Posted on 10/02/2007 5:20:11 AM PDT by SJackson
“Have contempt for the sin and not the sinner.”
Even Jesus said “Go and sin no more.”
Those who continue sinful ways need to be called on it.
You don’t throw up your hands and say “Oh well”
When Islam (Anti-Christ) finally is in control the sodomites will be the first to feel their wrath. Along , of course, with the Christians , and Jews. “and who can make war against him?”
Just my take......
“Even Jesus said “Go and sin no more.””
Yes he did. He also said we should go out among the sinners to bring them in.
“Those who continue sinful ways need to be called on it.”
Of course regardless of the sin. Does that mean we should shout Hurray when a sinner is hanged or tortured? Many of the comments on this thread were not Christian and are not what I want representing my faith. Hateful comments such as these push people away from salvation.
Be careful though. Despite Islamists hatred for gays, don’t let our common interest in the advancement of Western culture be turned into a gay plank here. The gay agenda for special protected treatment cannot get mixed up in this.
Amehdinigad never denied the use of camels.
There is a great cartoon at the link but I can’t post it.
http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/
Yet it is a widespread practice of Imam's running the madrasa's to have their way with their students. In Pakistani madrasa's anal sex is common, although they don't view it as homosexuality. It's considered a strike against the west for Islam to have anal sex with a western man.
Another common practice in Islamic countries is something called "thighing", placing the penis between the thighs of a young child, a common act done during gatherings for celebrations such as weddings. It's called mufa’khathat which means literally translated, it means “placing between the thighs”
Muslims don't view gay sex as homosexuality. It's just sex, no different than humping a goat or a favorite she-camel; after all, Mohammad had a "special" she camel he had sex with, so it must be ok if Mohammad did it, just as they view "thighing" ok because Mohammad did it.
Although it's officially frowned upon, it's a common practice.
This is the official Islamic explanation of thighing:
Question 1809
After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwahs (religious decrees) reviewed the question forwarded by the grand scholar of the committee with reference number 1809 issued on 3/5/1453 and 7/5/1421 (Islamic calendar)
Question: ‘It has become widespread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufa’khathat of the children. (mufa’khathat - literally translated, it means “placing between the thighs” which means placing the male member between the thighs of a child) What is the opinion of scholars, knowing full well that the prophet, the peace of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha - the mother of believers - may Allah be pleased with her.’
Answer: After studying the issue, the committee has answered as follows:
As for the prophet, thighing his fiancée Aisha when she was six years of age and not able to consummate the relationship due to her small age. That is why the Prophet used to place his male member between her thighs and massage it, as the prophet had control of his male member not like other men.
Other views on sex by Iranians:
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, the Shia Grand Ayatollah, 1979-89 said in his official statements:
"A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life.(just as Mohammad was to Aisha after he damaged her) This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister. It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband's house rather than her father's home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven."
Khomeini, "Tahrirolvasyleh" fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990
Islam is a sick, sick demented cult.
High volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel, WOT
..................
According to Islam, it’s expected that men should bang under-aged boys in the butt...as long as they say they didn’t really enjoy it. That would be gay.
A very good question that's obviously lost on those caught up in the nicey, nicey, feel good new age movement and political correctness. These same people who are incapable of understanding yours and my point are the same ones that will turn the other cheek as 1.5 million American children are burned alive and sucked out of their mother's wombs writhing in pain each year.
God calls such people "Hypocrites" and liars. They are nothing less than the children of their father, the father of lies, Satan!
“Strangest of all is the scenario of such a person disliking an author for defending Western civilization against radical Islam — when one of the first things those poor, persecuted Islamists would do, if they ever (Allah forbid) came to power in the U.S., is crush suspected homosexuals like him beneath walls.”
Socialism is a mental illness.
Yes sirreebob! Absolutely correct and truthful.
Their gays:
Our gays:
Homosexuals & bisexuals, OTOH, they have in plenty...as well as an over abundance of child molesters, beastialists, mysoginist sadists, and other assorted pimps, panderers, and perverts.
The liberals don’t care. Same as dimocrats don’t care about blacks, yet they still rush to the polls to vote for dimocrats. They, the liberals, simply do not give a flying F about anything but themselves, their agenda, and their so called followers. They sicken me beyond thought and belief.
Well, that is a fitting description for most uber-liberals, not just homos...........
In truth; Ahmadinejad was truthful. . .as could be. There probably are no homosexuals left in Iran. . .and those rising; surely know not to betray their own truth.
Do these Libs actually believe they have a friend here. . .Yesssss; they do.
In truth; Ahmadinejad was truthful. . .as could be. There probably are no homosexuals left in Iran. . .and those rising; surely know not to betray their own truth.
Do these Libs actually believe they have a friend here. . .Yesssss; they do.
I did just that when Uday & Qusay (sp?) where blown to bits.
Come to think of it, I cheered when I read we had killed over 18,000 terrorists in Iraq.
For liberals, the “gay” cause (and by that I don’t mean acceptance of a gay as a person with dignity, which is, for example, mandatory if you are a Catholic but of “gay” acts, such as marriage and adoption, etc.)is merely a means to an end towards the the destruction of Western Judeo-Christian Civilization, which is their overarching goal since at least the 18th Century. (I should note that liberals are responsible for more deaths than any other philosophy, indeed they have killed 40 Million Americans since 1973).
Here, the the Liberals understand that the greatest enemy of Western Civilization is Islamofascism, and that if they need to break some eggs to make an omelet (have some gay people die) so be it. They no that it would only help their cause.
“I did just that when Uday & Qusay (sp?) where blown to bits.
Come to think of it, I cheered when I read we had killed over 18,000 terrorists in Iraq.”
There is a difference between a terrorist and most of the gays.
That is disgusting sadistic stuff—these people are just vile and filthy. May they all rot in hell (and they surely will)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.