Skip to comments.
Parallel Universes Exist - Study
BreitBart/Press Association ^
| Sep 23, 2007
Posted on 09/24/2007 4:10:41 PM PDT by anymouse
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: SteveMcKing
It’s meaning inflation. This is the worst period of meaning inflation since the Carter Admin. Actually the worst in recorded history. Actually the worst since the beginning of all time.
21
posted on
09/24/2007 4:24:49 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
To: RightWhale
There is a thread exactly like this in a parallel universe. Except in that universe, I decided not to bother posting...
22
posted on
09/24/2007 4:25:12 PM PDT
by
Tanniker Smith
(I didn't know she was a Liberal when I married her.)
To: RightWhale
>There is a thread exactly like this in a parallel universe.
<
I’ll respond to that one...
23
posted on
09/24/2007 4:25:42 PM PDT
by
LRS
To: RightWhale
There is a thread exactly like this in a parallel universe. ....... which postulates that parallel universes DO NOT exist!!! /heheheheee
24
posted on
09/24/2007 4:26:15 PM PDT
by
Mr_Moonlight
(Sept 11 2001 ...... NEVER forget !)
To: anymouse
Parallel universes really do exist, according to a mathematical discovery by Oxford scientists described by one expert as "one of the most important developments in the history of science". Oh please, spare me the hyperbole.
No one has discovered anything, much less parallel universes. Someone has merely proposed a mathematical model to account for a result predicted by another mathematical model. Unfortunately, some scientists think their mathematics is more real than the real world.
To: anymouse
26
posted on
09/24/2007 4:26:46 PM PDT
by
GregoTX
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: anymouse
Parallel universes really do exist, according to a mathematical discovery by Oxford scientists described by one expert as "one of the most important developments in the history of science". And if the Feds would only grant us $100 billion of taxpayer money, we'd be all set.
Oh, BTW, these parallel universes only exist because of "global warming".
27
posted on
09/24/2007 4:27:14 PM PDT
by
michigander
(The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
To: anymouse
So I guess the problem now is how to insert an ensemble of states (i.e. instrumentation) into another space-time branch unobtrusively to collect data on other universes, and return to ours.
To: anymouse
According to this theory, a universe must exist, several, in fact, where Helen Thomas is considered a hottie. For that reason alone, the theory must be rejected as implausible.
29
posted on
09/24/2007 4:27:22 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(The 2nd Amendment isn't about sporting goods.)
To: anymouse
Better let Art Bell know about this...
30
posted on
09/24/2007 4:28:27 PM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: Brilliant
It’s all but inevitable. All universes except 1/googleplex percent of them are screwed up.
31
posted on
09/24/2007 4:28:48 PM PDT
by
Erasmus
(My simplifying explanation had the disconcerting side effect of making the subject incomprehensible.)
To: anymouse
“Commenting in New Scientist magazine, Dr Andy Albrecht, a physicist at the University of California at Davis, said: “This work will go down as one of the most important developments in the history of science.””
And in another universe it won’t.
To: anymouse
This is very exiting.
Thanks for the post.
33
posted on
09/24/2007 4:29:15 PM PDT
by
papasmurf
(I'm for Free, Fair, and Open trade. America needs to stand by it's true Friend. Israel.)
To: anymouse
Now if we could only figure out how this universe worked it would be a whole lot easier to figure out how that there parallel thingy worked.
34
posted on
09/24/2007 4:30:03 PM PDT
by
Tarpon
To: anymouse
You mean, those young ladies I could have but didn’t....when I was young...Dang! Any word on “parallel universe travel”? On second thought...nevermind.
35
posted on
09/24/2007 4:30:31 PM PDT
by
SaxxonWoods
(...."We're the govt, and we're here to hurt."....)
To: anymouse
" US physicist Hugh Everett, mysteries of quantum mechanics explains Mitt Romney and the parallel theory."
36
posted on
09/24/2007 4:30:51 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Proud father of a 10th Mountain veteran. Proud son of a WWII vet. Proud brother of vets.)
To: anymouse
If this theory is correct, we would have to imagine a universe where the Clintons are honest. That is not scientifically possible. Therefore, I do not believe the parallel universe theory.
37
posted on
09/24/2007 4:31:00 PM PDT
by
puroresu
(Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations.)
To: anymouse
That really Stunes my Beeber!
38
posted on
09/24/2007 4:33:48 PM PDT
by
Bullish
( Reality is the best cure for delusion.)
To: anymouse
where is ockham’s razor when you need it?
39
posted on
09/24/2007 4:34:42 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
To: papasmurf
This is very exiting. In a parallel universe it might even be considered exciting, as well as hugh and series ......
40
posted on
09/24/2007 4:35:21 PM PDT
by
Mr_Moonlight
(There are no typos in a parallel universe, as well as many typos, or no typos at all ... you decide)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-151 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson