Hunter is the “invisible candidate”. I think he would make a good VP, or head of Homeland Security, though. I’m backing Thompson, and I think he will win.
I don’t see him as an asset for the VP slot.
Many of his supporters appear to be completely unreasonable, and probably won’t support Fred. Fred won’t take CA. Hunter’s not a strategic benefit as VP.
Hunter’d be lovely as head of Homeland Security. THAT might engender more support for Fred than putting Hunter in the VP slot.