Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GE to Ohio: Turn off your light-bulb factories
Salon.com ^ | October 5, 2007 | Andrew Leonard

Posted on 10/06/2007 7:49:52 AM PDT by 1rudeboy

Environmentalists often tout the theory that investing in forward-looking energy-efficient technologies is a smart way for U.S. companies to create domestic jobs and carve out a competitive niche in the global economy of the future. But it doesn't necessarily have to work out that way. On Thursday, General Electric, citing the fact that sales of incandescent bulbs are declining by about 10 percent a year, announced that it was closing seven lighting manufacturing facilities in North and South America.

Six of those plants are in Ohio. The vast majority of the compact fluorescent light bulbs that are replacing incandescents are manufactured in China. A union-led campaign launched in March argues that GE should invest in new lighting technologies in the United States, but GE claims that to manufacture CFLs in the U.S. would require adding 50 cents to the price of each bulb.

(At Screwthatbulb.org, a site created by the Communications Workers of America, the union claims that the European Commission banned Chinese-manufactured CFLs, but that assertion is not correct. There is a steep tariff on Chinese CFLs in the EU, but even so, two-thirds of the CFLs sold in Europe are made in China.)

A story in the Youngstown, Ohio, Vindicator covering the closing of two local plants serves as a minor elegy for every factory forced to close by the pressures of globalization.

GE said Thursday the Austintown Products Plant and Niles Glass Plant are to be shut down Nov. 1, 2008, with production shipped to foreign plants or outside suppliers....

The Austintown plant, which has 73 workers, is one of three plants that make filaments for incandescent bulbs. [A spokesman for GE] said production volumes for these bulbs are down, so the company now can fill all of its orders at the other plants, which are in Mexico and Hungary....

So, yet another paradox that may not bear too much pondering, if one wants to make it through the day. Replacing your incandescents with CFLs will cut your electricity bill, there's little doubt about that, but it will also contribute to job loss in Ohio, and the likely increase of industrial pollution in China.

-- Andrew Leonard


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: ge; lightbulbs; manufacturing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-299 next last
Something the folks who fear trade is the problem need to consider more often.
1 posted on 10/06/2007 7:49:54 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Where’s Willie Green when you need him?


2 posted on 10/06/2007 7:52:19 AM PDT by Seruzawa (Attila the Hun... wasn't he a liberal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Unintended consequences of green socialists in a free market.

3 posted on 10/06/2007 7:53:18 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

“...but GE claims that to manufacture CFLs in the U.S. would require adding 50 cents to the price of each bulb.”

Worth it.

But the trade-off to GE investing in the US should be to de-certify any unions at any of these plants.


4 posted on 10/06/2007 7:53:36 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
But the trade-off to GE investing in the US should be to de-certify any unions at any of these plants.

And what will that do? Union or no, the cost of U.S. workers will always far exceed the cost of Chinese workers until you can start hiring Ohioans at $2 a day.

5 posted on 10/06/2007 7:55:34 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
--Ronald Reagan

6 posted on 10/06/2007 7:56:10 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

But yet (if the figure is true), we are talking about 50 cents per bulb. There’s more to the equation.


7 posted on 10/06/2007 7:57:51 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
another fact that you aren’t going to see in the press is that you are not allowed to trash those bulbs in the EU.

They have to taken to special recycling plants since the EU has declared that the constituents in them contribute ... to ... global ... warming. guess who pays for that?

I do not believe in unintended consequences.
I believe that what is happening is exactly what the socialists want to happen, and that is the economic crippling of America.

Hey, you can work at the Burger King or even in Health Care under (hillary!)

Lots of Nation building production in that...

8 posted on 10/06/2007 7:58:09 AM PDT by bill1952 (The 10 most important words for change: "If it is to be, it is up to me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

I live in Germany....and every bulb you buy...has to go to some recycling center. Same deal with batteries. Over past twenty years...they’ve built this huge system of recycling....into an empire. I end up paying $300 a year for trash pick-up...which includes all recycled goods...which I get nothing for my plastic or paper...the company running the operation claims all of the profit.


9 posted on 10/06/2007 8:03:11 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

(s) Do you know how expesive it is to bribe an american politician vs a foreign politician? (/s)


10 posted on 10/06/2007 8:07:32 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Hey, thank you for pointing out the facts.

You cannot find any mention of this type of stuff here.

My father’s side is probably from around the Hamburg area, but I’ve never looked into it very far.


11 posted on 10/06/2007 8:09:24 AM PDT by bill1952 (The 10 most important words for change: "If it is to be, it is up to me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

The American problem:

We hate foreign workers that work for cheap wages, and we hate for American workers to work for cheap wages.

We always say “Buy American, regardless of price” and then go to Wal Mart and buy the cheapest price item.

......Bob


12 posted on 10/06/2007 8:09:42 AM PDT by Lokibob (Some people are like slinkys. Useless, but if you throw them down the stairs, you smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

See also:
GE Will Speed Contraction Of Incandescent-Bulb Business (1400 layoffs)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1906869/posts

That CFLs won’t be made here doesn’t matter all that much.

The future of lighting is probably LED,
and CFLs will not be a factor by 2010 or so.

The trick will be disposing of your CFLs before
they are declared hazardous waste.
_________
I use CFLs.
Won’t miss ‘em.


13 posted on 10/06/2007 8:10:24 AM PDT by Boundless (Legacy Media is hazardous to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“And what will that do? Union or no, the cost of U.S. workers will always far exceed the cost of Chinese workers until you can start hiring Ohioans at $2 a day.”

The new Chinese plants don’t use humans to the extent that the existing plants use humans. Even in China, there is growing concern that all of the new factories are very highly mechanized, requiring only the occasional technician’s tender touch.

What is definitely cheaper in China is the cost of complying w/ environmental concerns, OSHA, HIPAA, etc etc ad nauseum.


14 posted on 10/06/2007 8:11:27 AM PDT by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

“The future of lighting is probably LED, and CFLs will not be a factor by 2010 or so.”

bingo.

And, the LEDs will be made by machines, with only a few techs needed to keep them running. I’d be willing to bet the number of human hours needed to produce a given hour of light bulb usage will decline drastically with the LEDs.


15 posted on 10/06/2007 8:13:29 AM PDT by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green; Seruzawa
GE claims that to manufacture CFLs in the U.S. would require adding 50 cents to the price of each bulb.

Are these executives Americans or not?

Geez -- throwing their fellow Americans under the bus for a lousy 50 cents!

16 posted on 10/06/2007 8:13:58 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
“...but GE claims that to manufacture CFLs in the U.S. would require adding 50 cents to the price of each bulb.”

Fine. Slap a $.55 tariff on bulbs made in China. GE's quandary is solved.

17 posted on 10/06/2007 8:14:40 AM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
They have to taken to special recycling plants since the EU has declared that the constituents in them contribute ... to ... global ... warming

Not global warming (AFAIK) but mercury pollution.

18 posted on 10/06/2007 8:15:41 AM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BearCub
Fine. Slap a $.55 tariff on bulbs made in China. GE's quandary is solved.

Exactly

19 posted on 10/06/2007 8:16:24 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
The future of lighting is probably LED,

Correct. The problem is that directionality in LEDs doesn't come cheap. Fixing that problem for cheap will take some amazing machinery and process development. Could be fun.

and CFLs will not be a factor by 2010 or so.

I hope you're right. They suck.

The trick will be disposing of your CFLs before
they are declared hazardous waste.

Too late for that, and it's not just the mercury.

20 posted on 10/06/2007 8:17:40 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-299 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson