Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Oh! Well, nevermind!
1 posted on 09/11/2007 8:50:19 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Of course he’s going to distance himself from it, it blew up in his face. I don’t know how much he approved of it but I have a hard time thinking he didn’t know about it.


2 posted on 09/11/2007 8:54:58 AM PDT by stm (Fred Thompson in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No apology, just “not our fault.”

Huh.


3 posted on 09/11/2007 8:54:58 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Plausible deniability.


4 posted on 09/11/2007 8:55:17 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This would be far more believable if Romney-affiliated groups haven't been attempting to smear Thompson for over five months now.

Of course the campaign is going to deny it, it was set up with "plausible deniability" from the get-go.

But let's assume Romney's telling the truth here, for the sake of argument. He has a remarkable tendency to choose losers for his top state operatives: Larry Craig of Idaho (state chair) gets busted for soliciting gay sex in a public men's room, and now Wesley Donehue of South Carolina (top state advisor) gets caught smearing Thompson with juvenile tactics. Some "CEO" there.

5 posted on 09/11/2007 8:55:59 AM PDT by kevkrom (The religion of global warming: "There is no goddess but Gaia and Al Gore is her profit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Yah, sure, Romney didn't get even a chuckle out of the "shhhhh, remember, you never have seen this" review of the dirty tricks of his campaign. Candidates NEVER see this stuff.

I'm shocked . . .

6 posted on 09/11/2007 8:56:18 AM PDT by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Web site, PhoneyFred.org, was created by Wesley Donehue, a business partner of Warren Tompkins, a South Carolina political operative on the Romney payroll and Romney's top adviser in the early voting state.

The site was created without the knowledge of Tompkins or Romney, said Romney spokesman Kevin Madden.

Uh, OK. So, this guy is a business partner of Tompkins, but neither Tompkins nor Romney knew of this. Either Tompkins/Romney are very inept businessmen, or very disingenuous at spin.

7 posted on 09/11/2007 8:57:48 AM PDT by bcsco ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I bet this one won’t get posted 5 times by Fredheads.


8 posted on 09/11/2007 8:58:54 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Romney does it correctly, millions more will view the page than if he had not publicized it.

Then they can take it down and move on to another publicity campaign.

“Hey everybody, look at this site I don’t approve of!”


10 posted on 09/11/2007 8:59:07 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Romney needs to disavow this site and its creator. I expect that will be said pretty prominently to the press.

Romney likes to make his own attacks personally, I've noticed. It's part of how he hopes to demonstrate that he's willing to take the fight to the Dims as our nominee. So this undermines that theme of his campaign as well as his image as a "clean" candidate who doesn't go for dirty-tricks campaigns.
11 posted on 09/11/2007 8:59:11 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Oh, criminy. He's trotting out the "meddlesome priest" defense.

Way to go, Mitt!

13 posted on 09/11/2007 8:59:38 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Romney didn’t approve the creation of the web site?

You’ve got to be kidding.


16 posted on 09/11/2007 9:01:45 AM PDT by upchuck (The President has an Agenda, and it's not promoting The Land of the Free and The Home of the Brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
we discovered it was created by an individual who works at an Internet firm who parked the site temporarily on the company server space of a firm whose financial partner is a consultant to the campaign — Mr. Tompkins," said Madden, who later identified the individual as Donehue. "Mr. Tompkins did not know about the development of the site."

************

Dirty politics, and Romney's guy is involved, regardless of how they spin it.

20 posted on 09/11/2007 9:03:47 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What SISSIES !!!!

Negative Campaigning just isn’t what it used to be...

Bush castrated McCain and everyone KNEW it was Bush doing it.

But NOOOO... A Spoof site is all “Bad Mitt Baaaaaad Mitt”.

BAH.

I wish I had seen it... It was probably FUNNY !!

Get a life for the luv !!


36 posted on 09/11/2007 9:23:14 AM PDT by RachelFaith (Doing NOTHING... about the illegals already here IS Amnesty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is this the Hillary Clinton defence for the Republican side? I don’t know. I don’t remember.


37 posted on 09/11/2007 9:25:00 AM PDT by hoosierpearl (To God be the glory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeah right!

Not that I care, I wasn’t pulling for Romney anyway.


40 posted on 09/11/2007 9:26:08 AM PDT by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Oh! Well, nevermind!

The question is, is this answer the flip are is it the flop. One would be opposite the other. LOL

44 posted on 09/11/2007 9:33:32 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Oh! Well, nevermind!

The question is, is this answer the flip are is it the flop. One would be opposite the other. LOL

45 posted on 09/11/2007 9:33:46 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I also heard the democrats didn't approve of that shameful moveon.org ad in the NYSlimes attacking General Patraeus too! Glad there's still some people with morals in this world! /sarc
47 posted on 09/11/2007 9:36:51 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom, Bible Thumper and Proud to be an American! WIN, FRED, WIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Plausible deniability?


48 posted on 09/11/2007 9:37:54 AM PDT by Mr J (All IMHO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

...and hildebeast didn’t know that she had taken illegal chicom money... or that her hollyweird friends had given illegally to her! Yeah... right Mitt!

LLS


49 posted on 09/11/2007 9:40:08 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson