Sorry if this was already posted.
But I could not find it.
.
1 posted on
10/17/2007 7:30:12 PM PDT by
george76
To: redpoll
2 posted on
10/17/2007 7:33:36 PM PDT by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: proud_yank; fanfan
3 posted on
10/17/2007 7:35:27 PM PDT by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
The traditional party line is that all of the reports over the centuries of people being attacked by wolves have been lies. Wolves, you see, are afraid of men and there has never been a verified case where a man was attacked and killed by a wolf.
I've always considered that to be total BS.
4 posted on
10/17/2007 7:37:49 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
To: george76
A wolf would never attack a human or a calf or a sheep or a dog or a cat.
All lies.
Wolves are our brothers, and if anyone were lost in the woods, wolves would adopt you, feed you, cuddle you all up, make your bed and bring you presents of barbecued calf livers.
Oops.
Little kids can walk up to any wolf, stick their arm into the wolf’s mouth, and it will lick your face in grateful appreciation.
In fact, every pencil-neck, purse carrying New York City Sierra Club contributer should be given a wolf pack they can pet and hug in their 10 by 6 condo.
9 posted on
10/17/2007 7:52:43 PM PDT by
sergeantdave
(Tofu burgers are the last gasp of a dying society)
To: george76
Coyotes eat the bones, too...
10 posted on
10/17/2007 7:56:46 PM PDT by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts...)
To: george76
Do not meddle in the ways of wolves...for you are crunchy and tasty.
11 posted on
10/17/2007 7:58:28 PM PDT by
RichInOC
(No! BAD doggies! (No! BAD Rich!)...R.I.P.)
To: george76
Is this the same as the guy who wanted to be friends with the bears up in Alaska and they killed and ate him and his girlfriend.
Let me guess, they were conservative Republicans. Just kidding. “Liberal Democrats” in harmony with “nature and the precious environment”. “Peace lovers”. Or in Bear speak,”lunch”.
14 posted on
10/17/2007 8:18:32 PM PDT by
garyhope
(It's World War IV, right here, right now, courtesy of Islam.)
To: george76
I think wolves should be "reintroduced" to urban areas first. Like Central Park.
Let the urbanites who love the wolves see them up close.
24 posted on
10/17/2007 8:54:57 PM PDT by
B Knotts
(Tancredo '08!)
To: george76
If you read the article it (predictably) blames man for the attacks. Wild animals are always unpredictable and dangerous. These liberal attitudes wind up getting people killed.
48 posted on
10/18/2007 5:19:26 AM PDT by
Drawsing
(The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
To: george76
Ye may kill for yourselves, and your mates, and your cubs as they need, and ye can;
But kill not for pleasure of killing, and seven times never kill Man!
From "The Law of the Jungle" (From The Jungle Book) by Rudyard Kipling
49 posted on
10/18/2007 5:19:29 AM PDT by
Clive
To: george76; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...
50 posted on
10/18/2007 5:26:21 AM PDT by
Clive
To: george76
53 posted on
10/18/2007 8:49:22 AM PDT by
Alex Murphy
("Therefore the prudent keep silent at that time, for it is an evil time." - Amos 5:13)
To: Shyla
To: george76
For two incidences of wolf attack, especially one resulting in death, to occur in the same area is an astonishing anomaly.It will be more common when there are more wolves.
62 posted on
10/22/2007 6:53:38 PM PDT by
null and void
(Franz Kafka would have killed himself in despair if he lived in the world we inhabit today.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson