Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Penn Eng PC Memory Nano Form That Gets Data 1,000 Times Faster
Penn University ^ | September 17, 2007 | Jordan Reese

Posted on 09/18/2007 7:44:13 PM PDT by prophetic

PHILADELPHIA -- Scientists from the University of Pennsylvania have developed nanowires capable of storing computer data for 100,000 years and retrieving that data a thousand times faster than existing portable memory devices such as Flash memory and micro-drives, all using less power and space than current memory technologies.

Ritesh Agarwal, an assistant professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and colleagues developed a self-assembling nanowire of germanium antimony telluride, a phase-changing material that switches between amorphous and crystalline structures, the key to read/write computer memory. Fabrication of the nanoscale devices, roughly 100 atoms in diameter, was performed without conventional lithography, the blunt, top-down manufacturing process that employs strong chemicals and often produces unusable materials with space, size and efficiency limitations.

Instead, researchers used self-assembly, a process by which chemical reactants crystallize at lower temperatures mediated by nanoscale metal catalysts to spontaneously form nanowires that were 30-50 nanometers in diameter and 10 micrometers in length, and then they fabricated memory devices on silicon substrates. "We measured the resulting nanowires for write-current amplitude, switching speed between amorphous and crystalline phases, long-term durability and data retention time," Agarwal said.

Tests showed extremely low power consumption for data encoding (0.7mW per bit). They also indicated the data writing, erasing and retrieval (50 nanoseconds) to be 1,000 times faster than conventional Flash memory and indicated the device would not lose data even after approximately 100,000 years of use, all with the potential to realize terabit-level nonvolatile memory device density.

"This new form of memory has the potential to revolutionize the way we share information, transfer data and even download entertainment as consumers," Agarwal said. "This represents a potential sea-change in the way we access and store data." Phase-change memory in general features faster read/write, better durability and simpler construction compared with other memory technologies such as Flash. The challenge has been to reduce the size of phase change materials by conventional lithographic techniques without damaging their useful properties. Self-assembled phase-change nanowires, as created by Penn researchers, operate with less power and are easier to scale, providing a useful new strategy for ideal memory that provides efficient and durable control of memory several orders of magnitude greater than current technologies.

"The atomic scale of the nanodevices may represent the ultimate size limit in current-induced phase transition systems for non-volatile memory applications," Agarwal said.

Current solid-state technology for products like memory cards, digital cameras and personal data assistants traditionally utilize Flash memory, a non-volatile and durable computer memory that can be erased and reprogrammed electronically. Data on Flash drives provides most battery-powered devices with acceptable levels of durability and moderately fast data access. Yet the technology's limits are apparent. Digital cameras can't snap rapid-fire photos because it takes precious seconds to store the last photo to memory. If the memory device is fast, as in DRAM and SRAM used in computers, then it is volatile; if the plug on a desktop computer is pulled, all recent data entry is lost.

Therefore, a universal memory device is desired that can be scalable, fast, durable and nonvolatile, a difficult set of requirements which have now been demonstrated at Penn. "Imagine being able to store hundreds of high-resolution movies in a small drive, downloading them and playing them without wasting time on data buffering, or imagine booting your laptop computer in a few seconds as you wouldn't need to transfer the operating system to active memory" Agarwal said. The research was performed by Agarwal, Se-Ho Lee and Yeonwoong Jung of the Department of Materials Science and Engineering in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at Penn. The findings appear online in the journal Nature Nanotechnology and in the October print edition.

The research was supported by the Materials Research Science and Engineering Center at Penn, the University of Pennsylvania Research Foundation award and a grant from the National Science Foundation.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: computer; memory; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Wow, imagine a 1 Terabyte ultra-fast flash memory stick for $20 and a 2" laptop sized 10 Petabyte (1000 terabytes) Flash hard drive for $100!!

Bye Bye old spinning hard drives!

1 posted on 09/18/2007 7:44:28 PM PDT by prophetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: prophetic
You could install such devices in the long bones of your hands. Hook up a positional reference indicator glove and you could sit there typing to yourself, and a nice popup display in your lens, and you're good to go.

This passed right by the "butt plug" idea where there'd be an intermediate step in the size of the equipment so you'd use a hollowed out Coccyx to stash the equipment.

2 posted on 09/18/2007 7:55:46 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prophetic

Oh, yeah, almost forgot. Now that we’ve built one we know what to look for in our search for “Computer Chips Of The Ancients” ~ this stuff has gotta’ be laying all over the place ~ in little 100 atom units ~ Bwahahahahahahaha!


3 posted on 09/18/2007 7:58:57 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prophetic

I hope it is true.

It would be a major leap forward in electronic memory devices. Now only if they can mass produce them at low cost.


4 posted on 09/18/2007 8:05:22 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
We don't see the beings visiting us from the future because they are nanobots riding on insects.

Oh, and yes they did come to earth to eat us. It's just that they are so small it is taking them a long long time to get the job done.

I believe that flesh-eating disease may actually represent either an advancement in the aliens' method for consuming human flesh, or the rare occasion where a large number of them congregate in one place at one time for a big feast.

5 posted on 09/18/2007 8:07:31 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Neat article. Great technology. Freak show comments! Wow, you guys shift gears like nobody’s business.


6 posted on 09/18/2007 8:22:04 PM PDT by Big Giant Head (I should change my tagline to "Big Giant Distraction on my Head")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: prophetic

I pray this technology is manufactured here in America rather than just given to China.


7 posted on 09/18/2007 8:25:25 PM PDT by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Giant Head
You have nothing to fear from the nanobots.

Your head is big and giant and it will take them quite some time to consume enough of it to cause you to start voting Democrat.

8 posted on 09/18/2007 8:27:29 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; ..

9 posted on 09/18/2007 8:41:30 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Mo1; Ciexyz; ...

ping


10 posted on 09/18/2007 8:54:20 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Michael Moore bought Haliburton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Myrddin; Robert A. Cook, PE
Like, *PING*, dudes.

Cheers!

11 posted on 09/18/2007 8:56:39 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: prophetic

I’m sure something like this will eventually replace hard disk drives. It appears that this innovation certainly could do just that. Very exciting times!


12 posted on 09/18/2007 9:01:42 PM PDT by KoRn (Just Say NO ....To Liberal Republicans - FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prophetic

0.7mW to write a bit? That’s 700 Megawatts to store 1 terabit. The 30 amp service to my house might have some troubles delivering that much power.


13 posted on 09/18/2007 9:02:02 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Thanks for the ping, looks interesting. BMFLR.


14 posted on 09/18/2007 9:03:29 PM PDT by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: prophetic
Coming Soon...
15 posted on 09/18/2007 9:10:02 PM PDT by Lancer_N3502A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prophetic
The title of this thread confuses me so I think I will just go to bed and forget I ever saw it.

Nighty night,
Homey

16 posted on 09/18/2007 9:12:27 PM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Now can we send a ship to another star system and back?... Are we there yet?


17 posted on 09/18/2007 9:19:36 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support. Defend life support for others in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

That’s only 700Megawatts if you store all trillion bits in parallel, and even then it would only take 700MW for 50 nanoseconds.

You would use this technology to write to data a 32, 64, 128, or even more bits at a time. 128 bits at a time would by 86mW max power draw.


18 posted on 09/18/2007 9:22:41 PM PDT by krb (If you're not outraged, people probably like having you around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Thanks for the ping. I like the longer persistence, lower power and faster access. I wonder about the ability to withstand broad temperature ranges and high vibration. Both of those environmental characteristics have forced design changes to my embedded systems on freight railcars. Tiny surface mount components on multi-layer boards with conformal coating has helped immensely by reducing mass in a high G environment. Using DSP techniques has overcome issues with temperature instability in analog filter components. The Apacer FLASH memory is doing a decent job at this point in time.
19 posted on 09/18/2007 9:26:53 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: krb

You think 700 MW over 50 ns might melt the sucker?


20 posted on 09/18/2007 9:37:02 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson