I understand perjury. We don’t have to convince a jury. We have to convince a small percentage of the electorate to make a difference in this election. Are you going to try to help?
Doug,
Keep up the good fight. In the next year Hillary must get her negatives down if she is to have a chance of winning.
What you are doing provides solid, 100% evidence that Hillary is dishonest and not deserving of elected office.
This won’t bother the die-hard liberals but will influence the independants who still look for good character in their elected officials.
Doug,
Keep up the good fight. In the next year Hillary must get her negatives down if she is to have a chance of winning.
What you are doing provides solid, 100% evidence that Hillary is dishonest and not deserving of elected office.
This won’t bother the die-hard liberals but will influence the independants who still look for good character in their elected officials.
I explain why one cannot, on the evidence available at this time, prove that Hillary perjured herself. You than respond in part: I understand perjury. We don’t have to convince a jury. We have to convince a small percentage of the electorate to make a difference in this election.
and ask me the following question: Are you going to try to help?
If you are asking me to help prevent Hitlery from getting elected, absolutely.
If you are asking me, and it sure looks like you are, to help prevent Hitlery from getting elected by misrepresenting the nature of her declaration, absolutely not.
I WILL NOT conduct myself in the manner of the Democrats and the Clinton camp. Period.
I will not assert that she perjured herself since I can't prove it - and her statement is cleverly crafted to be challenge-proof, absent a smoking gun.
In my field, "I can't remember" equals "I know but don't want to admit what I know." Anyone that hears the first statement, immediately translates the testimony into the second. No one voices their opinion, since the accusation is likely actionable absent proof. No one believes the individual's statement, but, again, absent proof there is no accusation of perjury. It is likely most of the Media doesn't believe her, yet they will not report on this issue since they want her elected.
If you want me to explain in my opinion what "I don't remember" really means, hell yes, I'll scream that from the rooftops - In my OPINION, Hitlery, in her sworn affidavit, is either getting senile, dumber than she appears to be, or intentionally not remembering and hoping no one has her on audio.
But I will not assert something I can't prove as fact in order to convince a small number of the electorate that my opinion is a fact that I can't prove.
Maybe I'm splitting hairs, but I will not accuse someone of a crime that I can't prove, and more importantly, I will not conduct myself in the manner of these socialist, treasonous, Constitution-hating bastard sons and daughters of our forefathers.