Posted on 09/20/2007 7:33:48 PM PDT by cgk
FBI suppressed video of TWA explosion
 Recovered debris from TWA 800 |
|
More than six years after retired United Airline captain Ray Lahr launched his Freedom of Information Act petition into the fate of TWA Flight 800, the FBI has shown him –likely by accident – one seriously smoking gun.
The Boeing 747 blew up off the coast of Long Island on July 17, 1996. One of the FBI documents received recently by Lahr and his attorney details a communication that took place six days after the crash:
"The FBI guy who looked at this must not have read it, or not have realized what it would reveal, Otherwise he would have redacted most of it as before."
(excerpt...)
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Not really, the parts would be of different size, shape & color from the aircraft. Plus not all of the rocket parts would be severly fragmented. There would be some parts left in pretty good shape to id them “if found”.
I have been trying to remember the name of the Ron Brown associate who died in that crash...for years.
Was this the man who was scheduled for, but missed, the flight that Ron Brown died in?
I know, crazy, but I really heard that reported (someone missed the flight at the last minute) I heard it at the time...then never again.
Bingo...that is what I was referring to!
“This conspiracy stuff is embarrasing.”
Sometimes it sure is, for those not wanting the spotlight put on something.
Let’s say you and I got together and fr-mailed eachother and came up with a plan to show up on threads such as these and immediately throw out the word conspiracy and offer nothing else substantive. You and I would no doubt have conspired together to execute a plan. You are now part of a conspiracy to show up on threads such as these and immediately throw out the word conpiracy.
Would that not be both true and totally accurate, while still being a conspiracy? Yes it would be.
Stalking me????? You are disturbed.
Demanding to know my military background, for what, to compare it to yours, and throwing around acronyms that most people don’t know, for what, to compare with my acronyms, sounds like begging for a pissing contest. By the way, why don’t you put all of this good stuff about your military background in your profile?
just defending the military from those who would attack it and try and discredit it and bring it down.
You can’t really believe that I am trying to bring down the military?
I cannot understand how someone can believe the military is stupid enough to shoot down a U.S. civilian airliner,
No one is accusing the military of stupidity. No one is accusing the military of targeting TWA 800. Sanders is saying that the military was targeting a terrorist-operated airplane that was threatening TWA 800. Mistakes and collateral damage are a fact of life, even when you think you have a clean shot. What about the Iranian airbus that the US Navy shot down during the Gulf War.
Also, under the right circumstances, the US military would target a US civilian airliner as they certainly would have done on 9/11.
evil enough to cover it up,
No one is saying the military is evil. Sanders, and those who believe his theory, accuse the Clinton administration of the cover up, not the military.
if you believe they shot down and covered up TWA 800 then I assume you believe that they're out there murdering civilians and committing atrocities in Iraq.
You are over the top. How does anything I have said in this thread lead you to infer that I believe the military is committing murder and atrocities in Iraq? Now, that is a non-sequitur.
No, I did to show that I'm speaking from experience and not just stating uninformed opinion or parroting conspiracy theories. If you consider that engaging in a pissing contest then so be it.
You can’t really believe that I am trying to bring down the military?
You are saying that you believe the U.S. military is incompetent enough to shoot down a civilian airliner and devious enough to deny it and cover it up. That they are, in fact, cold-blooded murderers. What would you call that?
No one is accusing the military of stupidity. No one is accusing the military of targeting TWA 800. Sanders is saying that the military was targeting a terrorist-operated airplane that was threatening TWA 800. Mistakes and collateral damage are a fact of life, even when you think you have a clean shot.
Shooting two missiles at a small airplane in the middle of the busiest air corridor in the world is stupidity. The whole scenario is insane. And one would have to believe the military brass was insane if you honestly believe they would do that.
What about the Iranian airbus that the US Navy shot down during the Gulf War.
The Navy didn't deny that or try and cover it up. You're claiming that they did with a U.S. airliner and U.S. civilians.
Also, under the right circumstances, the US military would target a US civilian airliner as they certainly would have done on 9/11.
With an Air Force jet at close range. Not with a navy ship hundreds of miles away.
No one is saying the military is evil. Sanders, and those who believe his theory, accuse the Clinton administration of the cover up, not the military.
Oh give me a break! Clinton covered it up but not the military???? How could Clinton pull something like that off without the help of the military? You are making less and less sense as you go along.
You are over the top. How does anything I have said in this thread lead you to infer that I believe the military is committing murder and atrocities in Iraq? Now, that is a non-sequitur.
You say that you believe that they U.S. military is capable of killing U.S. civilians and covering it up, but then suggest that they would never, ever do the same in Iraq? Please!
OK, what do you think happened to TWA 800?
forgot what I was gonna say...
forgot what I was gonna say...
Your tagline says/reads it all! I agree with it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.