Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clintonfatigued

If you only look at San Franfreeco and Lost Angeles, they are correct. Those two cities, because of their population numbers control the state. If you took out those two cities, California would be overwhelmingly Republican.


13 posted on 09/20/2007 7:34:03 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RC2
If you took out those two cities, California would be overwhelmingly Republican.

I'm afraid you overstate the redness of the golden state. I live on the coast south of SF. There is a slightly red tinge around Monterey because of all the retired and active military. Other than that the coast is rat heaven from Big Sur to the Oregon border. Look at the makeup of the congressional reps in the greater bay area. On second thought, don't. It would make you sick.

Maybe if you took out L.A. and S.F. the state would be slightly republican, but to be sure you would also have to remove some or all of the following: Oakland, Berkeley, Sacramento, San Jose.

24 posted on 09/20/2007 8:43:44 PM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RC2

The two cities and their largely immigrant, displaced east coast populace.


40 posted on 09/21/2007 9:18:26 AM PDT by Smogger (It's the WOT Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson