BTW, Plutarch, are you have NYT stock? I'm sure that your cruising for trash day after day is raising them a pretty advertising penny. Just wondering.
Back in the day, when Hunter was more in vogue than now, Pissant and I had a quite a few exchanges over the merits of Duncan Hunter. Pissant, however, would make substantial posts ably defending DH (and faulting Romney) rather than just chiding me personally.
You two post the same kind of anti-FRed garbage with the same kind of comments.
I am sorry to see that you consider the pieces I (and Pissant) have posted garbage. Are all news articles that might reflect negatively on Fred automatically garbage in your view, or are some potentially legitimate? I can't imagine any such article from any source that I could post that you wouldn't consider garbage, and thus in your view FR should be a Fred la la land in which nothing negative is ever posted. While we are at it, why even bother with the all this primary process foolishness? FDT should just be offered the nomination now, no questions asked.
BTW, Plutarch, are you have NYT stock?
Regrettably, some of the news articles I've posted are from the NYT. There are probably only a handful of national reporters following FDT's campaign, and these will be from the likes of the NYT and Washington Post. Thus, the first person reporting which is most the most specific, and thus credible and telling will necessarily be from a notorious liberal source. I've posted articles from alternative sources, such as Politico, and Wall Street Journal, and it is my impression that Fredheads are no less dismissive of the source. Is there a news source that you would consider legitimate, save for BlogsforFred? Let me know, and I will look for articles from a source more to your liking.