Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...
Dan-in-denial ping to Today show list.
2 posted on
09/21/2007 6:42:19 AM PDT by
governsleastgovernsbest
(Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
3 posted on
09/21/2007 6:44:23 AM PDT by
BigDaddyTX
(Don't Mex with Texas)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
4 posted on
09/21/2007 6:44:43 AM PDT by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
If he is so stupid that he has yet to be convinced these documents are fake then we need to examine EVERYOTHER STORY this dumbass has ever reported.
5 posted on
09/21/2007 6:44:45 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Oh good grief, Rather. Give it up. Move on.
LET. IT. GO. Really.
6 posted on
09/21/2007 6:46:16 AM PDT by
Shelayne
(NO running or relenting until the problem has been dealt with-decisively,systematically,permanently.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
The gift that keeps on giving. The OJ of the MSM.
7 posted on
09/21/2007 6:46:25 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
((Not a newbie, just wanted a new screen name))
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Nobody proved the documents were real. They are, therefore, fake. The difference is subtle but huge.
Why a journalists would think any different baffles me.
Bull$$1t is not “Presumed fact until it is refuted.” Rather it is the other way around. “It is pure BS until it is proven.”
I guess he is “Rather” confused.
8 posted on
09/21/2007 6:46:38 AM PDT by
Tenacious 1
(No to nitwit jesters with a predisposition of self importance and unqualified political opinions!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest; Buckhead
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Hey Dan, I believe you were the one who needed to provide proof that they were authentic. Plenty of bloggers were able to figure out that they were fakes.
What an ignorant fool. I guess that is why he is liberal. His thought process is flawed.
10 posted on
09/21/2007 6:47:31 AM PDT by
w1andsodidwe
(Jimmy Carter allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
12 posted on
09/21/2007 6:48:22 AM PDT by
Alouette
(Vicious Babushka)
To: Buckhead
13 posted on
09/21/2007 6:48:22 AM PDT by
Disambiguator
(What's the temperature, Albert?)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
..ex-CBS producer Mary Mapes continues to cling to the delusion that the Memogate documents were authentic. In an inteview on "Morning Joe," Dan Rather has now made a similar reality-denying claim. 
"Dan, my man, I love you baby but you gotta cut back on the El Momo Dude. Hey I'm starvin'. Want to go to Mackie D's and get a couple of Quarterpounders?"
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Better yet Dan, you cannot prove it is NOT a fake!
16 posted on
09/21/2007 6:52:59 AM PDT by
TommyDale
(Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
MSM continues to react to Rather/Mapes assertion.."nobody can prove they were fakes ..blah,blah,blah."
Nobody is asking the question to Rather/Mapes about not being able to verify the authenticity of the documents.
18 posted on
09/21/2007 6:54:08 AM PDT by
stylin19a
(Go Bears !)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Further evidence that liberals are out of touch with reality.
19 posted on
09/21/2007 6:54:21 AM PDT by
popdonnelly
(No more no win wars.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Well the great thing is that Putzhead will now make CBS prove in court that the documents were fraudulent.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
21 posted on
09/21/2007 6:54:31 AM PDT by
marvlus
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I hope Rather’s suit is as successful as Alger Hiss’ civil suit against Whittaker Chambers.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Hey Dan...no one ever proved they were genuine, which of course should’ve been your first priority being a journalist.
Christ, what a twit. Prove the negative?
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Danny, Danny, Danny,
The onus is on you. You haven't proved that the documents are authentic, other than your claim that they are. It was your news story; you provide the proof.
26 posted on
09/21/2007 6:55:54 AM PDT by
Tanniker Smith
(I didn't know she was a Liberal when I married her.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
