Posted on 10/15/2007 9:45:49 AM PDT by doug from upland
WATCH HILLARY DISCUSS HER DARTMOUTH WINTER CARNIVAL BLIND DATE AT SPAGO.
HILLARY UNCENSORED TO BE SHOWN AT DARTMOUTH ON OCT. 27
Hillary remembers nothing of what was discussed at Spago? The blind date got drunk. He was a California surfer, and Peter knew the guy. In freezing winter, he stripped down to his swimming trunks, got his surfboard, and tried to surf the golf course moguls. Everyone watched, and they were worried that he would freeze to death. Hillary can't remember anything they discussed? There is much more film. She will be confronted with the fill during her deposition. Folks, Hillary turned in a perjurious declaration to the court.
“I do not remember any of statements I may have made to Mr. Paul during one or perhaps both of these events.”
It is a good thing Peter has an hour of home video from Spago. They discussed Castro, Bert Lance, Winter Carnival, and not using email because she didn’t want them subpoenaed. She went nuts over the idea for an Algore character called THE SILICON SURFER. This is perjury.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
She didn’t say she wasn’t there. She says she didn’t REMEMBER what was discussed. (despite the fact that she remembers this blind date in 1966....) She is the queen of selective memory loss.
And despite the fact that she’s one of the two most accomplished liars in American history, she will continued to be protected by the MSM and Clinton-appointed judges. The average Joe in the street will know little of this and what little is brought to light will be convincingly explained away.
I wish you all the best, Doug, but you’re wasting your time. As Donovan wrote, ‘You may as well try and catch the wind.’
She has a 100% chance of being inducted into the Liars Hall of Fame. The only problem is it won’t happen until she is beaten or out of office.
It is also so nice to hear negative comments from those who sit on their *** and don’t at least try to spread the message. Thanks for stopping by.
The only way to prove the affidavit is perjurous is to have a tape or video/audio of her saying she does remember things that she avers she doesn’t.
I understand perjury. We don’t have to convince a jury. We have to convince a small percentage of the electorate to make a difference in this election. Are you going to try to help?
Peter Paul.
Ooops.
Sorry.
Fast typing, low accuracy!
But here's a bttt for ya all the same....
She will never be convicted of anything, but we have to change some minds or she is going to be in the Oval Office again. I need lots of help changing minds.
Doug,
Keep up the good fight. In the next year Hillary must get her negatives down if she is to have a chance of winning.
What you are doing provides solid, 100% evidence that Hillary is dishonest and not deserving of elected office.
This won’t bother the die-hard liberals but will influence the independants who still look for good character in their elected officials.
Doug,
Keep up the good fight. In the next year Hillary must get her negatives down if she is to have a chance of winning.
What you are doing provides solid, 100% evidence that Hillary is dishonest and not deserving of elected office.
This won’t bother the die-hard liberals but will influence the independants who still look for good character in their elected officials.
Except that also swore that she WOULD have remembered if such conversations had taken place. Therefore, simply proving with documentary evidence that they took place should be sufficient.
Bingo. That is the plan.
bttt
I explain why one cannot, on the evidence available at this time, prove that Hillary perjured herself. You than respond in part: I understand perjury. We don’t have to convince a jury. We have to convince a small percentage of the electorate to make a difference in this election.
and ask me the following question: Are you going to try to help?
If you are asking me to help prevent Hitlery from getting elected, absolutely.
If you are asking me, and it sure looks like you are, to help prevent Hitlery from getting elected by misrepresenting the nature of her declaration, absolutely not.
I WILL NOT conduct myself in the manner of the Democrats and the Clinton camp. Period.
I will not assert that she perjured herself since I can't prove it - and her statement is cleverly crafted to be challenge-proof, absent a smoking gun.
In my field, "I can't remember" equals "I know but don't want to admit what I know." Anyone that hears the first statement, immediately translates the testimony into the second. No one voices their opinion, since the accusation is likely actionable absent proof. No one believes the individual's statement, but, again, absent proof there is no accusation of perjury. It is likely most of the Media doesn't believe her, yet they will not report on this issue since they want her elected.
If you want me to explain in my opinion what "I don't remember" really means, hell yes, I'll scream that from the rooftops - In my OPINION, Hitlery, in her sworn affidavit, is either getting senile, dumber than she appears to be, or intentionally not remembering and hoping no one has her on audio.
But I will not assert something I can't prove as fact in order to convince a small number of the electorate that my opinion is a fact that I can't prove.
Maybe I'm splitting hairs, but I will not accuse someone of a crime that I can't prove, and more importantly, I will not conduct myself in the manner of these socialist, treasonous, Constitution-hating bastard sons and daughters of our forefathers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.