Posted on 10/17/2007 12:17:17 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
>>>Well, there are lies. And then there are damn lies CheyennePress.<<<
And then there is the failure to address valid points.
But you show me where I’m lying. I can very easily back up my assertions with examples. And not just one or two.
Repeating little slogans other people invented never proved the first thing.
If he had more of a visible background, then perhaps.
Tell you the truth, if you asked me two years back: Whose Duncan Hunter?...I would have shrugged.
I suppose that’s how it is now, with many Americans.
I didn’t even know whom Fred Thompson was till about a year and a half ago. Then again I didn’t watch tv that much, and I wasn’t really that fond with any political party. I’m still not, but Fred is the only person I’m willing to support...although I would support Duncan, but he’s a long shot.
No, it's successful, high powered businessmen who make a living sizing up the competition.
If that's the case, voting for the animatronic weatherman is a smart bet!
As of today it has been moved to JANUARY 3rd. That is 78 days away!
Brownback just damaged any credibility with conservatives and same with Huckabee who wants amnesty and a nanny state.
Well that doesn't explain Rudy's popularity with this demographic.
Lol. Well said.
Well that doesn't explain Rudy's popularity with this demographic.
Lol. Well said.
I guess Hunter isn’t well known outside of California.
That is likely.
Among Men
- Mitt Romney 24%
- Fred Thompson 23%
- Mike Huckabee 19%
- Rudy Giuliani 11%
- John McCain 6%
Among Women
- Mitt Romney 28%
- Rudy Giuliani 16%
- Mike Huckabee 16%
- Fred Thompson 10%
- John McCain 7%
- Sam Brownback 4%
As far as preferences by sex:
Romney relatively even.
Giuliani women over men.
Huckabee relatively even.
McCain, Brownback, who cares?
Thompson Men > Women by 2.3:1That is a big time disparity, that bodes ill for a GOP nominee. If GOP women are adverse to a GOP candidate, that candidate will be poison to the muddled moderate women needed to get to 51%
Ah yes, the 'Fred doesn't want to be Julius Caesar' complaint.
“I guess Hunter isnt well known outside of California.”
I live in California...and didn’t know him 2 years. So, I think it’s relative to ones location and dedication towards the Republican party.
I would not have thunk this, but Thompson does relatively better among the young, and Romney among the old.
Among 18-29 year olds
- Fred Thompson 24%
- Mitt Romney 22%
- Rudy Giuliani 9%
- Mike Huckabee 9%
- John McCain 9%
- Ron Paul 5%
Among 30-39 year olds
- Mike Huckabee 23%
- Mitt Romney 23%
- Fred Thompson 18%
- Rudy Giuliani 10%
- John McCain 5%
- Sam Brownback 4%
Among 40-49 year olds
- Fred Thompson 23%
- Mike Huckabee 22%
- Rudy Giuliani 15%
- Mitt Romney 13%
- John McCain 7%
- Sam Brownback 6%
Among 50-64 year olds
- Mitt Romney 28%
- Fred Thompson 19%
- Mike Huckabee 18%
- Rudy Giuliani 14%
- John McCain 5%
Among 65+
- Mitt Romney 34%
- Rudy Giuliani 14%
- Fred Thompson 13%
- Mike Huckabee 13%
- John McCain 7%
I think he captures the pro-abort demographic.
I’m a female.
My main issues are Fred Thompson voted YES on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam and “most-favored nation” status for communist Chinese.
I can trace my other issues as a domino effect from there. So I’ll leave it at that.
That’s our Fred. Never did show up in West Tennessee when he was our senator.
I think Hunter has laid foot in Iowa all of once, and that was back for a few minutes to participate in the Ames debate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.