[LdSentinal]

Ron Turd seems to be unaware that there were 50,000 people in the Twin Towers on 9/11.

9/11 was an attempt to kill 50,000+ people.

[Rocko]

Another reason not to vote for Ron Paul. As if we need another.

[Tamar1973]

9/11 was an attempt to kill 50,000+ people.

The fact that only about 3000 died was a miracle itself. We can't depend on miracles to save us.

[Allegra]

[HuntsvilleTxVeteran]

Paulbarers, come on and agree that the people murdered on 9/11 should not be counted.

[lormand]

[SampleMan]

Indeed, more kids die in pools that are raped and killed by pedophiles, so why get so upset about it.

Even in 1941, there were likely more vehicular deaths than those killed at Pearl Harbor.

What a loser.

[I see my hands]

To: Ron "Fecal" Paul

So do natural causes, you repulsive moron.

[NautiNurse]

Highways don't kill people (except for an occasional bridge collapse). SUVs kill people.

[RichInOC]

I’m sorry. I didn’t realize there was a concerted effort by terrorists to kill people on the highways. There’s a lot of lethal stupidity, to be sure, but that’s not the same thing.

[inkling]

The Paulistinians are at it again. Gads, this guy’s a jack***.

[vbmoneyspender]

Comparing car accidents to mass-murdering terrorists is particularly inapt. We can be extremely confident that deaths from car accidents will occur at roughly the same rate from year to year because they are accidents. However, with regard to terrorists, we have no such assurance. In fact, history is with replete with examples where mass-murderers who were initially ignored then went on to kill even greater numbers. This isn’t rocket-science and the fact that Ron Paul doesn’t get it calls into question is basic sanity.

[Always Right]

Ron has lost every bit of credibility he had left. Now he is a terrorist apologist. How disgusting.

[Zman516]

Keep digging, Ron.

[Berlin_Freeper]

Is the highway trying to kill me with the worst weapons known to mankind?

Duh.

[PLMerite]

“...compared to the number who lost their lives on Sept. 11, 2001.”

It’s not about those who *have* died. It’s about those Americans who *will* die if radical islam isn’t brought under control.

[Tears of a Clown]

Ron Paul doesn’t take terrorism seriously at all.

He probably doesn’t even believe terrorists attacked us on 9/11...

I bet Al-Qaeda’s minions are praying to allah everyday that someone like ron paul will be elected, so that we will take the heat off of them and allow them to kill and maim with no threat of us intervening.

[keat]

Twenty posts and not a peep from the Paulestinian Liberation Organization on FR.

[river rat]

Now we have Ron Paul — comparing the 9/11 attack against the United States to accidents that occur on our highways!

Hell, I’m disappointed he didn’t use the the fact that MORE U.S. deaths/murders are caused by ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS in ONE YEAR than have been killed in FIVE YEARS in the war against Islamists.

He could have made a better case to bring the troops home to defend the borders against this invasion of thieves, murderers, drugs lords and destroyers of our national education and health systems.

Can folks still not see that Ron Paul in a VERY flawed individual who is totally unsuitable for any position of public trust or responsible for national security...

[jrooney]

Heh punk arse Ron Paul, we lose 3500 citizens every month in traffic accidents on our roads, well we have only lost little over 4000 troops in 6 years fighting terrorists in two wars. These are volunteers for military that are armed trained professionals fighting those that attacked us on 9/11, not citizens in vehicles that most control their own fates. Ron Paul you are a disgrace!

[EGPWS]

“A lot fewer lives died on 9/11 than they do in less than a month on our highways, but once again, who owns the highways? Do we own the highways? No. It’s a government institution you know. …We need to put all this in perspective.”

And putting things in perspective is why Ron Paul hasn't a gnat's of a chance to pop a vein while working out of the Oval Office.