[Perdogg]

The eyewitness views were included in the final report. However, even though it was expected that there were inconsistencies in the eyewitness reports, none of the eyewitness provided anything that was consistant with a MANPAD attack.

[ml/nj]

none of the eyewitness provided anything that was consistant with a MANPAD attack.

This is certainly a Clintonesque reply.

I have never suggested that the missile which downed TWA 800 was a MANPAD. In fact, I believe I have refuted this idea.

You said you wanted evidence that a missile downed TWA 800. Not all missiles are MANPADS.

And while the eyewitness accounts might not be consistent with a MANPAD attack, they are certainly not consistent the idea that no missile at all was involved.

ML/NJ