[nicmarlo]

A shadow of a doubt....but a “reasonable person” would likely conclude that several armed thugs, in the presence of an accused (and believed to be by many) murderer, such as OJ, would exacerbate, if not CAUSE, any heart condition/trauma.

[Tolsti]

Can this guy now sue OJ for whatever else he may have?

[Tolsti]

Can this guy now sue OJ for whatever else he may have?

[frankjr]

“but a “reasonable person” would likely conclude that several armed thugs, in the presence of an accused (and believed to be by many) murderer, such as OJ, would exacerbate, if not CAUSE, any heart condition/trauma.”

Highly unlikely in any case, but no way in this case since Bruce Fromong was most likely involved in setting up OJ in this so-called armed robbery.

[steve86]

but a “reasonable person” would likely conclude that several armed thugs, in the presence of an accused (and believed to be by many) murderer, such as OJ, would exacerbate, if not CAUSE, any heart condition/trauma.

Well, I agree with that myself. But a tricky lawyer would get him off on that one and it could end up with a civil suit by the man's estate against O.J. again.

[Not just another dumb blonde]

I like to think of myself as a reasonable person. But I wouldn’t conclude that it was caused by the incident. If he’d had the heart attack during the commission of the crime I could think differently. I’m still scratching my head trying to figure out how someone can be aquitted of murder in a criminal trial, but found guilty in a wrongful death civil suit. Doesn’t this scare anyone else?