Exhibit "A"
Posted on 10/08/2007 8:00:54 AM PDT by Rummyfan
Last week, a London court began pondering the vexed question of whether Diana, Princess of Wales was, ahem, murdered. There was so much public suspicion, declared the coroner, Lord Justice Scott Baker, that it was time for the rumors to be either "dispelled or substantiated."
So who killed her? On the night of Diana's death, there were apparently two top agents for MI6, the British secret service, on the loose in Paris, and possibly a third, if you believe Henri Paul, the chauffeur, was also on the spooks' payroll. That's the theory of Mohammed Fayed, Messr. Paul's employer and father of the princess' last boyfriend Dodi. Mr. Fayed asserts Diana at the time of her death was carrying Dodi's baby, and thus the car crash was arranged because Buckingham Palace decided it would be unacceptable for Prince William, the future king, to have a Muslim step-brother, a Muslim stepdad, and a soon-to-be-Muslim mom.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
mark
Exhibit "A"
Yep.....I remember co-worker women where I worked stayed up till 2-3am to watch THE wedding......I thought that was rather stupid....and I was in the perfect age group and life stage (single and 30) to be enthralled with it all. HA...knowing what’s important in life....maybe that’s the key to a LONG life.
You have a better term for a married woman that had a child by another man, I’d love to read it here in the forum.
Same thing I saw...I still don’t ‘get it’.
I’m not even sure that IS a wommin.
Worse, Mother Theresa died within days of her. Barely a mention in the press.
The world loves a great rack, but is just so-so on celebrating a life devoted to service to poor children. And worse, she was a Christian. Definitely nothing to see there. Let’s cover the dead royal hottie with the decent rack who agreed to marry a whack job in a whacked out family, and then decided to cheat with whomever.
Unless you know that for a fact, it is nothing more than supposition on your part.
Supposition does not make for a good argument, unless one works for the media or is a liberal. Kinda the same thing I guess. : )
‘You have a better term for a married woman that had a child by another man
Unless you know that for a fact, it is nothing more than supposition on your part.’
Sorry, I have two working eyes, and have seen the pics of both the ‘riding instructor’ and the youngest ‘royal’.
Thats his kid. The fact the House of Windsor refused to allow a DNA test speaks for itself. The fact Diana admitted the moment Charles saw the son he realized who’s it was, and that was the moment she claimed ‘her marriage died’ is public record.
Now that we’ve cleared this up, again I’ll ask the question.
Do you have a better term for a woman that had a child by a man not her husband then the one used up above?
If you don’t, just say so. If you do, offer it up.
Is that true? re the riding instructor? whooeee, where’ve I been?
According to Diana’s own words, yes it is.
Saw a picture of the ‘riding instructor’ and the youngest ‘royal’ a couple of weeks ago in the run up to the tenth ‘anniversary’.
There is no mistaking its the riding instructor’s son. None what so ever.
Perhaps somebody will post the two pictures side by side on this thread...and give the forum a chance to see what I’m talking about.
Sure, blame the woman, call her a bimbo. What about the vow that Charles took? He had as much obligation to honor them for queen and country as Diana did.
Certainly she was nieve, as young brides are, expecting him to honor her as his wife, not to make a fool of her with Camilla. Charles had a right to buck the palace and the crown and marry Camilla if that's what he really wanted. Instead he was a coward, a liar and a cheat and a sneak.
The woman who 'had it all' had everything except what she wanted most of all - a marriage. She grew beautifully into her position as a royal, being considered a commoner. And she was a fantastic mother, raising at least one balanced and worth-while son.
I'm sure it was a great sadness to her that she was forced to look elsewhere for the affection and love due her from her husband.
Charles is the cad here and IMHO he killed her as sure as if he'd plunged a knife into her - which he did; he plunged a knife into her heart. It is unforgiveable to give him a pass on honoring his marriage vows.
What gives with you conservatives anyway? She certainly did not start it.
The article is about ‘her’ not ‘him’.
For the record, I think he’s a walking advertisment for all thats wrong with interbreeding, and ‘royalty’.
This isn’t about ‘conservatives’, sheesh, get a grip.
And given the tone you struck with that out of the blue comment, why are you here at Free Republic?
There might be a medal for someone in MI6.
Obviously female, and apparently not a conservative, either.
Yes and yes....(chuckle)
Thank you very much.
Who’s ears are those?
“...you can do anything you want as long as you don’t do it in the street and startle the horses”
Love that!
And to those of us here bringing out the slut and whore name-calling crap, please stop. The poor woman is dead and did nothing to any one of you.
Diana did some terrific things in her life, but she was in NO WAY an example for how a woman (or anyone) should behave and that is (or should be) obvious. Her conduct was trashy and not befitting of a princess or a lady. I believe that is a fair concluion to draw, I do not find name-calling fair or appropriate.
She was killed in a car crash while being chased by disgusting paparazzi leeches. It was and is a tragedy. Let’s not make it worse by trashing a dead woman. Please?
-not a bad eye there, although I will not concede the point.....at least he was better looking than hubble.......but then Di was better looking than the beast......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.