forman, senior vice president of news at Channel 4, which is carrying the entire ceremony. "The healing is not complete. It strikes a chord in the community."

It won't change after the "hole in the ground" is filled you idiot....it strikes a chord with all of America and with much of the world, not just "the community"..  And it will continue to do so long after the Global War On Terror is won, despite the efforts of you morons in the media to pander to those who never cared to begin with.

They don't get it, they never have, and they never will.

1 posted on 09/07/2007 1:17:28 AM PDT by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat
"The fact of the matter is, there's still a hole in the ground,"

Well, yeah, but aside from an attempt to say something "notable" that really doesn't contribute much, Dan.

2 posted on 09/07/2007 1:26:55 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Fred's here, the rest of the also-rans can go home now. =))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
the most emotional part - the reading of the names of the victims

I have never understood the point in reading that many names. God knows their names and so do their loved ones.

3 posted on 09/07/2007 1:47:53 AM PDT by donna (The United States Constitution and the Koran are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

09/11 doesn’t matter to the LameStream Media anymore. Now look, if it would be accompanied by a huge “Bush’s Fault” rally, they might cover it. But remembering the victims and our men and women at war right now? Fuggetaboutit.


4 posted on 09/07/2007 2:11:27 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Sorry, but I can't work up strong feelings over this. Te ceremony will still be carried in its entirety on four over-the-air TV channels. On cable, I'm sure one of the C-SPANs will air it in its entirety, as will the city's official channel, and possibly NY-1. Not to mention more Web sites than you can shake a stick at.
5 posted on 09/07/2007 2:36:28 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError; All
Te ceremony will still be carried in its entirety on four over-the-air TV channels.

From the article:

"News directors have discussed scaling back the coverage, but only WABC-TV has taken that step."

Translation:  "News directors of ALL of the networks have been itching to scale back, or better yet to dispense entirely with the ceremony for years, because it's a ratings loser among their core viewer demographic at that time of day, which is uneducated, unpatriotic, unemployed Liberals.".

First it will be the top-rated station (WABC) because they, being out in front, have the ability and room to experiment with new ideas. When their daytime, unemployed Liberal demographic doesn't squeal over this change, the other stations will soon follow suit.

This is merely the first domino in the line to fall.  Quickly, other stations will follow, and in a short time the only place that you will be able to see the entire ceremony will be on YouTube, uploaded by a private citizen with a camcorder.

In the meantime, the organizers of the event will see this trend and scale back the ceremony.

Eventually, the 9/11 Anniversary Ceremony will be little more than what is currently being done for Pearl Harbor Day, which in my view, at least, is not enough.

It is not my intent to accuse you or anyone else of being unpatriotic,  I only wish to suggest that we are only talking about a few minutes here, and I wish to ask the question:

Can't we spare just a few minutes of airtime here for a solemn remembrance of the essential struggle of Humanity in the 21st Century? 

I mean no unkindness, unfriendliness or disrespect;: I only wish to suggest that after only six years of mourning, we still have victims' families who are grieving over the loss of their husbands, wives, daughters, sons and children...and to these people, hearing the names of their loved ones on TV is very meaningful (see numerous quotes in the article)...are they not worth the rejection of Nielsen ratings for just a little while longer?

Flame me if you will, but I mean no unkindness.  I guess that this is all just a matter of being too soon for me, and I'm just a regular guy on the other side of our Nation..... I have no friends or loved ones who have any direct connection whatsoever with the events of 9/11..

6 posted on 09/07/2007 3:28:35 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
This bears repeating over and over and over.

Daryl Worley's
"Have You Forgotten?"

I hear people sayin'. We Don't need this war.
I say there's some things worth fightin' for.
What about our freedom, and this piece of ground?
We didn't get to keep 'em by backin' down.
They say we don't realize the mess we're gettin' in
Before you start preachin' let me ask you this my friend.

Chorus
Have you forgotten, how it felt that day?
To see your homeland under fire
And her people blown away
Have you forgotten, when those towers fell
We had neighbors still inside goin through a livin hell
And you say we shouldn't worry bout Bin Laden
Have you forgotten?

You took all the footage off my T.V.
Said it's too disturbin for you and me
It'll just breed anger is what the experts say
If it was up to me I'd show it everyday
Some say this country just out lookin' for a fight
Well after 9/11 man I'd have to say you're right.

Chorus
Have you forgotten, how it felt that day?
To see your homeland under fire
And her people blown away
Have you forgotten when those towers fell
We had neighbors still inside goin' through a livin' hell
And we vow to get the ones behind Bin Laden
Have you forgotten?

I've been there with the soldiers
Who've gone away to war
you can bet they remember just what they're fightin' for

Have you forgotten
All the people killed
Yes some went down like heroes
In that Pennsylvania field
Have you forgotten
About our Pentagon
All the loved ones that we lost
And those left to carry on
Don't you tell me not to worry 'bout Bin Laden

Have you forgotten?

Have you forgotten?

Have you forgotten?!

7 posted on 09/07/2007 4:13:18 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I can never hear those lyrics too many times. Thank you very much for posting :-)


8 posted on 09/07/2007 4:17:03 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

WE WILL NEVER FORGET !!!!!!!
OH except dont forget to commemorate the Holocaust !


9 posted on 09/07/2007 4:19:39 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Translation: "News directors of ALL of the networks have been itching to scale back, or better yet to dispense entirely with the ceremony for years, because it's a ratings loser among their core viewer demographic at that time of day, which is uneducated, unpatriotic, unemployed Liberals.".

It's probably a ratings loser for most demographics, to be honest. It would be inappropriate to skip the main part of the ceremony, but giving over hours of presumably commercial-free air time to the reading of the names on every channel is a lot to ask. Would you also insist that every AM and FM radio station pre-empt its programming to carry the ceremony?

the other stations will soon follow suit.

Eventually, I'm sure they will. Eventually, the city itself will scale back the anniversary observance except for big-number years. I'm sorry to sound callous, but life goes on. Some folks will feel this is too soon, but when will it be time? In ten years? Twenty? How long after all but a handful of people have stopped watching?

This is merely the first domino in the line to fall. Quickly, other stations will follow, and in a short time the only place that you will be able to see the entire ceremony will be on YouTube, uploaded by a private citizen with a camcorder.

I doubt it. You mention the Pearl Harbor commemoration -- that is carried in full on C-SPAN each year. Was it carried live on radio for hours in 1947, including reading the names of every victim?

The trend is for ever-greater proliferation of media on satellite, on cable and online, so that events with a small audience is available to those who want it. And in a year and a half, when the transition to digital TV is completed, every over-the-air channel will have multiple feeds at its disposal -- a capability WABC will use to carry the full ceremony on 9/11.

I agree that events like the 9/11 memorial should be available to the public, but I can't find any outrage that it won't be everywhere.

It is not my intent to accuse you or anyone else of being unpatriotic, I only wish to suggest that we are only talking about a few minutes here,

We're not talking about a few minutes. We're talking about the reading of some 2,800 names. My recollection of years past is that it took a couple of hours.

Can't we spare just a few minutes of airtime here for a solemn remembrance of the essential struggle of Humanity in the 21st Century?

Of course -- and as outlined in the article, WABC will carry the ceremony except the reading of the names.

I mean no unkindness, unfriendliness or disrespect;: I only wish to suggest that after only six years of mourning, we still have victims' families who are grieving over the loss of their husbands, wives, daughters, sons and children...and to these people, hearing the names of their loved ones on TV is very meaningful (see numerous quotes in the article)...are they not worth the rejection of Nielsen ratings for just a little while longer?

I'm all for sensitivity to the victims' friends and family, all of whom will have access to the full ceremony. i do not think it's reasonable to ask, as some vocal members of the victims' family groups seem to, that we bring everything else to a halt for everyone else.

10 posted on 09/07/2007 4:24:50 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: donna
I agree about the names. I don't think it makes for much of a ceremony, it's more of a way for the families to memorialize their loved ones (although some seem to have a need to stay at the center of attention IMO). Which is fine for them. Have the name reading ceremony by all means but it doesn't have to be broadcast on every network and cable channel.

There will be plenty of memorial ceremonies across the country and the airwaves will be filled will them all day long.

11 posted on 09/07/2007 4:25:59 AM PDT by NEPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError
Would you also insist that every AM and FM radio station pre-empt its programming to carry the ceremony?

I wasn't insisting on anything, I was merely asking a question.

Thank you for your time   :-)

12 posted on 09/07/2007 4:31:53 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Of course the MSM wants to bury what happened on 9/11. It is not very conducive to getting Hillary elected President if people are reminded that there are Islamofascists who's greatest desire is to kill everyone in this country because we exist. It also doesn't help to remind people that the Clinton White House did more to facilitate the rise of Islamofascism and Al Qaida then just about anyone else outside of Jimmy Carter.
13 posted on 09/07/2007 7:25:14 AM PDT by Nahanni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
UPDATE

Station changes course under pressure from families

Breaking News

WABC Channel 7 will air entire 9/11 ceremony

 

Station changes course under pressure from families

 


WABC/Ch. 7 has caved into pressure from families of 9/11 victims and will carry the entire Sept. 11 name-reading ceremony from lower Manhattan next Tuesday.

The change came after the Daily News reported the station's decision to shift live coverage to its digital cable channel and the internet, sparking outrage from victims' loved ones.

"I made some calls, I spoke to families, we got some emails," Ch. 7 news director Kenny Plotnik told The  News today.


"The real issue, there is really a terrible misunderstanding with digital channels. There seems to be a situation where people don't understand the concept of digital channels."

Most of the families Plotnik spoke to said they couldn't get the digital channel, and argued that if they couldn't see the full coverage on Ch. 7, they wouldn't get it. The top-rated station in New York had initially intended to switch to "Live with Regis & Kelly," "Rachael Ray" and "The View" when every other channel would be carrying the ceremony.

Backing off the hours-long name-reading ceremony is something that was discussed by news directors in town after the fifth anniversary of 9/11, but only Ch. 7 decided to take the step.

The station figured regular fare on the broadcast channel would be an alternative, while also serving those who wanted the coverage with the digital channel. But, many folks do not know the digital outlet exisits - it's on many local cable services including Time Warner and Comcast. Others said they didn't want to watch the ceremony on the computer.

"People were upset and confused," Plotnik told the News. "They were upset. It was upset and confusion. There wasn't any anger."

Plotnik said there would be other opportunities to use the digital channel down the road, but the 9/11 ceremony was not the time to test it. The station alerted viewers to the latest change today.

"We were trying to service everybody and give every body what they wanted," he said.

The Ground Zero ceremony gets underway at 8:25 a.m. Tuesday and all local stations are planning to go live with the full ceremony.


14 posted on 09/07/2007 10:20:33 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson