[ejonesie22]

Yes, but in sales, it is first impressions. I have seen the FAQ and like I said over a week ago I am chewing the details from multiple resources. But bold initial claims and planting everyone that has an issue with the FairTax as an SQL or IRS lover is not helping, it reduces credibility.

[groanup]

planting everyone that has an issue with the FairTax as an SQL or IRS lover is not helping, it reduces credibility.

I'm sorry I don't recall seeing you on these FT threads over the years. I'm not sure how designating the opposition reduces credibility. One thing is sure, whenever the anti's are asked why they believe sticking with the income tax would be better for America than switching to the FT, for the most part, they clam up or twist the question around in a mega spin.

[lucysmom]

But bold initial claims and planting everyone that has an issue with the FairTax as an SQL or IRS lover is not helping, it reduces credibility.

Its in their script.

To say everyone gets 100% of their paycheck IS misleading because exactly what 100% means is not defined, nor does the bill define how it breaks out. Further, the claim that prices will fall because hidden taxes are removed without defining what those taxes are is also misleading.