Skip to comments.
Bush Settles on Mukasey to Replace Gonzales
WAPOST ^
| Sunday, September 16, 2007; 5:02 PM
| Michael Abramowitz and Dan Eggen
Posted on 09/16/2007 3:25:02 PM PDT by paltz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-318 next last
To: jdm
41
posted on
09/16/2007 4:20:28 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: umgud
Chuckie already suggested him.
42
posted on
09/16/2007 4:21:36 PM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: paltz; All
http://schumer.senate.gov/SchumerWebsite/pressroom/press_releases/PR01772.html ---------------------------
June 10, 2003
Dear Mr. President:
blah blah blah
The candidates I would advise you to consider are:
The Honorable Arlen Specter, Republican Senator from Pennsylvania.
The Honorable Ann Williams, Judge, Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, nominated by President Ronald Reagan to the Northern District of Illinois.
The Honorable Edward Prado. Judge, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, nominated by you and unanimously confirmed by the 108th Senate.
The Honorable Michael Mukasey, Judge, Southern District of New York, nominated by President Ronald Reagan.
The Honorable Stanley Marcus, Judge, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, nominated by President Ronald Reagan.
All of these individuals appear to be legally excellent, ideologically moderate, and several of them would add diversity to the Court. All of them have a history of bipartisan support, are within the mainstream, and have demonstrated a commitment to the rule of law.
Blah blah blah.
My profound hope is that, should there be a Supreme Court vacancy this summer, you will nominate a candidate who will unite us, not divide us. I am confident that by working together we can achieve that goal. I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
Charles E. Schumer
United States Senator
---------------------------
43
posted on
09/16/2007 4:27:30 PM PDT
by
M203M4
(May the cankles of Herr Heinous rest lightly upon us)
To: paltz
Reid will be crowing. That’s what irks me about this pick.
I suppose the WH decided that since there are only 15 1/2 months left, they might as well compromise, rather than fight.
44
posted on
09/16/2007 4:29:21 PM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: paltz
He’s described as a “law and order Conservative”.
Sounds good to me.
To: paltz
46
posted on
09/16/2007 4:36:42 PM PDT
by
RDTF
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but Democrats believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
To: Southack
Respectfully, I'm not convinced. National Review Online has moved further Left over the past 2-3 years. And I believe NRO is the source for that piece.
47
posted on
09/16/2007 4:40:13 PM PDT
by
jdm
To: indylindy
Mukasey is quite conservative and deeply religious. Frankly, I am shocked that Schumer approves of him.
48
posted on
09/16/2007 4:45:44 PM PDT
by
freespirited
(The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop. -- P.J. O'Rourke)
To: freespirited
THAT ALONE, should worry you.
49
posted on
09/16/2007 4:46:41 PM PDT
by
dforest
(Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
To: M203M4
If Chuckie thinks of him as being as good as Arlen...
oh well. Another chance to argue for conservatism has been shot down in bipartisan fashion.
And I’m guessing it won’t take more than a few weeks after his confirmation for the Dems to attack him anyway.
50
posted on
09/16/2007 4:46:52 PM PDT
by
Mr Rogers
(I'm agnostic on evolution, but sit ups are from Hell!)
To: Leroy S. Mort
In the 1996 sentencing of co-conspirators in the case, Mukasey accused the sheik of trying to spread death "in a scale unseen in this country since the Civil War." He then sentenced the blind sheik to life.He sounds OK to me! I don't blame the President for not wanting to waste time and give the Democrats the opportunity to bloviate for months about Ted Olson. Whoever is Attorney General will have to deal with terrorism cases; why not someone who's already done that?
51
posted on
09/16/2007 4:48:52 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: STARWISE
“So, youd want more hearings, more rancor, more MSM interloping and attacking .... just how many simultaneous, ongoing partisan battles to appease their base would be acceptable to you in a time of war?”
Oh excuse me, you’re right — George Bush should just fold up his tent and let Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi be the new co-Presidents. It will be a LOT better than those simultaneous, ongoing partisan battles.
52
posted on
09/16/2007 4:49:22 PM PDT
by
vetsvette
(Bring Him Back)
To: vetsvette
Judge Mukasey might be a fine choice, but the President reportably wanted Ted Olson and chickened out on his first choice.Do you know this to be true, or is it something someone reported as 'possible'? Everyone has been assuming, or hoping it was Ted Olson, but I never heard the President say one way or the other.
53
posted on
09/16/2007 4:51:59 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: jdm
This turkey of a judge is a big fan of Rooty JulieAnnie and Chuckie Schumer loves him. Can you spell anti- gun liberal puke?
54
posted on
09/16/2007 4:52:29 PM PDT
by
Beagle8U
(FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: webheart
I admit Bush has taken a lot of crap off the Dems for the "Good of the Country." I don't know what the answer is, but I think a good fight wouldn't be a bad thing.I'd prefer he spend his time on problems with the Middle East and North Korea. Let the Democrats stew in their own juices about not being able to beat up on Bush for his AG choice.
55
posted on
09/16/2007 4:54:17 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: Leroy S. Mort
The 66-year-old New York native, who is a legal adviser to GOP presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani, would take charge of a Justice Department A campaign staffer of the most liberal Republican presidential candidate throughout all history? Hmmm...
56
posted on
09/16/2007 4:58:02 PM PDT
by
Spiff
To: webheart
I admit Bush has taken a lot of crap off the Dems for the "Good of the Country." I don't know what the answer is, but I think a good fight wouldn't be a bad thing.I'd prefer he spend his time on problems with the Middle East and North Korea. Let the Democrats stew in their own juices about not being able to beat up on Bush for his AG choice.
57
posted on
09/16/2007 5:00:08 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: webheart
it’s been a constant fight
58
posted on
09/16/2007 5:04:44 PM PDT
by
elpadre
To: vetsvette
Lets be honest with the dems he doesnt stand a chance and when the spineless repubs were in the majority they were scared of the dems too
59
posted on
09/16/2007 5:05:15 PM PDT
by
italianquaker
(Is there anything Ron Paul doesn't blame the USA for?)
To: jdm
the anti anites are our in full force..... just sitting back like vultures to devour our own.
60
posted on
09/16/2007 5:05:18 PM PDT
by
JFC
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-318 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson