Posted on 09/22/2007 4:32:17 PM PDT by Uncledave
SAN FRANCISCO, Sep. 21, 2007 (KGO) - An East Bay company is hoping to harness wind power in a way that could change cargo shipping forever. It's a new twist on a very old technology.
The first sailing ship came into San Francisco Bay through the Golden Gate in 1775. There's nothing new about wind power. But there is something very new about the big plans to harness much more of that power. A huge kite was on the Bay last weekend helping pull a 140 ton workboat from the Golden Gate Bridge to Alameda. KiteShip Corporation of Alameda put on the combination demonstration and experiment to promote this form of wind power. Company executives say it can reduce cargo ship fuel consumption by 10-25 percent -- which would be huge savings.
"Ships burn $1 million, $2 million, even $5 million dollars of fuel per year," said Dave Culp, KiteShip Corporation.
And it would clean up the air filling those kites.
"Every gallon of fuel not burned is three gallons of worth of CO2 that doesn't go into the atmosphere, its huge amounts of sulfur dioxide that doesn't go into the atmosphere, huge amounts of nitrous dioxide that doesn't go into the atmosphere," said Dave Culp.
KiteShip's Dean Jordan assessed the partially windpowered cruise -- not all went so smoothly.
"We didn't get a practice and we had to fabricate all the equipment we used on the vessel to steer the kite," said Dean Jordan, KiteShip Corporation.
There was trouble with one of the three wenches.
"The line would come on the wench and then lock up," said Dean Jordan.
Still the experiment was educational. Jordan and Culp worked together in the 90's on a kite for the Oracle/BMW team in the America's Cup Yacht Race. He says had those on board the yacht deployed their kite, which was an approved spinnaker replacement sail -- the USA would have defeated New Zealand and this type of wind power would be famous by now.
"Can you imagine Oracle wins America's Cup by flying a kite - It would have made headlines around the world!" said Dean Jordan.
KiteShip hopes its next video will allow it to make headlines by engineering a 13,000 square foot kite to co-power vessels up to 600 feet in length saving $300,000 dollars in fuel per year, per vessel.
It seems it's not a matter of if but when for this technology -- companies in Europe and Asia are all working on this technology. The folks at KiteShip say the future is near. That those huge kites will be helping to haul huge cargo ships in three to five years.
Copyright 2007, ABC7/KGO-TV/DT.
Please Freep Mail me if you'd like on/off
Huh? Someone invented a sailboat?
Thanks for posting this — it’s very interesting technology.
Here’s a thread on the subject that I started two years ago:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1487522/posts
A ship is just no place for women.
I think AlGore invented that before he invented the internet!
Beat me to it! LOL!
30% savings in fuel costs, I think you’ll have the shipping companies interested. 5%? I think they’ll be laughing at you. And if it requires more crew to handle, they’ll also be laughing at the concept.
I've never locked up, coming onto a wench.
LOL....Technological breakthrough, eh?
I'm sure it will get a few million taxdollars for "further research"....
Interesting idea but all I see is a kite flying from a tow boat. Where is the proof the kite is actually providing enough propulsion power to back up their fuel reduction claims?
They could monitor the electrical power in the "wenches" and calculate the tension on the cable.
"The line would come on the wench and then lock up,"I've never locked up, coming onto a wench
It's the wench tightening up on you you need worry about! ;^0
I fell for it and clicked the link. In the first paragraph was this little gem.
Seems funny to me seeing sufficiently heinous government environmental regulation advertised as justification for a business....I know it's been that way all along, but it's like ... what, protection? "These guys with their guns to our heads mean it's more advantageous to walk down this street..."
I'm sure I'm not getting my idea across...
And now it's 2007. Is this progress?
There have also been some experiments with steam that look very promising.
Then why hasn't it been commercial?
After almost 30 years of trying?
I have!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.