Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/12/2007 7:21:51 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: presidio9

I might have been able to repect his view in respect to the troops in Iraq, I.E. get then out as soon as possible(assuming we have the situation stable over there), but in the same breath he wants to pull out all our troops around the world.

To say nothing of saying that Iran wasn’t a problem and we should just let them be. This guy is a loon of the highest order.


31 posted on 09/12/2007 7:40:41 AM PDT by Post-Neolithic (Money only makes Communists rich Communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
on stands that used to define "conservative" in America -- defense of individual liberties, a minimalist federal government and freedom from foreign entanglements.

Not anymore. 'Conservative' is now defined by whatever the administration says it is for that day.

32 posted on 09/12/2007 7:40:46 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

34 posted on 09/12/2007 7:41:45 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
...Failing to get elected as a Libertarian Party presidential candidate, Rep. Ron Paul turned to the Republican Party to win Texas' 14th Congressional District...

Throw the bum out!

37 posted on 09/12/2007 7:43:19 AM PDT by McGruff (If I can't have Cheney, Fred will have to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Thanks, I glad to see a recent statement specifically stating his intent to withdraw from Europe, Japan and Korea as well as the mideast.

My only question, do we stay in Puerto Rico, FALN terrorists motivated by the occupation being a fact. There's hope for the Aztlan movement as well.

41 posted on 09/12/2007 7:46:44 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Such sentiments make Paul the odd man out in GOP debates. Other candidates have been seen smirking as he speaks.

I'm not a candidate, but when he speaks, I'm usually smirking too.

44 posted on 09/12/2007 7:52:19 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
"I call it a non-interventionist, constitutional foreign policy," he said Tuesday. "We should have a strong national defense. But we should stay out of other countries' internal affairs. Our role is not nation building, and not to be world policeman."

That's exactly where the majority of the American public stands on the subject, and the other GOP candidates ignore this at their peril. Ron Paul isn't going to win the nomination based on this belief, but the eventual Republican nominee might well lose the general election over it.

50 posted on 09/12/2007 7:59:04 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

What a coincidence! I want Ron Paul to go home too!! ;.)


57 posted on 09/12/2007 8:04:59 AM PDT by Primetimedonna ( It's SAN FRANCISCO, not Frisco. Charter member of the Snowflakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

He does? Well, I want RuPaul to go home.


59 posted on 09/12/2007 8:06:40 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (SNOW-Flake, Levinte, Steve-adore and FREDHEAD~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Our role is not...to be world policeman."

If we don't do it, someone else will. And I don't think anyone is going to like the results.

We had the luxury of being isolationist in the early part of our history, but technological advances have made it so that isolationism is no longer feasible.

64 posted on 09/12/2007 8:09:06 AM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

“And U.S. troops in Europe?

“I would get them home,” Paul said in an interview Tuesday. “Having them stationed abroad doesn’t serve our national interest, and that goes for forces in Japan and Korea. “

As if we needed further proof that this guy is an idiot when it comes to foreign policy.

When you become president, you cannot summarily deny decades of commitments made by those whom you may not have agreed with.


69 posted on 09/12/2007 8:14:38 AM PDT by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

I cannot believe I once supported this buffoon.

78 posted on 09/12/2007 8:37:49 AM PDT by meandog (I'm one of the FEW and the BRAVE FReepers still supporting John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Propagandists of the world unite. Imagine someone putting America before world interests. This idea must be destroyed.

"Although described as a libertarian, the physician-politician is a throwback on stands that used to define "conservative" in America -- defense of individual liberties, a minimalist federal government and freedom from foreign entanglements. "I call it a non-interventionist, constitutional foreign policy," he said Tuesday. "We should have a strong national defense. But we should stay out of other countries' internal affairs. Our role is not nation building, and not to be world policeman." "

Sounds like Paul doesn't want the USA to follow England's descent from 'the Sun never sets on the British Empire' to 'God save the Queen'. An increasing number of Americans will agree.

100 posted on 09/12/2007 9:08:06 AM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

“Right now, nobody threatens our national security.”

Except Ron Paul.


110 posted on 09/12/2007 9:18:09 AM PDT by toddlintown (Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

this man has to be STOPPED!


129 posted on 09/12/2007 9:32:19 AM PDT by pollywog (Joshua 1:9 Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
"Asked his policy on U.S. troops fighting in Iraq, the Texas congressman, now serving his 10th last term, replies:..."

Ron Paul's district ain't made up of a bunch of liberal metrosexuals. This will be his last term.

153 posted on 09/12/2007 9:44:19 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

I haven’t read through this thread yet and I probably won’t, because I know what’s going to happen and I don’t need to read the garbage some will post as “comments.”

Several years ago I stood on the local street as a counter-demonstrator to the first Million Mom March. There weren’t many of us but the police presence indicated they thought we all had machine guns ready to mow down those misguided moms. Instead, we stood quietly with our signs while enduring the occasional insult from the marchers. At one point though, some guy came running from the column, stopped in front of us and proceeded to swear at us as if we were the lowest form of life on the planet. Had the police not been so close by I’m sure one of us would have taken the time to “chastise” him for his insults. With the police just a few steps away though we just stood there while he litterally frothed at the mouth, spitting and screaming invectives at us. This was a man with whom no one could reason so we didn’t even try. His mind was so set on what he thought he was accomplishing there was no room for reasonable discussion.

Some of the anti-Paul posters here are much the same. Their minds are made up. To them, Ron Paul is nothing short of the Anti-Christ and they will repeat any bad publicity he has had, even attributing statements to him that he has never made. They are so certain of their positions they won’t even take the time to read the speeches he has made, preferring to read the “reports” of speeches he has made - reports by people who share their views on Dr. Paul. Fortunately, the web doesn’t transmit spittle or their posts would be as wet as the shirt of that idiot protestor who spent several minutes making a fool of himself.


157 posted on 09/12/2007 9:46:19 AM PDT by oldfart (The most dangerous man is the one who has nothing left to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Many have already commented on this, but “Right now, nobody threatens our national security” is the single most stupid, naive, insane, delusional comment made by anyone running for POTUS, including the dems.


202 posted on 09/12/2007 10:19:39 AM PDT by bobsatwork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9; All
Amid a lineup of what ought to be called "big government conservatives," Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul stands out like the Lonesome End on Army's 1950s football teams south bound end of a north bound donkey.

There, corrected it.

330 posted on 09/12/2007 12:13:00 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9; All
GOP's Looney Toon's Ron Paul wants all troops home

There, fixed that one too.

336 posted on 09/12/2007 12:19:28 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson