Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/06/2007 12:23:24 PM PDT by Rick_Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Rick_Michael

You mean we finally catch a break? Cool.

IBTH


2 posted on 10/06/2007 12:25:49 PM PDT by papasmurf (I'm for Free, Fair, and Open trade. America needs to stand by it's true Friend. Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rick_Michael

Good.


3 posted on 10/06/2007 12:27:43 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rick_Michael

IOW, Rudy is Toooooooooooooooaaaaaaaaaaaaaaast!


9 posted on 10/06/2007 1:01:35 PM PDT by Grunthor (I'd be Catholic but I don't speak latin and don't wanna learn just to go to church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rick_Michael

Works for me!


12 posted on 10/06/2007 1:16:39 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rick_Michael
So far there hasn't been a breakout candidate in the republican race. Guiliani seems strong in the "blue" states while Thompson is running strong in the red states, Romney is also running strong in a few states, I believe.

If things stay this way through the primary season, we may be in a situation that we haven't seen in a long time - the republican nominee not being known until the convention. With both Guiliani and Thompson wheeling and dealing with the also-rans behind the scenes for delegates.

How this would effect the presidential race is hard to tell...

It might actually draw some much needed interest and suspense to the republican covention, especially if the democrat candidate is coronated early in the process. It may also make it difficult for the democrats to run against a candidate before the covention if they aren't sure who they will be running against.

On the negative side, it could make the republican party appear to be split and indecisive. There could also be fund raising problems with no clear nominee.

21 posted on 10/06/2007 3:36:25 PM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rick_Michael
GREAT NEWS!! Fred08 - Contribute Now
25 posted on 10/06/2007 4:25:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (https://www.fred08.com/contribute.aspx?RefererID=c637caaa-315c-4b4c-9967-08d864cd0791)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rick_Michael

ok would somebody please explain how this fits in with the early primaries Guiliani’s camp was negotiating.

Were all those early manuvers now exposed a pointless?


33 posted on 10/06/2007 8:43:57 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rick_Michael
Only two of the past 13 GOP presidential nominees since then — Gerald Ford in 1976 and Bob Dole in 1996 — have not been from the Sun Belt.

Eisenhower was from Kansas, which is hardly the Sun Belt. He may have been born in Texas, but he moved to Abilene, Kansas when he was 1 year old and spent his whole youth there. He retired to Pennsylvania.

Bush Sr. may have listed Texas as his home state, but had equally strong ties to the Northeast.

Furthermore, this article define both the west coast and the south as the 'Sunbelt', when they're two very different places.

In fact, the last 13 Republican presidential nominees have been:

That seems like pretty good geographical balance to me

57 posted on 10/07/2007 3:26:36 PM PDT by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson