Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
How DARE people want the Electoral College to be more representative?!? Those dirty bastards!!! Didn't the 2000 election scandal teach them, uh, oh yeah, never mind...
The chairman of the Democratic National Committee came out swinging today against Monday's news of a new campaign to qualify the initiative changing how California's electoral votes are awarded. And just like the first time the initiative surfaced, he blamed it squarely on Republicans in general, and GOP presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani in particular... Dean and state Democratic party chairman Art Torres held a noontime conference call with reporters to bash the initiative that would allow 53 of the Golden State's 55 electoral votes to be awarded based on the winning candidate in each congressional district. That would undoubtedly give the GOP presidential nominee a boost. And Dean made it absolutely clear in his comments: the eventual Democratic nominee can't win the White House without all of California's 55 electoral votes. He said the net effect of a Republican winning, say, 20 of the state's electoral votes, is a 40-vote swing. "It's the equivalent of losing Ohio and another state," said Dean. The dig at Giuliani came in reference to the fact that several of the people reportedly working on the initiative have former ties to the NYC mayor. Democrats also demanded to know who's putting up the money for signature gathers to circulate the petitions, a bank account that backers estimated would reach $3 billion in order to get the initiative on the June ballot. They appear to have as little as three weeks to do that.
Well done, Rudy supporters.

Wonder what Hillary thinks about this? In the aftermath of Gore's attempt to steal the presidency back in 2000, she said the Electoral College needed to be eschewed in favor of direct popular vote. Or somethin'. And that (or this) would suit California voters just fine, because it means an end to the tyranny of the majority.

I'll cough up $10 for this. As soon as I find out where the money should be contributed, I'll send it, and let the Yeeaugh Boy know it was me.
22 posted on 10/25/2007 12:00:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, October 22, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Well, neutering California is better than what I was thinking, when Gray Davis was governor. I wanted to give it back to Mexico, and was calling it the “Occupied Southwest Bank.”


24 posted on 10/25/2007 3:20:45 PM PDT by Berosus ("The candidates that can't face Fox News can't face Al Qaeda."--Roger Ailes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson