Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney Impresses
RedState.com ^ | October 19, 2007

Posted on 10/20/2007 2:16:38 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Canticle_of_Deborah

Meanwhile, “Fred Thompson Gives 5 Minute Speech To FL GOP; Dozens Ask ‘Is That It?’...”
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/florida/story/278924.html

Fred just doesn’t have it. I’ve never been impressed with him other than the 30 sec. Moore response and his internet announcement. He was almost terrible at his first debtate.

People are going to have to realize it’s between Mitt and Rudy. Mitt’s the obvious choice.


21 posted on 10/21/2007 9:35:25 AM PDT by enough_idiocy (www.daypo.net/test-iraq-war.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

There is a difference between “Mr. Romney yesterday told TV news stations that he would support a Vermont-style civil union law in Massachusetts”, and “he supports civil unions”.

The word support means two different things in those two phrases. The first is what he was willing to compromise on in order to get the constitutional amendment barring Gay Marriage, in a state that would NEVER ban Gay marriage And Civil unions in the legislature.

The second is what he would propose if he were king of the world.

I don’t think he should have been willing to give in to civil unions in order to ban Gay marriage. But this specific example does not mean he would PROPOSE civil unions.

I happen to live in a state where we have not only banned gay marriage, but any contractual equivalent. I’m proud we were able to achieve that. In Massachusetts, as soon as Romney left office, even his watered-down Gay marriage ban was deep-sixed by the legislature. It’s amazing I guess that it stayed alive so long, even though I think it would pass if it made it on the ballot.

I’m not arguing about the “times past” for Romney, my support for him is based on my own OPINION that I can trust him, and then what he is now saying. If he can’t be trusted, what he’s saying is useless (that’s true for any candidate). If he can be trusted, what he’s saying is as good as anybody else that is electable.

I know others don’t believe Romney can be trusted.


22 posted on 10/21/2007 8:58:10 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT (ninjas can't attack you if you set yourself on fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Well, frankly, I don’t trust much of anybody in the upper tiers of power anymore. The Republican Party is very nearly a lost cause.


23 posted on 10/21/2007 9:05:50 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (With "Republicans" like this, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I’m close to agreeing with you on that point. If Government was still limited to it’s constitutional functions, I’d probably abandon the party, knowing that the feds couldn’t really hurt us much one way or another.


24 posted on 10/21/2007 9:19:30 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT (ninjas can't attack you if you set yourself on fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson