Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/08/2007 5:13:46 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

She's pandering to her Jewish supporters the same was GWB pandered to his Evangelical supporters in 2000 and 2004 over moving the Embassy to Jerusalem. Same coin, different sides.

2 posted on 10/08/2007 5:14:54 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
The ridiculous brouhaha over her Suha Arafat kiss (a brouhaha only among the Jewish right) has produced a hawkish course correction.

M.J. Rosenberg is a moron. After all, only the Jewish right gets upset about coddling terrorists and someone who just gave a speech that amounted to a blood libel against the Jews. /s off

3 posted on 10/08/2007 5:19:01 PM PDT by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Not the Jewish community at large, which overwhelmingly supports the two-state solution and Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank.
-
a state for Hamas terrorists?

I guess he polled Jews who want to commit suicide and I don’t mean those at Masada.


4 posted on 10/08/2007 5:22:34 PM PDT by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Has Hillary picked out her new Jews to pardon during this election?


5 posted on 10/08/2007 5:23:05 PM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0 (Che was a racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
In her new position paper on Israel, Hillary Rodham Clinton comes not only to praise the Jewish state but to bury doubts that she would be any less vigilant in its protection than the Bush administration.

This says to me that she will drop Israel like a hot potato in her swift attempts to appease the Islamofascists.
6 posted on 10/08/2007 5:27:38 PM PDT by monkeycard (There is no such thing as too much ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

She is a liar.


7 posted on 10/08/2007 5:29:08 PM PDT by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
M.J. Rosenberg

Disgusting little moonbat fascist faggot.

10 posted on 10/08/2007 5:31:21 PM PDT by Alouette (Vicious Babushka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
The position paper, published this week, goes so far as to outflank President Bush from the right.

I guess Hillary really does have the Democrat nomination wrapped up. With all the Democrat votes bought and paid for, she has nothing to lose by running as the Republican in the race.

11 posted on 10/08/2007 5:32:14 PM PDT by AZLiberty (President Fred -- I like the sound of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Time to re-post the Hill-Arafat kiss pic.


12 posted on 10/08/2007 5:34:45 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Lies, lies, and more lies. Will the Jewish people here fall for it? Most likely.


16 posted on 10/08/2007 5:48:22 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

FINALLY she’s got ONE right!!! Guess she has more Jews supporting her than Muslims!! Wonder if the American Muslim Council (she listed it on her forms as American MUSEUM Council) wants their money back!


19 posted on 10/08/2007 5:51:24 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary '08...Her PHONINESS is REAL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
I wonder if Hillary is the (Israel) hawk she is pretending to be.

Aside from her pandering to Jewish donors, Hillary will be no more of a hawk than her predecessors, and probably less. How long have politicians crooned about an undivided Jerusalem? Yet how many politicians have we seen dance around their promises to move the US Embassy to Jerusalem?

During an election year, believe nothing. Of course they will say the sanctity of the Jewish state must be defended. Of course they will bluster about their faith and their roots. But after the election, when all that matters is poll data and spin, Hillary like all the others will waffle and dance and we'll see the old 2-state 2-step redux all over again. And I'll wager that Hillary will be pandering to the Muslims over Jerusalem. I'll bet a dollar.

20 posted on 10/08/2007 6:02:20 PM PDT by Sender (Can I just post until I need glasses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Some people have short memories.

23 posted on 10/08/2007 7:27:58 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Democrat Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Memo to the rabbis that support Queen Jezebel: If you think Evil Evita is going to really support a strong, safe Israel and an undivided Jerusalem as its capital, then you need to stop smoking the cheap stuff. Evita will turn on Israel like Jezebel did toward Elijah and the faithful priests of Yaweh in the Old Testament.


24 posted on 10/09/2007 4:55:16 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (Hunter and Tancredo in '08! La Raza - the PLO of the Western Hemisphere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson