And as an aside, I fail to see the appeal of Thompson outside of his voice and his mannerisms. You claim you know Romney being in Mass. I voted for Thompson and was represented by him as a Tennesseean. Not voting for him in the Primary.
A difference of opinions, I guess.
And as an aside, I fail to see the appeal of Romney outside of his hair and his uh, hair.
Interesting how you keep qualifying or disqualifying people based on voice and mannerisms. Who cares? I care about facts and votes and actions. I couldn't care less how Thompson looks or acts--I care about his positions, which he hasn't changed repeatedly as Romney has.
Romney was for gay civil unions--not sure where he stands on them now--and against Don't Ask Don't Tell--now he's for DADT.
He used to be pro-choice. Now he's pro-life.
He was for gun control. Now he's an NRA life member.
He was for stem-cell research (because of his grandchild and wife's illnesses). Now he's against it.
He's against illegal immigration. He hires illegals to take care of his lawn.
And if one wants to bring up Fred Thompson's flip-flop on McCain-Feingold, then how about Romney's flip-flop on McCain-Kennedy?
I fail to see the appeal of Romney outside of his smile and his admittedly ingratiating personality, which seems to demolish rational behavior in some folks. He's a smart man. I just don't see why he should be president.