To: rightwingintelligentsia
When private citizens start to believe that they can say whatever they want without being subject to the normal democratic process of selective sound-bite editing, and selective outrage, then its time for Congress to take action. LOL!
Michelle Malkin was right. This was generated because they needed their own "Betray Us" outrage following the debacle of the MoveOn.org ad.
It isn't working.
2 posted on
10/02/2007 4:49:07 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
To: rightwingintelligentsia
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Silly liberals! You just can't make this stuff up!Psst. I know
5 posted on
10/02/2007 4:56:22 AM PDT by
GreenAccord
(Bacon Akbar!)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
This is going nowhere: Rush wins again.
Liberal idiocy at its finest.
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I actually ran a Google search before realizing...
Just shows how idiotic the dems have become.
8 posted on
10/02/2007 5:01:58 AM PDT by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Phony Vets for Truth, an non-profit group comprised of ex-military personnel who have publicly and deceptively disparaged the United States, the president or fellow U.S. troops in time of war It seems to me as if fabrication of personal military experience is one of the most important attributes of a Phony Vet.
ML/NJ
10 posted on
10/02/2007 5:04:03 AM PDT by
ml/nj
To: rightwingintelligentsia
As a peruser of DU I have been following their reaction to the whole phony soldier story. At this point, they know they have lost, were caught, however you wish to put it, but refuse to accept defeat. One of the more telling threads I came across had this as the first response:
“Meanwhile, back in Iraq....”
This of course is meant to convey that the phony soldier story is keeping people from thinking about or talking about “important” issues and it is time to move on. It is also a very clear attempt to deflect. That in itself is a admission of defeat.
When confronted with the evidence of the manufacture of the attack on Rush, I have found that rather than discuss the issue, the majority of the comments, and I mean the VAST majority, are childish personal attacks on Rush, O’Reilly, Scarborough, or anyone else who dares question Mediamatters or any other member of the lynch mob.
They come across like little kids in a schoolyard who, failing to win a argument, resort to screeching and name calling. And they really hate it when the other side does does the mature thing by not screeching back in response.
11 posted on
10/02/2007 5:14:13 AM PDT by
Bogtrotter52
(Reading DU daily so you won't hafta)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
So has anyone compiled a list of all the phony soldiers trotted out by the left over the past few years?
I can recall several total impostors who detailed all kinds of supposed civilian abuse, and who ended up exposed as frauds, but I don’t recall their names.
12 posted on
10/02/2007 5:14:50 AM PDT by
WayneM
(Democrats - The Party of Traitors. (now a bi-partisan effort))
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Expect this assult on conservative talk radio to intensify into a firestorm. Media Matters, Move-on, and other front groups for the Left are actively listening to and recording conservative talk radio waiting for the one sound-bite that could end someones career, or grow support for more laws governing the airwaves.
Rush has always said when the Democrats are worried about losing control, when they are worried about being kicked out of power - thats when they get crazy, real crazy. That’s when they yell “banzai” and then go for the juggler of the opponents - but that’s also when they begin to show their true colors - and those colors don’t sit well with the moderates and swing voters.
To: rightwingintelligentsia
18 posted on
10/02/2007 5:44:07 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
More then anything else, I find it amazing how quickly a witch-hunt can move through the Senate...almost as if it had been preplanned.
Surely, the good people of Nevada are watching these events and planning for Reid’s political demise. Of course, the people in the district in Pennsylvania where I grew up keep electing Murtha which I can’t explain either.
21 posted on
10/02/2007 5:52:42 AM PDT by
remur389
To: Admin Moderator
Shouldn’t ‘SATIRE’ be in the title so that people like me don’t waste our time opening it?
22 posted on
10/02/2007 5:55:52 AM PDT by
Fawn
(http://www.brightlion.com/InHope/InHope_en.aspx)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Its Scrappleface but in this case I think the satire hits close to home because its true!
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
26 posted on
10/02/2007 6:09:00 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Ya gotta love Scott. Even his satire sounds devilishly close to the truth, which is what makes it so GOOD.
27 posted on
10/02/2007 6:10:07 AM PDT by
OCCASparky
(Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Ya gotta love Scott. Even his satire sounds devilishly close to the truth, which is what makes it so GOOD.
28 posted on
10/02/2007 6:10:08 AM PDT by
OCCASparky
(Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Rush is being phoney-boated
31 posted on
10/02/2007 6:24:07 AM PDT by
kidd
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I think I missed the part of the Constitution that says Congress shall smear a private civilian on the floor of the Congress.
33 posted on
10/02/2007 6:27:21 AM PDT by
ElectricStrawberry
(1/27 Wolfhounds...cut in half during the Clinton years.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
LOL! Scott Ott does it again! This is terrific satire!
39 posted on
10/02/2007 7:18:37 AM PDT by
SuziQ
To: rightwingintelligentsia
47 posted on
10/02/2007 11:58:21 AM PDT by
davidlachnicht
("IF WE'RE ALL TO BE TARGETS, THEN WE ALL MUST BE SOLDIERS.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson