Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Politically Correct Call Signs
Strategy Page.com ^ | 10-24-07

Posted on 10/24/2007, 5:15:01 PM by Snickering Hound

October 24, 2007: U.S. Army combat units headed for Iraq have been advised to be sensitive to Iraqis, in order to avoid making anymore enemies than they already have over there. So one unit headed there, the 1/35 Armor (1st battalion of the 35th armored regiment) will change its call sign from "Conqueror" to "Iron Knight." It was felt that the word "Conqueror" might be misinterpreted by Iraqis. Actually, it's not the Iraqis that officers worry about in situations like this, it's U.S. journalists who, on a slow news day, might round up a few English speaking Iraqis and get them to complain about the American tank battalion that refers to themselves as "Conqueror." Oh, the horror. Especially when this stuff reaches Congress, and the incident is brought up when the army asks for money.

The 1/35's call sign is actually derived from the unit motto; "Vincere Vel Mori," (Conquer or Die). In a further twist, the unit previously used the call sign "Iron Knights" for decades, until nine years ago. At that time, there was an army reorganization, and the 1/35th found itself in the same division with an aviation units that also used "Iron Knights" as a call sign. So the 1/35th changed to "Conquerors." But now the aviation unit is gone, and "Iron Knights" is available again.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/24/2007, 5:15:02 PM by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

What’s next? Call sign “Fluffy Bunny”?


2 posted on 10/24/2007, 5:24:39 PM by vikingd00d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

“Operation Sleepy Weasel” *ping*


3 posted on 10/24/2007, 5:24:56 PM by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
Iron Knight?


4 posted on 10/24/2007, 5:26:09 PM by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

LOL

Able Baker Charlie, this is Roger Fox Dog - Over!


5 posted on 10/24/2007, 5:34:10 PM by ASOC (Yeah, well, maybe - but can you *prove* it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Here are some other ideas: Crusaders - Lionhearts - Knights Templars - Saracen Crushers...


6 posted on 10/24/2007, 5:53:44 PM by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d

Snicker


7 posted on 10/24/2007, 7:57:18 PM by Professional Engineer (Your login session has expired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Hmmm. As a sidenote, I don’t expect that any aircraft in near future will be nicknamed “Crusader” even though the nick was freed by the retirement of F-8. Also, I suspect that VMFA-122 will not be going anywhere near Middle-East without a name change...


8 posted on 10/26/2007, 2:46:21 PM by MirrorField (Just an opinion from atheist, minarchist and small-l libertarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson