Skip to comments.
L.O.S.T. Treaty (anti!) Resolution from the Oregon Republican Party
Oregon Republican Party ^
Posted on 10/10/2007 8:24:52 PM PDT by jeffgr1776
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: jeffgr1776
It appears that President Bush is intent on turning this country into a globalist country before he gets out. If he was pulling this stunt two years ago he just might not be President today.
2
posted on
10/10/2007 8:27:35 PM PDT
by
taxesareforever
(Never forget Matt Maupin)
To: jeffgr1776
3
posted on
10/10/2007 8:41:38 PM PDT
by
processing please hold
(Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
To: taxesareforever
I’m telling all of you Pubbie kool-aid drinkers, this guy in the WH will go down as another loser like all of these presidents over the past 60 yrs ( Reagan excluded). If GW was on the ballot again there is absolutely no way I would vote for this puppet to the destruction of America via these globalists. It;s to the point that like his adopted brother, the impeached one, I won’t look at him when on the TV. The corrupt “Two-Party Cartel” has pulled another one over on you & you will do the same thing in this next election.
4
posted on
10/10/2007 8:45:02 PM PDT
by
Digger
(If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
To: jeffgr1776
Good for the Oregon Republican Party, of which I was a central committee for many years, for this resolution against L.O.S.T.. I would like to see this resolution passed by the Republican Party of every state in the union.
Bush is going to push this and his comprehensive amnesty policy for illegal invaders hard. This is the “capital” he spoke of after being re-elected to his lame duck term. He has nothing to lose so he will do all he can to further the One World Government goal of the globalists.
He has even called in the World Court to intervene in the execution of an illegal alien convicted and condemned in Texas for the gruelling rape and murder of two teenage girls there! The president of the U.S. is actually appealing to a foreign court to influence the judicial decision of an American court!!!!! What else will he not do?!!!!
5
posted on
10/10/2007 8:49:54 PM PDT
by
Paperdoll
( Duncan Hunter '08)
To: jeffgr1776; abcraghead; aimhigh; Archie Bunker on steroids; bicycle thug; blackie; coffeebreak; ...
Oregon Ping Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Oregon Ping List.
6
posted on
10/10/2007 8:55:01 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: jeffgr1776
To: jeffgr1776
I was listening to the hearings about the LOST on C-SPAN. Many current and former top Navy people were testifying that it is in our interest to sign the LOST, principally because it will clarify many things which are very ambiguous under the framework of prior treaties. They said that there are many rumors about the treaty that are not true, a lot of them concerning UN powers granted by the treaty. They said that the only way the UN is connected with the treaty is that the UN organized the meetings of countries where the treaty was negotiated.
They said that we are establishing our own rights and not only granting them to foreign countries and that on balance this is in our favor. They said that they are satisfied with language in the treaty concerning the free movement of military ships.
These guys did not seem like traitors to me.
Here's the Wikipedia article on the LOST.
To: wideminded
Wake up, dude. We don’t “establish our rights” by signing treaties. We LIMIT them.
9
posted on
10/10/2007 9:19:57 PM PDT
by
Iconoclast2
(Two wings of the same bird of prey . . .)
To: jeffgr1776
Wow, who knew there were still real conservatives on the West Coast?
10
posted on
10/10/2007 9:28:15 PM PDT
by
DesScorp
To: DesScorp
Yup, and we beleive in, and practice, political trench warfare.
To: jeffgr1776
I really don’t know anything about this yet, but IF I accept anything coming out of Oregon as even halfway true, then there seem to be sizeable problems with this. Given Bush’s recent track record, I believe that he needs to be stopped. I will be checking with my Senators on this.
12
posted on
10/10/2007 9:49:16 PM PDT
by
matthew fuller
(Move SF Fleet Week to a real AMERICAN city.)
To: jeffgr1776; pandoraou812
I’m with ORP on this. Bush is lost. Supporting this is as enigmatic as his open borders policy. It’s not American.
13
posted on
10/10/2007 10:20:41 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Hillary can tap Hsus but she can't tuna fish.)
To: matthew fuller
Hit the keyword ‘lost’ or Google ‘lost treaty.’ You will quickly see how devious this is and be mystified by who you find supporting it.
14
posted on
10/10/2007 10:22:29 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Hillary can tap Hsus but she can't tuna fish.)
To: TigersEye
Bush & I don’t agree on very much these days.
15
posted on
10/10/2007 10:23:54 PM PDT
by
pandoraou812
( zero tolerance to the will of Allah & Muslims ...... dilligaf? with an efg.....)
To: wideminded
Google Frank Gafney(sp?) and LOST. He is no lightweight on foreign affairs and U.S. sovereignty and he isn’t too keen on LOST. But he is informative.
16
posted on
10/10/2007 10:25:26 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Hillary can tap Hsus but she can't tuna fish.)
To: pandoraou812
He is great on some things and a complete mystery on others.
I don't like knocking him because people stop listening when you do.
But this, the border and all that spending on social programs isn't good.
17
posted on
10/10/2007 10:28:07 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Hillary can tap Hsus but she can't tuna fish.)
To: TigersEye
But this, the border and all that spending on social programs isn't good.
No they aren't. I don't knock him but I sure have given up on understanding him anymore.
18
posted on
10/10/2007 10:30:20 PM PDT
by
pandoraou812
( zero tolerance to the will of Allah & Muslims ...... dilligaf? with an efg.....)
To: Digger
No president will ever do everything you or I or anyone would want him to do. All we can do is cast a vote for the one we believe will act the most toward the interest of the U.S. It may not always turn out the way we want it but what other choice does one have? Would it have been better to have Gore or Kerry in? I certainly don’t think so.
19
posted on
10/10/2007 10:50:55 PM PDT
by
taxesareforever
(Never forget Matt Maupin)
To: processing please hold
You mean “Good for Oregon Republican Party”. I certainly doubt that the Oregon democrats would sign onto this.
20
posted on
10/10/2007 10:52:30 PM PDT
by
taxesareforever
(Never forget Matt Maupin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson