Posted on 09/08/2007 10:38:25 AM PDT by NapkinUser
Edited on 09/08/2007 2:50:08 PM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]
Good lord...
That's a lie.
Ron Turd is a traitor.
..crickets..
Does Paul remember Zarqawi? Does he remember the $25 million dollar bounty that the US placed on his head? Does he remember the jets dropping two five-hundred pound bombs on Zarqawi?
We don’t drop bombs on the local sheik that doesn’t claim allegiance to bin Laden.
(rolling eyes)
My wife has yelled at me for 26 years for leaving the seat up. I don’t even hear it anymore... my brain filters it right out.
Likewise, the Paulites don’t hear any reason anymore.
“should not be”?????
How about:
“must not be” or even the more sussinct
“is not” ...an option
Everyone. The Ron Paul threads are a complete trip, some of the best fun on Free Republic, but I am wondering, are we only putting embers on the the so called Ron Paul fire.
In my opinion, Ron Paul is like an internet hoax, it stays alive the more you pass it along. Paul’s newest tactic is the signs and slogans ‘Google Ron Paul’.. Every time we have a 800 post debate thread with Paul supporters only puts Ron Paul higher in Google analytics.
We know that the Paul supporters won’t be swayed, and they know we won’t be swayed. We are repeating the same things over and over.. and all this is doing is giving this third tier candidate far more attention than he deserves.
Why not crickets whenever Paul pops up here? Look what happened to all the pro-Rudy threads, they died out because all they were fed was the sound of crickets.
Why not just stop feeding the fire? Let it burn out. That’s just my thought... I’m sure others have differing opinions.
This man is a frightening kook. If he lived in my neighborhood, I would lock the doors and pull down the shades every time he walked by.
|
more waffling. “maybe surrender isnt that great but in some cases maybe we could possibly....blah blah”
Another thing:
“The only weapon of mass destruction in Iraq is our military presence”
Is this guy stupid?
You mean the crazy fundamentalist islamofacist homicidal truckbomber who killed 400 people and wiped out half of their village’s buildings in northern iraq doesn’t classify as a weapon of mass destruction, but our military, who are making friendships, handing out food and treats by kids who pursue them with cheerts everywhere, who open hospitals and elementary schools, who protect the informants who tell them about the real terrorists in their neighborhoods, they’re the bad guys? Our soldiers are the terrorists?
What planet does this guy live on?
Blame 9/11 on America, check.
Blame the military for homicide bombers, check.
Does Ronhammed Paulistani work for Osama? They seem to be in the same book club, and like to copy eachother’s talking points.
Ron Paul is clearly off his rocker.
Welcome to FR, how is it over at the HilaryCare War Room??
Pray for W and Our Troops
"Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts...these guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people.
-Mitt Romney
Brief Overview of Congressman Paul’s Record:
He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
lol. You might get a kick out of this: http://www.jokefrog.com/joke/0248.shtml
Welcome to about two years ago.
Take your term neocon and shove it...neocon is another word for antisemite, as Paul is....you are either conservative or not—I guess paleocons—not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.