Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WDUQ pulls Planned Parenthood spots
Post Gazette ^ | 10/13/2007 | By L.A. Johnson

Posted on 10/15/2007 11:56:50 AM PDT by steel_resolve

Duquesne University has ordered WDUQ-FM to stop airing underwriter support messages from the reproductive rights and health-care education group Planned Parenthood.

The National Public Radio affiliate and jazz station, which is based on the Duquesne University campus and operates under the university's 501(c)3 tax-exempt status, pulled the underwriting acknowledgement messages Thursday.

"Planned Parenthood is not aligned with the university's Catholic mission and identity and legally, stations are not required to accept underwriting support," said Bridget Fare, Duquesne University spokeswoman

(Excerpt) Read more at post-gazette.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 501c3; abortion; duquesne; npr; parenthood; planned; plannedparenthood; publicradio
Score one for the unborn.
1 posted on 10/15/2007 11:56:54 AM PDT by steel_resolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve

“Duquesne University has ordered WDUQ-FM to stop airing underwriter support messages from the reproductive rights and health-care education group Planned Parenthood.”

Ok...I’ll ask. What the hell are “reproductive rights?”


2 posted on 10/15/2007 12:05:36 PM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve

I would suggest that those who are concerned about the unborn look closely at the finances for Susan G. Komen Foundation. They contribute to Planned Parenthood in each of their districts.


3 posted on 10/15/2007 12:07:58 PM PDT by trimom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68
What the hell are “reproductive rights?”

The right to be born, if you ask me.

4 posted on 10/15/2007 12:11:50 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

You notice that it’s not “life rights”.


5 posted on 10/15/2007 12:16:22 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68
"Ok...I’ll ask. What the hell are “reproductive rights?”

liberal speak for abortion.

6 posted on 10/15/2007 12:16:41 PM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

In China, it would be the right to produce more than one child.


7 posted on 10/15/2007 12:18:17 PM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve

DUQ broadcasting NPR in the first place is questionable given the Colleges Catholic chrarter and NPR’s blatant liberal agenda.


8 posted on 10/15/2007 12:19:38 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

“”Ok...I’ll ask. What the hell are “reproductive rights?”

liberal speak for abortion.”

Guess that sounds better than “fetus murder rights.”


9 posted on 10/15/2007 12:20:33 PM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve

Looks like the cafeteria is closing.


10 posted on 10/15/2007 12:21:36 PM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs....doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

“liberal speak” such as this shows the evil that embodies their ideology.

God gave us warning to watch out for such speech - calling evil good and good evil.


11 posted on 10/15/2007 12:24:11 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MrB
"God gave us warning to watch out for such speech - calling evil good and good evil."

See: Isaiah 5:20-21

12 posted on 10/15/2007 12:26:30 PM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; xsmommy; prisoner6; Explorer89

Partial-”I’m Missing my BPT List Today” PING


13 posted on 10/15/2007 12:27:27 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68
What the hell are “reproductive rights?”

Originally, in the old Supreme Court cases, it was basically the right to have as many or as few children as you wish, the right to have access to contraception (Catholic-heavy populations often voted for pols who would make such things illegal), etc. It wasn't in the Constitution, of course, but it was included under the "fundamental right" umbrella anyway, since, if we cannot reproduce, we cannot have a nation!

There are some amazing cases in our history... one of my all-time favorite quotes was, "3 generations of idiots is enough" when deciding to sterilize a ward of the state against her will. (See Buck v Bell... and this was Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes!)

However, today the Left has, as they are wont to do, re-defined the term to exclusively mean the right to choose to terminate a pregnancy, since it is a decision impacting family size.

14 posted on 10/15/2007 12:30:21 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

Here’s one girl who survived someone else’s “choice” to kill her:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1062060/posts


15 posted on 10/15/2007 12:34:32 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve

Yes


16 posted on 10/15/2007 12:59:21 PM PDT by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trimom

I’ve known about this for some time. Now if S.G.K. Foundation is suppose to fund breast cancer research, why give money to another group that is probably (most likely) to be a cause of breast cancer? I never give money to any charity, the reason most money goes to advertising their cause. Very little of what monies are received by charities is used for the intended purpose. I get upset(the previous statement is extremely understated).


17 posted on 10/15/2007 1:15:28 PM PDT by OldBullrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson