Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Nixes Bill Giving D.C. House Seat
Associated Press ^ | September 18, 2007

Posted on 09/18/2007 2:32:40 PM PDT by presidio9

A bill that would have given District of Columbia residents their first-ever member of Congress died in the Senate on Tuesday, dashing hopes of finally gaining full voting rights after a 206-year wait.

Senators voted 57-42, just three votes short of the 60 needed to move the measure forward. The bill would have created two new House seats: One for the city of about 600,000 people and one for Utah, which narrowly missed out on a fourth seat after the last census.

The procedural vote effectively killed the best chance in decades to win the District a full-fledged House member. The city has been denied voting rights in Congress since 1801, making it the only major capital city in the world where citizens are denied a vote in the nation's representative body of government.

Advocates had hoped to resolve what they call a "national disgrace" and the most important civil rights issue of the era.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 110th; dc; statehood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 09/18/2007 2:32:42 PM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

So there will be no Senator Marion Berry for a while longer.


2 posted on 09/18/2007 2:34:30 PM PDT by ConservativeMajority (John Kerry - traitor then, traitor now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority
What I’ve been wondering is wouldn’t this require a Constitutional Amendment?
3 posted on 09/18/2007 2:40:13 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I’ll cut a deal with the Dems. None of this “House seat for Utah” nonsense.

DC gets a House seat if and only if no government employee is allowed to vote in any federal, state, or municipal election.


4 posted on 09/18/2007 2:40:21 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

So now we’re on the other side of the fence, glad to have that 60-vote requirement.


5 posted on 09/18/2007 2:46:29 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
What I’ve been wondering is wouldn’t this require a Constitutional Amendment?

Yes - assuming the Constitution is still in effect.

6 posted on 09/18/2007 2:49:45 PM PDT by BusterBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BusterBear

Listen, I know its a living document and all, but the part where the Constitution says that the representatives shall come from the several states, and that the people of those states shall vote on them, doesn’t appear to leave much wiggle room. I’m pretty sure that the District of Columbia isn’t a state. How did this bill manage to get 47 votes in the Senate?


7 posted on 09/18/2007 2:55:59 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Since when have laws mattered to the Left and Looters?


8 posted on 09/18/2007 2:58:18 PM PDT by Clock King (Bring the noise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

If the residents of DC want a vote in Congress, they can move across the line to Maryland or Virginia. Both Maryland counties, Montgomery and Prince George’s, would love to have many more Democrat voters.


9 posted on 09/18/2007 3:08:17 PM PDT by quikdrw (Life is tough....it's even tougher if you are stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
The actual vote

Cosponsors (includes Clinton and Obama).

10 posted on 09/18/2007 3:15:49 PM PDT by RagingBull (Talent does what it can; genius does what it must)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
The city has been denied voting rights in Congress since 1801, making it the only major capital city in the world where citizens are denied a vote in the nation's representative body of government.

The AP strikes again. If any other major capital city in the world had the US Constitution as it basis for law, they too would not be able to vote.

Aint no denying that.

11 posted on 09/18/2007 3:24:06 PM PDT by capydick (Suit Up. Enter the Arena. Play the Game. Play Your Sport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quikdrw

They don’t have to move. Residents of Arlington and Alexandria VA vote for their senators and congressmen. Those areas were retroceded back to Virginia in 1847.

Congress could retrocede the rest of the District to Maryland tomorrow. It’s not about the vote - it’s about a sure Democrat seat in the House and eventually two in the Senate.

What is sad is the moron Republicans that lined up behind this suicide pact; Hatch, Davis, Kemp. Republicans are still the stupid party.


12 posted on 09/18/2007 3:28:52 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: oblomov
DC gets a House seat if and only if no government employee is allowed to vote in any federal, state, or municipal election.

Not many live in that shithole except folks who are professional criminals...like Marion Berry

13 posted on 09/18/2007 3:35:40 PM PDT by RVN Airplane Driver ("To be born into freedom is an accident; to die in freedom is an obligation..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Probably won’t have the 40 votes in the next congress, so DC gets its seat then. Once DC has a Representative, Rats will argue that it just makes sense for them to have 2 Senators. After all, DC surely has a larger population than, say, Alaska.


14 posted on 09/18/2007 3:37:47 PM PDT by Otho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Seems like Utah will get that extra representative at the next census anyhow.


15 posted on 09/18/2007 3:39:38 PM PDT by MovementConservative (Terminate the Duke 88)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Otho

We’ll have more than 40 seats. Things are going to turn around.


16 posted on 09/18/2007 3:46:38 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MovementConservative

Right...and it’s quite likely seat 436 would go to a D.


17 posted on 09/18/2007 3:48:10 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Taxation without representation


18 posted on 09/18/2007 4:30:42 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (If you can't say something intelligent, don't say anything at all. Congress goes silent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

D.C. has to come in as a State to have that right. Sheesh what MORONS the bill supporters are.


19 posted on 09/18/2007 4:30:51 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Otho; samtheman
Probably won’t have the 40 votes in the next congress
Are you kidding me?
Hillarycare is back and it's even worse this time around.
The Democrats will lose their majorities because of it once again, just as they did in 1994.
Hillary Clinton is the gift that keeps on giving... to Republicans.

 
20 posted on 09/18/2007 4:44:12 PM PDT by counterpunch (Ron Paul is gearing up to be Hillary Clinton's Ross Perot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson