Posted on 09/22/2007 1:27:25 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
bttt
One of your best JH2. Thanks.
Thank you so much for this excellent wrap-up!
The Clintons are truly TEFLON....at least here on earth.
Great cartoons, gramps.
“....and required them to donate to Democratic candidates.”
&&&&&&
Isn’t it lucky for the GOP that Hsu was devoted to Dem candidates, instead of an equal opportunity ‘donor.’
Hsu probably did not want visibility to any Republicans who would be opposing Hillary. She was his 'get out of jail free' card. There was a large political party where Hsu grabbed the microphone and stated, 'if you are not for Hillary Clinton, get out'. He was doubling down and going for broke with the Hildabeast.
A most EXCELLENT summation, JH2!
Every time I read about Hsu, one word comes to mind...
...jellooooo. ;o)
Ohhhh...bump that!
Nice bundling (of ‘toons), Gramps!
Thanks.
Maybe H$U should have bundled toons and stayed away from raising money for the rats via fraud and bungled bundling.
$ue H$U!
That would have been my advice. ;o)
'Why Didn't They Go Get Him?'( referring to authorities in California )
************************EXCERPT****************************
He may be a good lawyer, but Brosnahan may be an even better investigator. He asked the $63 million question yesterday, and even provided the $63 million answer:
"Mr. Hsu was not acting as a fugitive," Brosnahan said. Hsu appeared at prominent fundraisers on both coasts for high-profile candidates such as Clinton."Why didn't they go get him?" Brosnahan said outside court. "He was contributing to California politicians."
Gee, I wonder why California didn't seem all that interested in arresting Norman Hsu? It couldn't be because he generated tens of thousands of dollars in contributions to Californians like Attorney General Jerry Brown ($5500), Senator Dianne Feinstein ($22,162), Senator Barbara Boxer ($5,000), Congresswoman Doris Matsui ($16,850), and Assemblywoman Fiona Ma ($27,600), could it? What possible motive would they have in keeping Hsu free? (via Suitably Flip)
With those friends, it doesn't seem all that difficult to understand why California never bothered to chase down their fugitive.
Gee, I wonder why California didn’t seem all that interested in arresting Norman Hsu? It couldn’t be because he generated tens of thousands of dollars in contributions to Californians like Attorney General Jerry Brown ($5500), Senator Dianne Feinstein ($22,162), Senator Barbara Boxer ($5,000), Congresswoman Doris Matsui ($16,850), and Assemblywoman Fiona Ma ($27,600), could it? What possible motive would they have in keeping Hsu free?
—
That’s politics today.. and then as well.
Nothing to see here, best to just MoveOn along. ;-)
“Gee, I wonder why California didn’t seem all that interested in arresting Norman Hsu? It couldn’t be because he generated tens of thousands of dollars in contributions to Californians like Attorney General Jerry Brown ($5500), Senator Dianne Feinstein ($22,162), Senator Barbara Boxer ($5,000), Congresswoman Doris Matsui ($16,850), and Assemblywoman Fiona Ma ($27,600), could it? What possible motive would they have in keeping Hsu free? (via Suitably Flip)
With those friends, it doesn’t seem all that difficult to understand why California never bothered to chase down their fugitive.”
Do you know if Moonbeam recommended Hsu after he was AG to the guy, who is now suing Hsu because of Moonbeam’s and other rats who recommended him.
A good judge of character, Brosnahan ain't.
BTK did not look like a fugitive serial killer. Neither did Ted Bundy, or John Gacy (who was pictured with Roslyn Carter).
So using Brosnahan's criteria, L/E should just leave these guys alone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.