Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Going Protectionist Over a Fantasy Highway [Reason libertarians on TranTexas Corridor]
Reason Magazine ("libertarians") ^ | September 24, 2007 | Shikha Dalmia and Leonard Gilroy/Reason Foundation

Posted on 09/24/2007 7:30:30 AM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com

...[The building of the Trans-Texas Corridor] is all too sinister for Jerome Corsi, the Vietnam War veteran who helped lead the Swift Boat charge against John Kerry. Corsi has knitted disparate strands of each of these separate road projects to help convince fellow xenophobes such as Pat Buchanan, Phyllis Schlafly, Lou Dobbs and the John Birch Society that the corridor is the first leg of a secret federal project called the NAFTA Superhighway, a four-football-field wide monstrosity that would run from Mexico's Yucatan to Canada's Yukon...

Yet even Texas Rep. Ron Paul, a libertarian Republican candidate for president, has fallen for the paranoia. You'd think that Paul would be chanting hosannas to anything that facilitates free trade, but he too fears that the "superhighway" is part of a scheme by foreign companies to erode U.S. borders and create a North American Union combining the United States, Mexico and Canada -- complete with a single government and a common currency called the "amero."

Superhighway opponents regard even routine dialogue between the three neighbors as a treasonous assault on U.S. sovereignty. They are apoplectic about the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), a forum created in 2005 for bureaucrats to discuss such radical topics as how to snag terrorists before they enter the continent and how to speed up cross-border traffic for just-in-time deliveries...

(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aliens; asia; bureaucrats; canada; cda; cintra; cintrazachry; cuespookymusic; dubaiports; duncanhunter; foreigners; foreigninvestment; freetrade; furriners; i69; ih69; immigrantlist; immigration; interstate69; jeromecorsi; johnbirchsociety; loudobbs; mexico; nafta; naftaonsteroids; naftasuperhighway; nationalsovereignty; opposition; p3; panamacanal; patbuchanan; paulestinian; phyllisschlafly; ppp; privatefunding; privateinvestment; privatesector; privatization; protectionism; ronpaul; sh130; spp; texas; texas130; tinfoil; trade; transtexascorridor; ttc; ttc35; ttc69; tx; unitedstates; us; usa; virgilgoode; xenophobia; zachry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
This article was already discussed here when it appeared in the Los Angeles Times. The authors aren't with that paper but are analysts with the Reason Foundation, a "libertarian" think tank that usually ends up supporting corporatism. Their editor believes in - literally - open borders.

Please help them see the errors of their ways by going here and leaving a comment pointing out one or two of the ways they're wrong.

1 posted on 09/24/2007 7:30:32 AM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

Suffice to say, both extremes are equally nuts.


2 posted on 09/24/2007 7:34:45 AM PDT by counterpunch (Mitt and Kerry wish you a great Pride Weekend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
I’m against the TTC for simple reasons. It displaces to many people and it runs right through good farm land. Put it in west Texas where there is miles and miles of nothing.
3 posted on 09/24/2007 8:05:36 AM PDT by 12th_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

invoke corsi and the turtle bay blue boys will come to tinkle. always good for a laugh.


4 posted on 09/24/2007 8:06:16 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
“Suffice to say, both extremes are equally nuts.”

Couldn’t have said it better myself, and I am libertarian. This is all much ado about nothing.

5 posted on 09/24/2007 8:13:54 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

Shouldn’t writers for Reason Magazine use rational arguments, rather than ad hominem insults?

As Aristotle might say, “Some people have posited that the trans-Texas highway is a threat to our freedom. Some have argued that it’s merely another superhighway. What are the arguments, for and against? How is this highway like other highways, and how is it different? Ladies and gentlemen, make your cases.”


6 posted on 09/24/2007 8:18:24 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Aristotle was no fool.


7 posted on 09/24/2007 8:26:20 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

Whose payroll are you on?


8 posted on 09/24/2007 8:30:22 AM PDT by RoadTest (Osama bin Laden could deliver the keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

My understanding is: Texans aren’t doing the TTC, it is being done to them.

They speak up and it doesn’t matter.

Toll roads for Cintra to make money on US citizens’ backs.


9 posted on 09/24/2007 8:40:55 AM PDT by kactus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

“Never mind that I-69 originated in a 1991 federal transportation law — pre-dating NAFTA — and that the planning for the Trans-Texas Corridor has been fully documented on the Web.”

This is the sort of reasoning we get from ‘Reason’ magazine? Never mind indeed, since NAFTA was originally proposed and drawn up during GHWB’s administration and passed in 1993 under Clinton. I-69 might have pre-dated NAFTA passage, but it sure didn’t pre-date NAFTA drafting and original presentation, and it sure didn’t pre-date NAFTA planning. They sound like concurrent projects to me.


10 posted on 09/24/2007 8:45:41 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kactus

Yes. I had thought of saying a bit more. For instance, who is behind this highway? What is the political background? Who are the players involved?


11 posted on 09/24/2007 8:53:06 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
I guess they're feeling a little bit of heat, because someone else has posted this. Please go to either one of those threads and leave a comment letting them know what you think.
12 posted on 09/24/2007 8:59:08 AM PDT by lonewacko_dot_com (http://lonewacko.com/blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

Those families with farms / ranches along the projected path might take exception to that “nuts” comment.

No one voted for this superhighway.

In Texas, it has done damage to the real estate market along the projected path and will end up being the largest eminent domain land grab in history.


13 posted on 09/24/2007 9:00:07 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 12th_Monkey

NO put it underground and let the government and state build it.


14 posted on 09/24/2007 9:00:10 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kactus
Toll roads for Cintra the Saudis and Ben laden family, to make money on US citizens’ backs.
15 posted on 09/24/2007 9:01:59 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 12th_Monkey
The farce concerning the Trans-Texas Corridor is that it is a four football field wide superhighway.

The truth...it is a network of four hundred yard wide superhighways.

One leg shoots from the Mexican border to Amarillo, the other is the I-35 leg which will run just west of Austin and the third leg is called the I-69, running west of Houston up through Grimes county.

http://www.texastollparty.com/ttp_trans_texas.php
http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/index.htm

These ( 3 ) legs of the TTC will decimate farms and ranches that have been in families for a hundred years.

This is Pres. Bush and Rick Perry’s lil globalist brain child that will ultimately circumvent the American trucking, longshore, port and all other associated industries for cheaper Mexican equivalents.

This is a bad thing for America.

16 posted on 09/24/2007 9:10:07 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
Yep, this is all a fantasy. Especially the cozy revolving door between the CFR, the fedgov, media and academia.

"Building a North American Community" by the Council on Foreign Relations.

Official US Gov SPP site

17 posted on 09/24/2007 9:34:52 AM PDT by Travis McGee (--www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777; dennisw
When this monstrosity is built, it will be a high-security wall dividing the USA. It will be far, far easier for illegal aliens to walk from Mexico into the USA than for Americans to cross the USA without passing through high security control points. The bridges across it will be scores of miles apart, channeling American citizens into a few easily monitored lanes.


18 posted on 09/24/2007 9:40:22 AM PDT by Travis McGee (--www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kactus

Strong rumblings that Texas Governor Rick Perry is somehow tied to Zachary Construction which appears to be a consortium of Texas people who have invested in this. Perry has said that he will not support closing the border between Mexico and Texas.


19 posted on 09/24/2007 9:50:32 AM PDT by Grams A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

AMERICAN CARGO CULT ——

All this brainless hyper consumerism will grind to a halt when the USD takes a dive and China and others stop exporting so many trinkets to us. These will be unused highways and unused rail links


20 posted on 09/24/2007 10:17:34 AM PDT by dennisw (France needs a new kind of immigrant — one who is "selected, not endured" - Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson