Skip to comments.
I actively support HUNTER AND THOMPSON
Posted on 09/08/2007 9:24:29 PM PDT by Allan S.
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
What do you FR stalwarts think of these men as a potential pair ? Can they be remembered as a political LEWIS & CLARK "near" equal team in future history?
1
posted on
09/08/2007 9:24:33 PM PDT
by
Allan S.
To: Allan S.
Label as 'vanity' and we can discuss.
:)
2
posted on
09/08/2007 9:27:34 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: Allan S.
The Hillary/Obama ticket would best be countered by Fred/Condlezza. (My brother’s opinion, I agree)
3
posted on
09/08/2007 9:27:57 PM PDT
by
Rb ver. 2.0
(Reunite Gondwanaland!)
To: Allan S.
Can Hunter carry CA? Not likely, so he won’t be chosen as VP by FDT.
4
posted on
09/08/2007 9:28:08 PM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
To: Allan S.
Hunter Thompson will smile from wherever, as he would have for Bush/Cox.
5
posted on
09/08/2007 9:29:36 PM PDT
by
dighton
To: Rb ver. 2.0
Fred won’t choose her. She is too anti-Israel. He is a huge Israel supporter.
6
posted on
09/08/2007 9:30:09 PM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
To: Allan S.
I agree. I’m a bit more drastic in my appraisal of what needs to be done. I’d like to see a Hunter/Bolton Whitehouse.
7
posted on
09/08/2007 9:32:25 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: kinoxi
8
posted on
09/08/2007 9:32:56 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: Allan S.
a madness like the "Sanctuary City Movement". Come to think of it, Sanctuary is a religious term. The "movement" should be attacked as mixing Church and State. Up yours, ACLU!
9
posted on
09/08/2007 9:33:17 PM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
To: Allan S.
“VOTE FOR RON PAUL YOU STUPID INFIDELS!”
To: Allan S.
Hunter N. Thompson? Isn't he dead?
What's that? Oh...it's Hunter S. Thompson that's dead.
Never mind.
11
posted on
09/08/2007 9:34:53 PM PDT
by
L.N. Smithee
("Norman Hsu:" Chinese for "Abramoff")
To: Allan S.
“”What do you FR stalwarts think of these men as a potential pair ?””
============================================================Since this is FR, we would all love exactly that team, except for the tiny Paul and Romney clubs.
12
posted on
09/08/2007 9:35:06 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(How do you recognize a cult member?)
To: Allan S.
Hunter as VP is wasted. He should be Fred’s DefSec.
13
posted on
09/08/2007 9:36:15 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Why don’t you just admit that you’re a Paulestinian and get it over with?
To: Allan S.; Rb ver. 2.0
I think Hunter would make a better Secretary of Defense.
With the exception of Cheney, the VP slot has historically been a very weak position.
I disagree about Condi. We need fresh talent and a clean break from the Bush administration. It’s the only way to break the traditional changing of party hands that happens with the White House after 2 terms.
15
posted on
09/08/2007 9:38:28 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
("The Democrats are the party of slavery." —Cindy Sheehan)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
VOTE FOR RON PAUL YOU STUPID INFIDELS! The slogan of the Paulestinians!
16
posted on
09/08/2007 9:38:29 PM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
My concern about Condlezza is the same I have for everyone brought up through the system during the previous long war.
That entire era was all about seeking stasis through compromise with the sword of damocles (MAD) hanging over everything.
Ms Rice may well be a solid, stalwart person fully adjusted to this new war’s reality, but... then again, maybe not.
I have a lot more faith in Mr. Thompson as a politician with some baseline honor, and Mr. Hunter as a warrior with some political ability. Both of these men were also raised up during the decades of compromise and stasis seeking, but both have also given indications of being more fully aware of what we are up against, and what must be done, than others of their generation.
That’s my personal take on the issue at this moment. Not that it’s worth anything to anyone but myself.
All statements of persons demonstrating honor and/or integrity are subject to change as said persons talk their talk and provide more indications of how their minds function, or dont.
17
posted on
09/08/2007 9:38:37 PM PDT
by
Grimmy
(equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
To: fieldmarshaldj
To: End Times Crusader
Don’t worry. He’s admitted it before, and he’ll admit it again.
19
posted on
09/08/2007 9:39:41 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
("The Democrats are the party of slavery." —Cindy Sheehan)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Didn’t I just see you on Geraldo?
20
posted on
09/08/2007 9:41:20 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
("The Democrats are the party of slavery." —Cindy Sheehan)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson