Skip to comments.Decision expected today in íRKO play to keep Carr
Posted on 09/19/2007 7:37:13 AM PDT by raccoonradio
WRKO radio host Howie Carrs future on the airwaves will be determined today by a Suffolk Superior Court judge who will decide whether the popular talk host can jump to rival WTKK without any future legal woes.
At the center of the legal battle are the right-to-match and non-compete provisions in Carrs contract with WRKO (680 AM), which Carrs lawyer says are illegal and unenforceable under Massachusetts law.
At a court hearing yesterday, Carrs attorney, Bret Cohen, argued that a state statute prohibits the enforceability of noncompete agreements and other post-employment restrictions against people in the broadcast industry.
But Shepard Davidson, an attorney for WRKO, said the statute doesnt apply to this case and the right-to-match provision in Carrs contract is enforceable. The provision purports to give WRKO the right to meeting a competing salary offer within 180 days from any radio or TV station within WRKOs coverage area.
In July, the Greater Media-owned WTKK (96.9 FM) offered Carr a five-year deal worth $7 million to host the morning drive slot left open by Don Imus. WRKO, owned by Entercom Communications, matched the offer the next day.
Carrs contract with WRKO expires today. Barring a court order, he plans to debut at 5:30 a.m. tomorrow on WTKK. Judge Allan van Gestel, who presides over the courts Business Litigation Session, will issue the written decision. Carr declined comment.
Howie Carr ping. Today may well be Howie’s last show on
WRKO and his “network” but the question is, will tomorrow be his first day on WTKK...or not? Down to the wire it goes.
The following is by Brian Maloney from SaveWRKO.com:
Will a Suffolk County judge grant his employer’s request for at least a temporary court order barring him from switching to the competition tomorrow morning?
The Boston Herald has the details here (see above)
While I would never claim to be a legal expert, common sense does come into play here. From the judge’s standpoint, he might ask why Carr is in such a big hurry to jump ship before these issues can be resolved.
Once Carr actually does a show from his new digs on Morrissey Boulevard, it’s going to be difficult for Entercom to remove him. That’s why winning this round is crucial.
Though Entercom might ultimately lose this case, I think Howie greatly underestimated the company’s resolve. That would have required researching the company’s history in similar matters beyond Boston.
Guess what: they play hardball.
In fact, even if Entercom believes it will lose, David Field & Friends will keep it going just to wipe out Howie’s bank account. My guess is that Greater Media is not footing Carr’s legal bills, contrary to popular perception.
Feel free to taser me if I’m wrong, but I see Howie taking an unplanned holiday from the airwaves.
VanGestel was with Goodwin, Procter in Boston before he became a state judge about 10 years ago. I think his preferred specialization was anti-trust, but I don't know where he stood. He is definitely anti-death penalty and was writing a book putting forth his views (but I don't know if he finished or got it published).
He was also the judge who issued that gag order in the sex education case a few years back. I don't recall the details, but a guy who is active against the rabid sex education current in the schools attended a parents' meeting and taped it. VanGestel put a gag order on him not to disseminate the tape. Maybe someone remembers more.
I don't recall if Howie wrote a column on this, but if he did, he probably skewered the judge but good. Not that that would influence the judge in any way, of course! ;-)
I (raccoonradio) wrote:
Too bad Howie didn't get Judge E. George Daher (the man who dubbed Billy Bulger "a corrupt midget"). Might be a bit sympathetic.
>>Funny, that the 'quote Liberal' judges that carr rants against may actually rule to fatten his pockets.
Please, let it be so, or let what happened to Imus happen to Howie: A $20 million settlement :)
It will be interesting to see if Howie is indeed on--first of all, might he be stuck at the courthouse (unless proceedings end before 3) or would WRKO indeed bench him? If Howie does make the jump what happens to the ads he's voiced for the station?
Can Howie get the howiecarr.com domain name back? he may have to get his own variation like howiecarrshow or friedclamman.com
This from Casablanca, a former WRKO producer who is not fond of Howie:
Unless we want to go back to indentured servitude I think the courts must rule in Howie Carr's favor. Like him or not, Carr has a right to work and make a living wherever he wants. His contract with Entercom ended; if there was an option, as reported, they did not pick it up. Howie should go to WTKK if that is where he wants to be.
It would set a terrible precedent if Entercom were to win and to be able to restrict talent [ although I use the word "talent" with caution]. If the courts support Entercom today the "talent" you like tomorrow may suffer.
Entercom seems to have made all the mistakes...that is a real surprise. Now, they should live with their actions or inactions. This time Howie Carr is in the right and the courts must support him
and I responded:
A caller noted yesterday that Howie should say something outrageous so he can eventually get a huge settlement like Imus did!
Even if Howie's off air for awhile he can still stay afloat via Herald and "book money"
>>Like him or not, Carr has a right to work and make a living wherever he wants.
That's very true--he would be forced to work where he doesn't want though I think that has happened in the past to baseball players (traded, or see the Curt Flood case)
btw I haven't read Globe article yet but Gary at boston-radio-interest reported that the station that wants to keep him is "WRKO-FM". ARKO-matic Howie! Be sure to tune in to 96.9 AM (LOL) tomorrow in case Howie wins his case! Not surprising, as this is the paper which used to tell people the Red Sox game would be on "WEEI-FM 850" (sic)
The complaint Howie's lawyers had filed, btw, can be seen here
contract due to expire today
Howie signed a couple extensions to the "six month date" back in March but then they failed to renew and once they heard of the WTKK offer they said they matched it and had the right to do so. Howie's lawyers say provisions are unenforceable.
Superior Court Judge Allan van Gestel didn't take kindly to a request by two major media outlets that are warring with each other to keep documents related to their legal battle from being made public.
So he didn't seal the court filings, but that's not unusual. I can't find anything by Howie mentioning van Gestel, which seems odd. Or anything old in the Herald mentioning him, and I know he's been mentioned. Maybe if I could remember the name of the guy who did the taping at that meeting . . .
yup—his name doesn’t ring a bell with me though
Ruling leaves Howie Carr in limbo
Jessica Heslam By Jessica Heslam
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
A Suffolk Superior Court judge ruled today that WRKO radio was entitled to exercise the right to match provision in Howie Carrs contract, which allows the station to meet a competitors offer and leaves the popular talk show host in limbo.
Its unclear whether Carr will take over the morning drive show on Greater Medias WTKK (96.9 FM) tomorrow.
Said WRKO (680 AM) spokesman George Regan: We hope Howie will continue his show on WRKO radio.
The right to match clause in Carrs contract with WRKO, which is owned by Entercom Communications, gives the station the right to meet a competing salary offer within 180 days from any radio or TV station within WRKOs coverage area.
The judge said Carr could have quietly met with Greater Media to discuss or negotiate his future while his WRKO agreement was still operative.
What Carr could not do is what he did here: receive and accept an offer from Greater Boston Radio Inc. before his Artists Agreement had terminated, the judge wrote.
Shepard Davidson, an attorney for WRKO, declined comment today. Carr attorney Bret Cohen could not be reached.
Carrs attorneys argued that the right to match and non-compete provisions were illegal and unenforceable under state law and pointed to a statute that prohibits the enforceability of post-employment restrictions against people who work in the broadcast industry.
But the statute says a broadcast employee can go to work for a competitor after they have been terminated by their employer, terminated by mutual agreement or their contract expired. Carrs contract with WRKO expired today and he made a deal to jump to WTKK in July.
The Artists Agreement still has not been terminated by Entercom, or by mutual agreement of Entercom and Carr, or by the expiration of the Agreement itself, Judge Allan van Gestel wrote in todays 18-page ruling.
The judge wrote that Entercom Communications was allowed to exercise its right to match WTKKs offer while Carrs agreement with WRKO was still fully operative for two more months.
That exercise continued the Artists Agreement in effect well beyond September 19, the judge wrote. And it is not a post-employment restriction.
For Carr to receive protection, under the state statute, the judge wrote, in the circumstances presented here would require this Court to ignore the fact that his Artists Agreement has not terminated.
However, the judge said the non-compete clause in Carrs agreement is unenforceable under state law after Carrs contract with WRKO ends.
The judge said he wasnt ruling on whether Carr is compelled to stay working at WRKO.
Carr and WRKO have been embroiled in a legal battle since July when WTKK offered him a five-year contract worth about $7 million to host the slot left vacant by fired shock jock Don Imus. WRKO matched the rival stations offer the following day.
Carr filed a lawsuit against WRKO in July claiming his contract with the station contained illegal provisions that prohibit him from working at competing stations. The suit also claimed the station failed to extend his contract several times.
WRKO then filed a countersuit to block him from jumping ship, claiming Carr and his agent, Cary Pahigian, conspired to break his contract by negotiating with WTKK. Carr was set to debut tomorrow morning on WTKK.
Turn to The Messenger blog (in the Herald) for updates.
A Suffolk Superior Court ruling today leaves Herald columnist and radio personality Howie Carrs future on the airwaves in Boston in limbo
BY BRIAN MALONEY
As I had expected, Howies legal case didnt go quite as well as his entourage hoped. That means I wont have to be tasered after all, thank goodness.
Heres Jessica Heslams courtroom coverage (see above)
In the story, Heslam says the ruling leaves Howies show in limbo, but I think its reasonably clear we wont be hearing him debut on WTKK tomorrow.
Keep this in mind: while Entercom may not be terribly bright when it comes to programming radio stations, the firms legal department is another story. They will present a stronger defense than most observers anticipated and have already begun to do so.
UPDATE- the Globies reach pretty much the same conclusion as the Herald:
The judge wrote today that in the final judgment, which is yet to come, the part of the contract which included a non-compete clause is not enforceable under state law, but another clause that gave WRKO the right to match any new offer was enforceable.
Carrs contract would have expired today, but Entercom Communications Corp. of Pennsylvania, which owns WRKO, alleges that it matched the offer from a rival station and therefore Carr is bound to his contract until Sept. 30, 2012.
The court is aware that Carr claims that he cannot be forced to work for WRKO, Superior Court Judge Allan van Gestel wrote in his decision. While Carrs position may have merit, it is not presently before this Court on the three motions in play. In short, it remains for another day, on another record.
Carrs spokeswoman and attorney did not immediately comment. George Regan, a spokesman for Entercom and WRKO, said today, We hope Howie comes back to work soon.
Posted by Brian Maloney at 02:02 PM |
we can continue this on today’s Howie live ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.