A realistic one. Ann Coulter explained it pretty well, if you care to read about it.
Romney or Giuliani are the two who have a realistic chance of being elected. That's just a cold, hard fact.
I won’t support Mitt. Not in this primary, and not in the general election.
Better to be a 100%'er and happily sit out the vote, eh? That's effectively the same as a vote for whoever wins. Why not support the candidate who is most likely to win and gives you most of what you want? Better to have 60% of what you want than 90% of what you don't, I'd think.
We have other choices - almost ALL of them are better that Mitt. (at least Guiliani can win. Can Romney?)
Gosh, I dunno. Maybe Romney has a track record you can check as it relates to success and winning. That should answer your question.
I can't answer for you. Maybe you really would prefer Giuliani to Romney. I know I wouldn't.
Just how far are you comfortable going to make sure Mitt isn't elected?
Is Ann Coulter your new God? She has great conservative opinions, but they are just that...opinions.
I don’t think Mitt can win. Once the Dem machinery gets hold of him, he’s sunk. They are hoping he gets the nomination - - he’ll be the easiest to take out.
There are plenty of pundits who put Fred in the list of realistic candidates. I prefer to believe them. Thanks anyway.