The title of the article is nothing but a hit piece of dubious credibility.
You remind me of a child walking his pet on the street. The pet defecates on the sidewalk. Rather than dispose of it in the trash, the child then picks up the scat and throws it at a well-dressed adult passer-by. The horrified adult asks the child, “Why did you throw that at me ?” The child says, “Well, don’t blame me, it’s not mine. It was already there.”
Your repeating unproven sleazy allegations doesn’t speak well for you, madam.
Did you even read the article?
I repeat, I did not make the allegations. They are out there. Some of the article is asserted as fact, without qualification. They wouldn’t dare do that if they weren’t pretty darn sure it was true. And there haven’t been any denials from the Thompson camp.
That isn’t the first place I’ve seen those particular allegations regarding Fred’s basically amoral behavior as a single man. I guess you think that’s okay. But, he has admitted that in other places.
A mistress doesn’t necessarily have to be carrying on with a married man. Actually, the real qualifier is whether he was supporting her. I think Mosbacher has a lot of money of her own. So maybe “former bed partner” is a better description. Does that make you feel better?
There are quotes from Fred’s first wife’s brother, strongly implying that the first marriage broke up because of adultery. If that weren’t so, the brother simply would have answered “No.” Again, there are no refutations of these quotes.
The stuff about his wife has been printed in other places, not just this article.
Look, maybe none of this will make a difference. Maybe the two of them can carry the “family values” banner along with their baggage.
But, we shouldn’t bury our heads in the sand and act as if it isn’t out there.
For the record, your snarling accusation notwithstanding, I am not a Romney supporter.