Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trucks from Mexico sacrifices economic security (And the health and safety of the U.S. public)
Oakland Tribune ^ | 10/24/07 | Chuck Mack

Posted on 10/24/2007 6:31:16 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

This past month, the Bush Administration opened the U.S. border to trucks from Mexico. Trying to soften the blow, they called it a "pilot program" but it clearly sacrifices the economic security of American workers and the safety and health of the U.S. public on George Bush's altar of free trade.

There is no better example of how big money has corrupted government decision making than cross border trucking. This scheme is opposed by the Teamsters and the entire labor movement, opposed by environmental groups and the Sierra Club, opposed by Public Citizen and a host of other non-governmental organizations, opposed by the Owner Operator and Independent Driver Association and overwhelmingly rejected by the American public.

Even Congress said no, the House of Representatives voted against cross border 411 to 3 in late August and the Senate also said no this past month by a 74 to 24 margin.

Given all of this, it begs the question — for whom and why? The most honest answer I've seen came from Janet Kavinoky, director of Transportation Infrastructure for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce: "It's high time the program gets going, there is substantial money to be saved by American companies."

True, it's all about money. Bush and friends colluding with trans-national multibillion dollar corporations like Wal-Mart and Target.

Don't be misled. This has nothing to do with lower consumer prices and everything to do with maximizing profits. I don't begrudge a company making money, but in this case it comes at the expense of U.S. truck drivers and increased risk to American highway users. To say American truckers are at a competitive disadvantage economically states the obvious. Mexican drivers will be lucky if they receive the U.S. minimum wage. But there are also regulatory disadvantages that are unfair to U.S. truck drivers and pose serious safety risks for highway users.

Consider this — to get a commercial drivers license in the U.S. an applicant must pass six tests: written exam, driving skills test, physical exam, drug test, criminal background check, and personal driving background check If the applicant fails either background check — no license.

What about Mexico? They're better today than five years ago but don't come close to the U.S. standards. They have no data base to track driving records; no lab certified to do drug tests; and even license issuing has caused considerable suspicion.

In their haste to open the border, the Bush team has taken the safety regulations mandated for American truck drivers and given Mexican drivers a pass — not fair and not smart. It makes you wonder whether they are really serious about our borders, national security, highway safety, quality jobs and a level playing field for American workers.

The Teamsters are yes to all of the above and will continue to hold George Bush accountable for breaking the law — in the halls of Congress, with the public and in federal court.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; economic; health; immigration; mexicantrucks; mexico; sacrifices; safety; security; trucks
Chuck Mack is Vice President Western Region of the Oakland-based International Brotherhood of Teamsters.
1 posted on 10/24/2007 6:31:17 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Chuck Mack is Vice President Western Region of the Oakland-based International Brotherhood of Teamsters.

And he dead on right about this issue. Jorge just doesn't give a damn.

2 posted on 10/24/2007 6:38:12 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It will take an accident involving a school bus full of kids to stop this crap.


3 posted on 10/24/2007 6:57:28 PM PDT by Roux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

They said all the same things about canadian drivers - it never happened.


4 posted on 10/24/2007 6:58:17 PM PDT by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Where are the environmentalists on this one?


5 posted on 10/24/2007 7:21:25 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
And he dead on right about this issue. Jorge just doesn't give a damn.

Concur.

6 posted on 10/24/2007 7:22:21 PM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

” Given all of this, it begs the question — for whom and why? The most honest answer I’ve seen came from Janet Kavinoky, director of Transportation Infrastructure for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce: “It’s high time the program gets going, there is substantial money to be saved by American companies.”

And that’s what all the so-called free trade and free market push is about: making more money for US corporations by giving the access to the lowest possible labor costs, port facility costs (in Mexico) and now the lowest possible truck driver costs.


7 posted on 10/24/2007 7:26:32 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Bush’s policies often demonstrate a stronger regard for Mexican citizens than US citizens. At this point I believe we’d all be better off if he resigned his office and moved to Mexico. Cheney would carry out the same Iraq/Iran policy. Perhaps a President Cheney would demonstrate a little more backbone on immigration and border protection.


8 posted on 10/24/2007 7:30:41 PM PDT by Soul of the South (When times are tough the tough get going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
They said all the same things about canadian drivers - it never happened.

Wrong! American trucks hauled freight into Canada long before Canadian truck were allowed to operate down here.

9 posted on 10/24/2007 7:38:40 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Lots of 18 wheelers bearing CANADIAN and MEXICAN licenses rolling up and down I-45 and I-10 through Houston! Drove in from San Antonio Monday and counted 22 Mexican trucks and 16 from Canada between SA and HOU.


10 posted on 10/24/2007 8:18:36 PM PDT by Grams A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat; xcamel; All

Ya’ll ever find out what happened to the 9 big-rig drivers
that bugged-out from the I-5 tunnel fire in Cal. ????!?!?!

Dutch Girls with wooden shoes ???

Hell No !!!

Mexican Truckers in Stolen Trucks !!!

Spot-on Who...


11 posted on 10/24/2007 8:20:52 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Then there’s this little matter of insurance. What happens when one of these Mexicanos has a wreck?

Whomever shall ye sue?


12 posted on 10/24/2007 8:21:47 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

No stolen trucks. The 9 drivers were just illegals who didn’t want to risk getting shipped back home.


13 posted on 10/24/2007 8:35:01 PM PDT by Pelham (Spanish is the new English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

No stolen trucks. The 9 drivers were just illegals who didn’t want to risk getting shipped back home.
~~~
You may have info that I have not seen because the last I
heard the ownership of the trucks was unknown...(FR)...

Link ??


14 posted on 10/24/2007 8:41:38 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Roux

I find it strange that the drivers of family members in the California tunnel accident have not been identified. I’ll wager that the missing dead are Mexican nationals who could have caused that accident.


15 posted on 10/24/2007 8:42:04 PM PDT by texastoo ((((((USA)))))((((((, USA))))))((((((. USA))))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“Consider this — to get a commercial drivers license in the U.S. an applicant must pass six tests: written exam, driving skills test, physical exam, drug test, criminal background check, and personal driving background check If the applicant fails either background check — no license.”

He makes it sound harder to get a CDL than it actually is.

There is no criminal background check required for a CDL, but there is one for a hazmat endorsement.
The “personal driving background” check refered to would only mean the that the individual has a valid driver’s license (no current suspensions, revocations etc.)
The physical exam and drug test referred to are both pretty limited in scope, for example the pre-employment test is a 5 panel test, covering only marijuana, cocaine, PCP, opiates and amphetamines/methamphetamines. Lots of illegal/controlled substances that are not tested for.
The physical exam is not in-depth, basically just checks eyesight, hearing, blood pressure, general physical condition and has limited lab tests on urine for sugar and specific gravity. Drivers must pass this physical at least once every two years.
The written exam and driving skills tests are not difficult, most people pass these as they are finishing their truck driving school.


16 posted on 10/24/2007 10:00:40 PM PDT by Newtoidaho (Liberals have an answer for everything: It's GLOBAL WARMING!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Consider this — to get a commercial drivers license in the U.S. an applicant must pass six tests: written exam, driving skills test, physical exam, drug test, criminal background check, and personal driving background check If the applicant fails either background check — no license.

What about Mexico? They're better today than five years ago but don't come close to the U.S. standards. They have no data base to track driving records; no lab certified to do drug tests; and even license issuing has caused considerable suspicion.

Either we think the U.S. restrictions are important and worthwhile, or we don't. If they are not, the solution should be to eliminate them and/or scale them back, not bypass the process by allowing foreigners and transnationals to operate with fewer restrictions.

The same goes for Prescription Drugs and the FDA, and any other number of subjects.

17 posted on 10/24/2007 10:07:27 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

The standard set should be for all drivers. Same as the law. A law is nothing but paper if it is not enforced.


18 posted on 10/24/2007 10:26:06 PM PDT by yorkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Either we think the U.S. restrictions are important and worthwhile, or we don't. If they are not, the solution should be to eliminate them and/or scale them back, not bypass the process by allowing foreigners and transnationals to operate with fewer restrictions.

The same goes for Prescription Drugs and the FDA, and any other number of subjects.

I disagree. This is exactly the thinking of the free traders. Make it easier to get them across the border for money. Gotta keep that money flowing.

Regardless of what the communist and socialist in our country want, they win when we lower our standards. Just think of any doctor with any degree coming from a third world country and practicing here. What about nurse licenses or any licensed people? Do we drop requirements?

We have to fight this injustice.

19 posted on 10/24/2007 10:27:22 PM PDT by texastoo ((((((USA)))))((((((, USA))))))((((((. USA))))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: yorkie

I agree with you.


20 posted on 10/24/2007 10:27:55 PM PDT by texastoo ((((((USA)))))((((((, USA))))))((((((. USA))))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: texastoo
This is exactly the thinking of the free traders. Make it easier to get them across the border for money. Gotta keep that money flowing.

Not even close. Maybe I didn't communicate very well, cuz you didn't understand me.

I'm not talking about reducing standards... I'm talking about reducing unnecessary bureacracy, if it exists. In the case of truckers, I think most of the requirements should be in place. So why on earth would it be okay to let foreigners operate without meeting those same requirements? Answer: we shouldn't!

21 posted on 10/24/2007 10:34:56 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: texastoo; yorkie
I agree with you.

I do too. That means I really didn't communicate very well, LOL.

22 posted on 10/24/2007 10:41:02 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

I thought you were talking about lowering standards. No.

The requirements for driving should be the same for all. The ability to read road signs in English should also be the same. We should not lower our standards for foreigners. American lives are at risk.

Have you heard anything about the missing drivers in the tunnel crash? Has any family members come forward looking for them?


23 posted on 10/24/2007 10:44:59 PM PDT by texastoo ((((((USA)))))((((((, USA))))))((((((. USA))))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

I have watched you post for too many years and know that we agree. LOL!


24 posted on 10/24/2007 10:48:30 PM PDT by texastoo ((((((USA)))))((((((, USA))))))((((((. USA))))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: texastoo

I haven’t seen anything about the tunnels other than LEOs looking for the missing drivers. .

I’ve been caught up watching the SoCal fires. I’m not at risk, but family members are close to some fires. We’re all suffering from smoky skies and bad air. I’m going to check into selling carbon credits because my house did *not* burn. ;-)


25 posted on 10/24/2007 10:58:17 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
I’m going to check into selling carbon credits because my house did *not* burn. ;-)

LOL!

I have thought about all of you in California. Hope you and family are all well. The smoke has to be bad for the lungs so wear a mask even if you smoke. There are probably large particles in the smoke..

The last I heard about the trucks was the LEO were still looking for missing drivers. Americans families would have come forward. The drivers could also have been driving Mexican trucks from Mexico. If so, we will never know. Bush will cover up.

26 posted on 10/24/2007 11:08:15 PM PDT by texastoo ((((((USA)))))((((((, USA))))))((((((. USA))))))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: texastoo; calcowgirl

I agree with both of you. One more, and we could set up a bridge table.

CCG, I wish I could have kept up with the CA fire thread - but had too much going on, here, and just got lost - with all the posts.

There are some incredible pictures on that thread, and some heart-tugging posts. Glad you are safe - and hope your relatives are, too.

I had to evacuate for a fire, because of smoke. Smoke inhalation can be very harmful.

Take care, and stay safe.


27 posted on 10/24/2007 11:19:50 PM PDT by yorkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

The USDOT-approved insurance carrier the Mexican trucking firm is obligated to have according to American law.


28 posted on 10/25/2007 2:40:15 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Roux
It will take an accident involving a school bus full of kids to stop this crap.

Gosh, I hope not. That would mean the Nanny-Staters will have taken over. Witness what happens every time there is a school shooting.

29 posted on 10/25/2007 2:42:45 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson